Log in

Validation and Performance of FibroScan®-AST (FAST) Score on a Brazilian Population with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

FAST score has a good performance for diagnosing the composite of NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2. However, it has not been evaluated in Latin American individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to analyze the performance of the FAST score in a Brazilian NAFLD population.

Methods

Cross-sectional study was held in ≥ 18 years NAFLD patients diagnosed by ultrasonography and submitted to liver biopsy (LB). Liver stiffness (LSM) and CAP measurements were performed with FibroScan®, using M (BMI < 32 kg/m2) or XL probes. Area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were calculated as well as sensitivity (S), specificity (Spe), positive predictive value (VPP) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the previously established FAST score cut-offs.

Results

Among 287 patients included (75% female; mean age 55 ± 10 years), NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2 was reported in 30% of LB. For the FAST cut-off of 0.35, the S and NPV to rule out NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2 were 78.8% and 87.8%, respectively. Regarding the cut-off of 0.67, the Spe and PPV to rule-in NASH + NAS ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2 were 89.1%, 61.8%, respectively. The AUROC of FAST for all included patients was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72–0.84) and for those with ≥ 32 kg/m2 was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74–0.88).

Conclusion

FAST score has a good performance in a Brazilian NAFLD population, even in patients with higher BMI when the XL probe is adopted. Therefore, FAST can be used as a noninvasive screening tool mainly for excluding the diagnosis of progressive NASH, reducing the number of unnecessary liver biopsies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH:

Steatohepatitis

TE:

Transient elastography

CAP:

Controlled Attenuation Parameter

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

FAST score:

FibroScan®-AST

PPV:

Positive predictive value

NPV:

Negative predictive value

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

ICF:

Informed consent form

BMI:

Body mass index

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

GGT:

Gammaglutamil transferase

kPa:

Kilopascal

dB/m:

Decibel/meter

OR:

Odds ratios

AUROC:

Area under receiver operating characteristic

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes

SAH:

Systemic arterial hypertension

S:

Sensitivity

Spe:

Specificity

References

  1. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:124–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Natta MV et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:475–485. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology. Gut. 2020;69:1382–1403. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekstedt M, Hagstrom H, Nasr P et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61:1547–1554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanyal AJ. Past, present and future perspectives in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;16:377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Younossi ZM, Loomba R, Rinella ME et al. Current and future therapeutic regimens for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2018;68:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardoso AC, de Figueiredo-Mendes C, Villela-Nogueira CA, Sanyal AJ. New drugs for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2020;40:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong GL, Wong VW-S, Choi PC-L et al. Assessment of fibrosis by transient elastography compared with liver biopsy and morphometry in chronic liver diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1027–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoneda M, Yoneda M, Mawatari H et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:371–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong VW, Vergniol J, Wong GL-H et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2010;51:454–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellentani S, Saccoccio G, Masutti F et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatic steatosis in Northern Italy. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:112–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard P-H et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 2010;51:828–835.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong GL-H, Wong VW-S, Chim AM-L et al. Factors associated with unreliable liver stiffness measurement and its failure with transient elastography in the Chinese population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;26:300–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, El-Hajbi F, Merrouche W, Rigalleau V. Feasibility of liver transient elastography with FibroScan using a new probe for obese patients. Liver Int. 2010;30:1043–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedrich-Rust M, Hadji-Hosseini H, Kriener S et al. Transient elastography with a new probe for obese patients for non-invasive staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2390–2396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong VW-S, Vergniol J, Wong GL-H et al. Liver stiffness measurement using XL probe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1862–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sasso M, Beaugrand M, de Ledinghen V et al. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel VCTE guided ultrasonic attenuation measurement for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis: preliminary study and validation in a cohort of patients with chronic liver disease from various causes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1825–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Merrouche W, le Bail B. Non-invasive diagnosis of liver steatosis using controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and transient elastography. Liver Int. 2012;32:911–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Lédinghen V, Wong VW-S, Vergniol J et al. Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement: comparison between M and XL probe of FibroScan. J Hepatol 2012;56:833–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Lédinghen V, Hiriart JB, Vergniol J, Merrouche W, Bedossa P, Paradis V. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) with the XL probe of the Fibroscan®: a comparative study with the M probe and liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:2569–2577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4638-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cardoso AC, Cravo C, Calçado FL et al. The performance of M and XL probes of FibroScan for the diagnosis of steatosis and fibrosis on a Brazilian nonalcoholic fatty liver disease cohort. Eur J Gastroentrol Hepatol. 2020;32:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Newsome PN, Sasso M, Deeks JJ et al. FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30383-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J-M et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1705–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J. Transient elastography (FibroScan). Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008;32:58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Idalsoaga F, Kulkarni AV, Mousa OY, Arrese M, Arab JP. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease: two intertwined entities. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weston SR, Leyden W, Murphy R et al. Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2005;41:372–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20554.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parra FC, Amado RC, Lambertucci JR, Rocha J, Antunes CM, Pena SDJ. Color and genomic ancestry in Brazilians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0126614100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alves-Silva J, Da Silva Santos M, Guimarães PE. The ancestry of Brazilian mtDNA lineages. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;67:444–461. https://doi.org/10.1086/303004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cotrim HP, Parise ER, Oliveira CPMS et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Brazil. Clinical and histological profile. Ann Hepatol. 2011;10:33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cotter TG, Rinella M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2020: the state of the disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1851–1864. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Argo CK, Caldwell SH. Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Liver Dis. 2009;13:511–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2009.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oeda S, Takahashi H, Imajo K et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan-AST score to identify non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: comparison between M and XL probes. Hepatol Res. 2020;50:831–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive assessment of liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1264-1281.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by funding from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Rio de Janeiro, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, (CNPq), Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Cristiane A. Villela-Nogueira and Ana Carolina Cardoso contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Ana Carolina Cardoso, Cristiane Valle Tovo, Nathalie Carvalho Leite, Ibrahim A El Bacha, Fernanda Luiza Calçado, Gabriela Perdomo Coral, Glauco Navas Sammarco, Claudia Cravo, Roberto José Carvalho Filho, Renata de Mello Perez, Edison Roberto Parise and Cristiane A. Villela-Nogueira. Statistical analysis was performed by Ronir Raggio Luiz and Cristiane A. Villela-Nogueira. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ana Carolina Cardoso, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiane A. Villela-Nogueira.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in this study were following the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The local Ethics Committee (Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho) approved the study (CAAE No. 38752414.7.0000.5257).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cardoso, A.C., Tovo, C.V., Leite, N.C. et al. Validation and Performance of FibroScan®-AST (FAST) Score on a Brazilian Population with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci 67, 5272–5279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07363-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07363-x

Keywords

Navigation