SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of inclined dense jets in stagnant environments: an LES and experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclined dense jets are commonly used to mitigate the environmental impacts of brine discharge in coastal desalination plants. Numerous studies have been performed to numerically simulate the sophisticated structures of the flow within this process. However, numerical prediction of the process is still a challenge. The present paper performs a comprehensive numerical study using the large eddy simulation (LES) approach on inclined dense jets oriented at angles 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 75°, with a particular emphasis on the near-wall region, where the most complicated structures of the flow occur. The objective is to evaluate the capability of the LES approach to replicate the mixing processes of the brine jets. Besides numerical simulations, a series of experiments using the planar laser-induced fluorescence technique is carried out to compare each numerical simulation with its experimental correspondence. Both numerical and experimental results are presented in comparative figures compared to previous experimental data. The comparisons indicated that the LES model could reasonably predict the geometrical and mixing characteristics of inclined dense jets; however, the flow features are still underestimated by up to 25%. Moreover, the model could reproduce the local concentration build-up near the impact point. The processes within the near-wall region leading to this local decrease of dilution are discussed in detail. Additionally, a novel criterion is proposed to predict when the flow reaches a quasi-steady-state. The criterion can be used to manage the computational expenses, especially in simulations with high demanding computing power such as LES.

Article Highlights

  • The capability of the LES approach to reproduce the mixing behavior of inclined dense jets was investigated.

  • The flow behavior in the near-wall region was analyzed in detail.

  • The LES approach was able to predict the flow behavior, especially in the near-wall region, with reasonable accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. United States Bureau of Reclamation.

References

  1. Abessi O (2018) Brine disposal and management—planning, design, and implementation. In: sustainable desalination handbook: plant selection, design and implementation

  2. Saeedi M, Farahani AA, Abessi O, Bleninger T (2012) Laboratory studies defining flow regimes for negatively buoyant surface discharges into crossflow. Environ Fluid Mech 12:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10652-012-9245-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghayoor S, Hamidi M, Abessi O (2019) Experimental analysis of turbulent flows in brine discharge of coastal desalination plants. J Oceanogr 10:101–111. https://doi.org/10.29252/joc.10.39.101 (In Persian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts PJW, Ferrier A, Daviero G (1997) Mixing in inclined dense jets. J Hydraul Eng 123:693–699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1997)123:8(693)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abessi O, Roberts PJW (2017) Multiport diffusers for dense discharge in flowing ambient water. J Hydraul Eng 143:04017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kikkert GA, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2007) Inclined negatively buoyant discharges. J Hydraul Eng 133:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:5(545)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jirka GH (2008) Improved discharge configurations for brine effluents from desalination plants. J Hydraul Eng 134:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:1(116)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai CCK, Lee JHW (2012) Mixing of inclined dense jets in stationary ambient. J Hydro Environ Res 6:9–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2011.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliver CJ, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2013) Behavior of dense discharges beyond the return point. J Hydraul Eng 139:1304–1308. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cederwall K (1968) Hydraulics of marine waste water disposal. Chalmers tekniska högskola

  11. Zeitoun MA, Reid RO, McHilhenny WF, Mitchell TM (1970) Model studies of ocean outfall systems for desalination plants. Off Saline Water US Department of the Interior, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. Papakonstantis IG, Christodoulou GC, Papanicolaou PN (2011) Inclined negatively buoyant jets 1: geometrical characteristics. J Hydraul Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.537153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papakonstantis IG, Christodoulou GC, Papanicolaou PN (2011) Inclined negatively buoyant jets 2: concentration measurements. J Hydraul Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2010.542617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts PJW, Abessi O (2014) Optimization of desalination diffusers using three-dimensional laser-induced fluorescence. Rep Prep US Bur Reclam Agreem

  15. Antenucci JP, Ransome T, Ferguson M (2015) Field validation of a multiport brine diffuser in a coastal environment: implications for design. In: Australian Coasts and Ports 2015 Conference

  16. Baum MJ, Albert S, Grinham A, Gibbes B (2019) Spatiotemporal influences of open-coastal forcing dynamics on a dense multiport diffuser outfall. J Hydraul Eng 145:05019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baum MJ, Gibbes B, Grinham A et al (2018) Near-field observations of an offshore multiport brine diffuser under various operating conditions. J Hydraul Eng 144:05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abessi O, Roberts PJW (2014) Multiport diffusers for dense discharges. J Hydraul Eng 140:04014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Papakonstantis IG, Tsatsara EI (2018) Trajectory characteristics of inclined turbulent dense jets. Environ Process 5:539–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0307-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papakonstantis IG, Tsatsara EI (2019) Mixing characteristics of inclined turbulent dense jets. Environ Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00359-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crowe AT, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2016) Velocity measurements in inclined negatively buoyant jets. Environ Fluid Mech 16:503–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9435-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramakanth A, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2022) Laboratory study to quantify lower boundary influences on desalination discharges. Desalination 529:115641. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2022.115641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vafeiadou P, Papakonstantis I, Christodoulou G (2005) Numerical simulation of inclined negatively buoyant jets. In: The 9th international conference on environmental science and technology, September. pp 1–3

  24. Oliver CJ, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2008) k-ε Predictions of the initial mixing of desalination discharges. Environ Fluid Mech 8:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9108-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jirka GH (2004) Integral model for turbulent buoyant jets in unbounded stratified flows. Part I: single round jet. Environ Fluid Mech 4:1–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025583110842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee JHW, Cheung V, Wang WP, Cheung SKB (2000) Lagrangian modeling and visualization of rosette outfall plumes. In: Proc Hydroinformatics Iowa

  27. Kheirkhah Gildeh H, Mohammadian A, Nistor I, Qiblawey H (2015) Numerical modeling of 30° and 45° inclined dense turbulent jets in stationary ambient. Environ Fluid Mech 15:537–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9372-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang S, Law AW-K, Jiang M (2017) Large eddy simulations of 45° and 60° inclined dense jets with bottom impact. J Hydro Environ Res 15:54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2017.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abessi O, Roberts PJW (2015) Effect of nozzle orientation on dense jets in stagnant environments. J Hydraul Eng 141:06015009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tahmooresi S, Ahmadyar D (2021) Effects of turbulent Schmidt number on CFD simulation of 45° inclined negatively buoyant jets. Environ Fluid Mech 21:39–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09762-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramezani M, Abessi O, Firoozjaee AR (2021) Effect of proximity to bed on 30° and 45° inclined dense jets: a numerical study. Environ Process 8:1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00533-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu X, Zhang J (2019) Computational fluid dynamics: applications in water, wastewater, and stormwater treatment. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang S, Jiang B, Law AW-K, Zhao B (2016) Large eddy simulations of 45° inclined dense jets. Environ Fluid Mech 16:101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-015-9415-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tofighian H, Amani E, Saffar-Avval M (2020) A large eddy simulation study of cyclones: the effect of sub-models on efficiency and erosion prediction. Powder Technol 360:1237–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim W-W, Menon S (1995) A new dynamic one-equation subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. In: 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Virigina

  37. Holzmann T (2018) Mathematics, numerics, derivations and OpenFOAM®. Holzmann CFD

  38. Jasak H (1996) Error analysis and estimation for the finite volume method with applications to fluid flows. Imperial College London University of London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Martínez J, Piscaglia F, Montorfano A, Onorati A, Aithal SM (2015) Influence of spatial discretization schemes on accuracy of explicit LES: canonical problems to engine-like geometries. Comput Fluids 117:62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Epikhin AS (2019) Numerical schemes and hybrid approach for the simulation of unsteady turbulent flows. Math Model Comput Simul 11:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048219060024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Moukalled F, Mangani L, Darwish M (2016) The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics. Springer International Publishing

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Celik IB, Cehreli ZN, Yavuz I (2005) Index of resolution quality for large eddy simulations. J Fluids Eng 127:949–958. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1990201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pope SB (2004) Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J Phys 6:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Greenshields CJ (2015) OpenFoam user guide. OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd

  45. Tian X, Roberts PJW (2003) A 3D LIF system for turbulent buoyant jet flows. Exp Fluids 35:636–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-003-0714-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Abessi O, Ramani Firoozjayee A, Hamidi M, Bassam M, Khodabakhshi Z (2020) Three dimensional laser scanning system for illumination of fluorescent flow for the environmental hydraulics investigations. J Hydraul 14:69–81. https://doi.org/10.30482/JHYD.2020.105499 (in Persian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Daviero GJ, Roberts PJW, Maile K (2001) Refractive index matching in large-scale stratified experiments. Exp Fluids 31:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480000260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gungor E, Roberts PJW (2009) Experimental studies on vertical dense jets in a flowing current. J Hydraul Eng 135:935–948. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fedele F, Abessi O, Roberts PJ (2015) Symmetry reduction of turbulent pipe flows. J Fluid Mech 779:390–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fischer HB, List JE, Koh CR, Imberger J, Brooks N (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  51. Roberts PJW, Toms G (1987) Inclined dense jets in flowing current. J Hydraul Eng 113:323–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:3(323)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Abessi O, Roberts PJW (2016) Dense jet discharges in shallow water. J Hydraul Eng 142:04015033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Jiang B, Law AW-K, Lee JH-W (2014) Mixing of 30° and 45° inclined dense jets in shallow coastal waters. J Hydraul Eng 140:241–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shao D, Law AWK (2010) Mixing and boundary interactions of 30° and 45° inclined dense jets. Environ Fluid Mech 10:521–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9171-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ramezani M, Abessi O, Rahmani Firoozjayee A (2021) Experimental study of geometrical characteristics of free and boundary-affected 30° inclined dense jets in unstratified stagnant environments. J Water Wastewater 32:91–102. https://doi.org/10.22093/WWJ.2020.238900.3047 (in Persian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Aghajanpour A (2018) Experimental and numerical modeling of upwardly inclined turbulent dense jet unjection into a stagnant ambient. Babol Noshirvani University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  57. Crowe AT (2013) Inclined negatively buoyant jets and boundary interaction. University of Canterbury

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kikkert GA (2006) Buoyant jets with two and three-dimensional trajectories. University of Canterbury

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cipollina A, Brucato A, Grisafi F, Nicosia S (2005) Bench-scale investigation of inclined dense jets. J Hydraul Eng 131:1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:11(1017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Oliver CJ, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2013) Removing the boundary influence on negatively buoyant jets. Environ Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-013-9278-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Reungoat D, Rivière N, Fauré JP (2007) 3C PIV and PLIF measurement in turbulent mixing. J Vis 10:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03181809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ramezani M, Abessi O, Rahmani Firoozjayee A (2020) Numerical simulation of dense discharges from 30° submerged inclined jet in free and bed-affected conditions. J Hydraul 15:75–91. https://doi.org/10.30482/JHYD.2020.228141.1454 (in Persian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Baum MJ, Gibbes B (2020) Field-scale numerical modeling of a dense multiport diffuser outfall in crossflow. J Hydraul Eng 146:05019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Papanicolaou PN, Papakonstantis IG, Christodoulou GC (2008) On the entrainment coefficient in negatively buoyant jets. J Fluid Mech 614:447–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008003509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Papakonstantis IG, Papanicolaou PN (2022) On the computational modeling of inclined brine discharges. Fluids 7:86. https://doi.org/10.3390/FLUIDS7020086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bloutsos AA, Yannopoulos PC (2020) Revisiting mean flow and mixing properties of negatively round buoyant jets using the esca** mass approach (EMA). Fluids 5:131. https://doi.org/10.3390/FLUIDS5030131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Oliver CJ, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2013) Predicting the near-field mixing of desalination discharges in a stationary environment. Desalination 309:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2012.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Crowe AT, Davidson MJ, Nokes RI (2016) Modified reduced buoyancy flux model for desalination discharges. Desalination 378:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2015.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Yannopoulos PC, Bloutsos AA (2012) Esca** mass approach for inclined plane and round buoyant jets. J Fluid Mech 695:81–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/JFM.2011.564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding support of the Babol Noshirvani University of Technology through grant program No. BNUT/390035/1400.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Hessam Tofighian

  2. School of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

    Abdolreza Aghajanpour, Ozeair Abessi & Mohammadmehdi Ramezani

Authors
  1. Hessam Tofighian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdolreza Aghajanpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ozeair Abessi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammadmehdi Ramezani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ozeair Abessi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tofighian, H., Aghajanpour, A., Abessi, O. et al. Simulation of inclined dense jets in stagnant environments: an LES and experimental study. Environ Fluid Mech 22, 1161–1185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09884-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09884-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation