Log in

Examining the Impact of a GI Hospitalist Model on the Outcomes of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A GI hospitalist (GIH) is a physician who practices in the inpatient setting performing consultations and endoscopic procedures. Obscure small bowel bleeding is a common inpatient diagnosis that is difficult to manage and associated with longer hospitalizations. Having an onsite GIH physician with expertise in video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) has the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Aims

This study will be the first to explore how implementing a GIH model and providing a GIH with training in DBE can affect the outcomes of patients with small bowel pathology.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients who received an inpatient DBE at an academic medical center before and after initiation of a GIH model and credentialing of a GIH in DBE. We compared outcomes, including procedure volumes, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, procedure duration, time to procedure, and length of stay.

Results

There was a 46.5% increase in the number of DBEs performed by the GIH. The diagnostic yield increased from 56.3 to 74.0% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2–4.2), and the proportion of DBEs with a therapeutic intervention increased from 38.0 to 65.4% (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4–7.0). The total procedure time increased from 77.8 to 96.4 min (p < 0.05) with a GIH.

Conclusion

Having a GIH perform inpatient DBEs was associated with an increased number of procedures, duration of procedures, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic interventions. The onsite presence of a GIH with competency in DBE improves the care of hospitalized patients with small bowel pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Hughes ML et al. Adapting to the challenge of hospital-based care: the evolving role of gastroenterology hospitalists. Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117:361–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shung D, Hung KH, Laine L, Hughes ML. S0521 adopting a GI hospitalist model: a new method for increasing procedural volume. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;115:S259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahadev S, Lebwohl B, Ramirez I, Garcia-Carrasquillo R. Mo1115 transition to a GI hospitalist system is associated with expedited upper endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2016;150:S639–S640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes M et al. The role of the gastroenterology hospitalist in modern practice. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;16:571–576.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerson LB et al. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of small bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1265–1287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elli L et al. Clinical impact of videocapsule and double balloon enteroscopy on small bowel bleeding: results from a large monocentric cohort in the last 19 years. Dig Liver Dis 2022;54:251–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider M, Hollerich J, Beyna T. Device-assisted enteroscopy: a review of available techniques and upcoming new technologies. World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:3538–3545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Akerman PA. Spiral enteroscopy versus double-balloon enteroscopy: choosing the right tool for the job. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;77:252–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda Y et al. Video capsule endoscopy as the initial examination for overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding can efficiently identify patients who require double-balloon enteroscopy. BMC Gastroenterology 2015;15:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wadhwa V et al. A meta-analysis on efficacy and safety: single-balloon vs. double-balloon enteroscopy. Gastroenterol Rep 2015;3:148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalal A, Patil G, Maydeo A. Outcomes of double balloon enteroscopy of managing overt small bowel bleeding. Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2020;11:118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SP et al. Indication, location of the lesion, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic yield of double-balloon enteroscopy: seventeen years of experience. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:2224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Latorre M, Gross SA, Pochapin MB. A practical guide to establishing a gastroenterology hospitalist program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;19:871-875 e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine I et al. Diagnostic yield of inpatient capsule endoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2022;22:236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto H et al. New system of double-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1556–1557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA 2002;287:487–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prakash C, Zuckerman GR. Acute small bowel bleeding: a distinct entity with significantly different economic implications compared with GI bleeding from other locations. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2003;58:330–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. de Campos TS et al. Impact of center and endoscopist ERCP volume on ERCP outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023;98:306-315 e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan DW et al. A national survey of the infrastructure and scope of practice for gastroenterology hospitalists. Dig Dis Sci 2023;68:1148–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07831-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SB contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, and writing (original draft). MD contributed to conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision, and writing (original draft).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaili Babbar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

MD: OVESCO, Medtronic, Olympus, Motus GI, and Vascular Technology Incorporated.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babbar, S., Debordeaux, M. Examining the Impact of a GI Hospitalist Model on the Outcomes of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Dig Dis Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08552-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08552-0

Keywords

Navigation