SpringerLink
Log in

Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: evidence from the UK

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the influence of board of directors characteristics on the cybersecurity disclosure (CSD) of firms listed on the London Stock Exchange. The current study used an empirical approach to data collection and analysis. The independent variable is the boards of directors’ characteristics; the dependent variables are the CSD. The study analysed 2250 observation of the UK. listed firms for the period of 2011–2020. The results of the current study show a significant and positive relationship between the extent of CSD and the board size, board independence and board meeting; in terms of board gender diversity yielded an insignificant and positive relationship with the extent of CSD. The findings indicate that firms with more independent and larger board, and high meeting frequency promote cybersecurity transparency and reduce related information asymmetric with stakeholders. The analyses have implications for policymakers, top management, corporate executives and practitioners. Firms are encouraged to restructure their board to enhance its effectiveness to better support and monitor CSD. This is the first study in the UK that examined the determinants of CSD. This adds value to the literature on CSD, in addition to contributing to an understanding of the relationship between board characteristics and CSD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adel, C., Hussain, M. M., Mohamed, E. K., & Basuony, M. A. (2019). Is corporate governance relevant to the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure in large European companies? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 32(6), 301–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrafiotis, I., Nurse, J.R., Goldsmith, M., Creese, S. and Upton, D., (2018). A taxonomy of cyber-harms: Defining the impacts of cyber-attacks and understanding how they propagate. Journal of Cybersecurity, 4(1), p.tyy006.

  3. Aladwey, L., Elgharbawy, A. and Ganna, M.A., (2021). Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the U.K. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22 (4), 748–780.

  4. Aladwey, L., Elgharbawy, A. and Ganna, M.A., (2021). Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the U.K. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.

  5. Alodat, A. Y., Al Amosh, H., Khatib, S. F., & Mansour, M. (2023). Audit committee chair effectiveness and firm performance: The mediating role of sustainability disclosure. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1), 2181156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alodat, A. Y., Nobanee, H., Salleh, Z., & Hashim, H. A. (2023). The impact of longer audit committee chair tenure and board tenure on the level of sustainability disclosure: The moderating role of firm size. Business Strategy & Development, 6(4), 885–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., & Hashim, H. A. (2022). Corporate governance and sustainability disclosure: Evidence from Jordan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(5), 866–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alodat, A.Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H.A. and Sulong, F., (2022c). Investigating the mediating role of sustainability disclosure in the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance in Jordan. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, (ahead-of-print).

  10. Alodat, A. Y., Salleh, Z., Hashim, H. A., & Sulong, F. (2024). Sustainability disclosure and firms’ performance in a voluntary environment. Measuring Business Excellence, 28(1), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amir, E., Levi, S., & Livne, T. (2018). Do firms underreport information on cyber-attacks? Evidence from capital markets. Review of Accounting Studies, 23, 1177–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Barka, H., & Legendre, F. (2017). Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: A panel data analysis. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(3), 737–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of business ethics, 37(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng, E. C., & Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The international journal of accounting, 41(3), 262–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciglic, K., & Hering, J. (2021). A multi-stakeholder foundation for peace in cyberspace. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(3), 360–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cortez, E. K., and Dekker, M. (2022). A Corporate Governance Approach to Cybersecurity Risk Disclosure. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–23.‏

  19. Cyber Security Regulation and Incentives Review, (2016). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/579442/Cyber_Security_Regulation_and_Incentives_Review.pdf

  20. Donnelly, R., & Mulcahy, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 416–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foglietta, C., Masucci, D., Palazzo, C., Santini, R., Panzieri, S., Rosa, L., Cruz, T., & Lev, L. (2018). From detecting cyber-attacks to mitigating risk within a hybrid environment. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(1), 424–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Freeman, R.E., (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.

  23. Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Vermiglio, C. (2022). Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, L., Calderon, T. G., & Tang, F. (2020). Public companies’ cybersecurity risk disclosures. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 38, 100468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2006). Managing cybersecurity resources: A cost-benefit analysis (Vol. 1). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., Sohail, T., Tseng, C. Y., & Zhou, L. (2008). Cybersecurity, capital allocations and management control systems. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haapamäki, E., & Sihvonen, J. (2019). Cybersecurity in accounting research. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(7), 808–834. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-09-2018-2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Haapamäki, E. and Sihvonen, J., (2022). Cybersecurity in accounting research. In Artificial Intelligence in Accounting (pp. 182–214). Routledge.

  29. Hair, J. F., Jr., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). A global p-erspect-ivie. Kennesaw State University.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harun, M. S., Hussainey, K., Kharuddin, K. A. M., & Al Farooque, O. (2020). CSR disclosure, corporate governance and firm value: A study on GCC Islamic banks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(4), 607–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of management, 28(6), 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hlel, K., Kahloul, I., & Bouzgarrou, H. (2020). IFRS adoption, corporate governance and management earnings forecasts. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate Governance (pp. 77–132). Gower.

  36. **, J., (2015). Cybersecurity disclosure effectiveness on public companies.

  37. Kesner, I. F., & Johnson, R. B. (1990). An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suits. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A., & Hazaea, S. A. (2022). The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance, 22(5), 1026–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kılıç, M. and Kuzey, C., (2016). The effect of board gender diversity on firm performance: evidence from Turkey. Gender in management: An international journal.

  40. Kumar, K., Kumari, R., Nandy, M., Sarim, M. and Kumar, R., (2022). Do ownership structures and governance attributes matter for corporate sustainability reporting? An examination in the Indian context. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, (ahead-of-print).

  41. Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., Hanh, L. T. M., & Zhang, C. (2019). Intellectual capital, governmental presence, and firm performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lakhal, F. (2005). Voluntary earnings disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from France. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(3), 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Laksmana, I. (2008). Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary accounting research, 25(4), 1147–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Li, H., No, W. G., & Wang, T. (2018). SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure guidance and disclosed cybersecurity risk factors. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 30, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, H., No, W. G., & Wang, T. (2018). SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure guidance and disclosed cybersecurity risk factors. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 30, 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liao, L., Lin, T. P., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lorca, C., Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P., & García-Meca, E. (2011). Board effectiveness and cost of debt. Journal of business ethics, 100(4), 613–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Majumder, M. T. H., Akter, A., & Li, X. (2017). Corporate governance and corporate social disclosures: A meta-analytical review. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(4), 434–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mansour, M., Aishah Hashim, H., Salleh, Z., Al-ahdal, W. M., Almaqtari, F. A., & Abdulsalam Qamhan, M. (2022). Governance practices and corporate performance: Assessing the competence of principal-based guidelines. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2105570. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2105570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mansour, M., Al Amosh, H., Alodat, A. Y., Khatib, S. F., & Saleh, M. W. (2022). The Relationship between Corporate Governance Quality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Capital Structure. Sustainability, 14(17), 10525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mansour, M., Hashim, H. A., & Salleh, Z. (2020). Datasets for corporate governance index of Jordanian non-financial sector firms. Data in brief, 30, 105603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mazumder, M.M.M. and Hossain, D.M. (2022). Voluntary cybersecurity disclosure in the banking industry of Bangladesh: does board composition matter? Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-07-2021-0237.

  54. Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of management and governance, 16(3), 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mueller, M. (2017). Is cybersecurity eating internet governance? Causes and consequences of alternative framings. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 19(6), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-05-2017-0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mundial, F.E., (2019). The global risks report 2019. Ginebra: Foro Económico Mundial.

  57. Nobanee, H., Alodat, A., Bajodah, R., Al-Ali, M., & Al Darmaki, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of cybercrime and cybersecurity risks literature. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(6), 1736–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Nobanee, H., Alodat, A.Y., Dilshad, M.N., El Sayah, A., Alas’ ad, S.N., Al Shalabi, B.O., Alsadi, S.F., Al Marri, N.M. and Fiza, F.K., 2023b. Map** cyber insurance: a taxonomical study using bibliometric visualization and systematic analysis. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2023-0082

  59. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R., 2003. The external control of organisations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

  60. Radu, C., & Smaili, N. (2022). Board gender diversity and corporate response to cyber risk: Evidence from cybersecurity related disclosure. Journal of business ethics, 177(2), 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ramírez, M., Rodríguez Ariza, L., & Gómez Miranda, M. E. (2022). The disclosures of information on cybersecurity in listed companies in latin america—Proposal for a cybersecurity disclosure index. Sustainability, 14(3), 1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rosati, P., Gogolin, F., & Lynn, T. (2022). Cyber-security incidents and audit quality. European Accounting Review, 31(3), 701–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Saggar, R., & Singh, B. (2017). Corporate governance and risk reporting: Indian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(4/5), 378–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Saha, R., & Kabra, K. C. (2021). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from India. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(1), 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Saleh, M. W. A., Zaid, M. A. A., Shurafa, R., Maigoshi, Z. S., Mansour, M., & Zaid, A. (2021). Does board gender enhance Palestinian firm performance? The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 21(4), 685–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2020-0325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Salleh, z., seno, r., alodat, a.y.m. and hashim, h.a., (2022). does the audit committee effectiveness influence the reporting practice of ghg emissions in malaysia?. journal of sustainability science and management, 17(1), pp.204–220.

  68. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (2018). Commission statement and guidance on public company cybersecurity disclosures. Available at: www.sec.gov/rules/interp/2018/33-10459.pdf (accessed 13 November 2018).

  69. Shackelford, S.J. and Bohm, Z., 2016. Securing North American critical infrastructure: A comparative case study in cybersecurity regulation. Can.-USLJ, 40, p. 61.

  70. Smaili, N., Radu, C. and Khalili, A., (2022). Board effectiveness and cybersecurity disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance, pp. 1–23.

  71. Ullah, I., & Zeb, A. (2023). FinTech and firm’s cash holdings: Evidence from China. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(5), 522–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Virtanen, A. (2012). Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 571–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support from the Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (19AGL015).

Funding

Projects of National Social Science Foundation of China (19AGL015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China

    Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao

  2. College of Business, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Haitham Nobanee

  3. Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Haitham Nobanee

  4. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Haitham Nobanee

  5. School of Economics and Managememt, Yiwu Industrial and Commercial College, **hua, China

    Hazem Ali

  6. Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan

    Marwan Mansour

  7. College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

    Hamzeh Al Amosh

Authors
  1. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunhong Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haitham Nobanee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hazem Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marwan Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hamzeh Al Amosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Yuosef Alodat.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alodat, A.Y., Hao, Y., Nobanee, H. et al. Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: evidence from the UK. Electron Commer Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09867-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09867-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation