Log in

A True Positive and a False Negative? The Dilemma of Negative Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Many colonoscopies following a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) will not identify a probable cause for fecal blood, and missed neoplasia is a concern. The study determined whether the absence of neoplasia at a FIT positive diagnostic colonoscopy was due to a missed lesion and whether the initial FIT hemoglobin (f-Hb) concentration could predict missed lesions.

Methods

This was a retrospective audit of patients who had undergone diagnostic colonoscopy after FIT screening (2 sample ≥ 20 µg Hb/g feces). Probable bleeding lesions including cancer, advanced adenoma, colitis, and angiodysplasia were considered a “positive colonoscopy outcome.” For those with a negative outcome, findings at the subsequent colonoscopy were assessed.

Results

There were 1087 good quality colonoscopies within 12 months of a positive FIT. In total, 171 (15.7%) patients had a positive outcome at the diagnostic colonoscopy. Subsequent colonoscopies of negative outcome cases (n = 418, median of 3.1y later) were reviewed; of these, there were 57 (13.6%) cases with a positive outcome. This included CRC in 0.5% (n = 2) and advanced adenoma in 11.7% (n = 49). High f-Hb and having both FIT samples ≥ 20 µg/g feces were associated with a positive outcome at the original diagnostic colonoscopy (p < 0.05). However, f-Hb was not predictive for a positive outcome at the subsequent colonoscopy by either maximum f-Hb (p = 0.768), total f-Hb (p = 0.459), or both FIT samples ≥ 20 µg/g (p = 0.091).

Conclusion

A small proportion of “false” positive FIT results had cancer or advanced adenoma found at the subsequent colonoscopy. A missed lesion could not be predicted by the initial FIT f-Hb.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu HM, Chen SL, Yen AM et al. Effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing in reducing colorectal cancer mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program. Cancer. 2015;121:3221–3229. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–1371. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199305133281901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Young GP, Symonds EL, Allison JE et al. Advances in fecal occult blood tests: the FIT revolution. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:609–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3445-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Imperiale TF, Gruber RN, Stump TE, Emmett TW, Monahan PO. Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomatous polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:319–329. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AIHW, Analysis of bowel cancer outcomes for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. 2018: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra.

  7. Gini A, Jansen EEL, Zielonke N et al. Impact of colorectal cancer screening on cancer-specific mortality in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2020;127:224–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole SR, Tucker GR, Osborne JM et al. Shift to earlier stage at diagnosis as a consequence of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Med J Aust. 2013;198:327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner H, Werner S. Selecting a cut-off for colorectal cancer screening with a fecal immunochemical test. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8:e111. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim NH, Park JH, Park DI et al. Are hemorrhoids associated with false-positive fecal immunochemical test results? Yonsei Med J. 2017;58:150–157. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim NH, Jung YS, Lim JW et al. Yield of repeat colonoscopy in asymptomatic individuals with a positive fecal immunochemical test and recent colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee J, Park SW, Kim YS et al. Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7468. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007468.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rivero-Sanchez L, Grau J, Auge JM et al. Colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in fecal immunochemical test-positive participants from a colorectal cancer screening program. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E1140–E1148. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0650-4296.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribbing Wilen H, Blom J, Hoijer J et al. Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening: colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2019.1585569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cock C, Anwar S, Byrne SE et al. Low sensitivity of fecal immunochemical tests and blood-based markers of DNA hypermethylation for detection of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Dig Dis Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05569-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia M, Mila N, Binefa G et al. Fecal hemoglobin concentration as a measure of risk to tailor colorectal cancer screening: are we there yet? Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015;24:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim NH, Kwon MJ, Kim HY et al. Fecal hemoglobin concentration is useful for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bampton PA, Sandford JJ, Young GP. Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia. Med J Aust. 2002;176:155–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ciatto S, Martinelli F, Castiglione G et al. Association of FOBT-assessed faecal Hb content with colonic lesions detected in the Florence screening programme. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:218–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fenocchi E, Gaggero P, Rondán M et al. Usefulness of the fecal immunochemical test in the detection of advanced adenomas in subjects at average risk for colorectal cancer. Endoscopia. 2015;27:64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Bureau of Statistic. Socio-economic Indexes for Areas: Technical Paper, 2016. 2016; cat. no. 2033.0.55.001:[

  22. Symonds EL, Fraser CG, Bastin D, Berwald G, Young GP. The effect of the variability in fecal immunochemical test sample collection technique on clinical performance. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao CS, Lin YM, Chang HC et al. Application of quantitative estimates of fecal hemoglobin concentration for risk prediction of colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8366–8372. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Auge JM, Pellise M, Escudero JM et al. Risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia according to fecal hemoglobin concentration in a colorectal cancer screening program. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Hunt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hunt, J.S., Cock, C. & Symonds, E.L. A True Positive and a False Negative? The Dilemma of Negative Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test. Dig Dis Sci 67, 1843–1849 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06986-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06986-4

Keywords

Navigation