SpringerLink
Log in

The Outcome Assessment of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy for Diagnosing and Managing Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnosing and treating patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is clinically challenging. Most lesions responsible for the origin of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding are located in the small bowel. Double-balloon enteroscopy is a novel method for exploring the small intestine and has significant therapeutic potential. This study evaluated the value of double-balloon enteroscopy in diagnosing and managing obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. From October 2003 to January 2006, a total of 20 patients (6 men, 14 women; mean age, 55.2 years old) with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (18 obscure overt bleeding, 2 obscure occult bleeding) were investigated by double-balloon enteroscopy. A total of 29 procedures (15 via oral approach and 14 via rectal approach) were performed. The diagnostic yield, endoscopic therapeutic procedures, complications, and outcome were then assessed.

Small bowel lesions potentially responsible for the bleeding were identified in 15 (75%) of 20 patients, including 9 angiodysplasias, 2 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 2 ulcers, 1 jejunal granulation polyp, and 1 Peutz-Jeghers polyposis. Endoscopic treatments including heater probe coagulation, polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection were performed in 11 patients. Two patients with GISTs received surgical intervention. Two patients with angiodysplasias that endoscopic treatment failed underwent laparoscopic resections following tattooing. There were no complications and the procedures were tolerated well. Among the 15 patients who had a lesion identified with subsequent treatment, rebleeding occurred in 3 (20%) patients with angiodysplasias. Of the five patients in whom no definite lesion was detected, rebleeding developed in four (80%). For patients with an identified lesion that was further treated, the rebleeding rate was lower than for those with “persistent” obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (P=0.031). We conclude that double-balloon enteroscopy offers a safe and effective method for diagnosing and managing patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zuckerman GR, Prakash C, Askin MP, Lewis BS (2000) AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 118:201–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lau WY, Fan ST, Wong SH, Wong KP, Poon GP, Chu KW, Yip WC, Wong KK (1987) Preoperative and intraoperative localisation of gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. Gut 28:869–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis BS (1994) Small intestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 23:67–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seensalu R (1999) The sonde examination. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 9:37–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis BS, Swain P (2002) Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 56:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E, Abbiati C, Beccari G, Rossini FP, Rossini FP, Franchis RD (2004) Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 126:643–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosch T (2004) DDW report 2004 New Orleans: capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 36:763–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Keuchel M, Hagenmuller F (2005) Small bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 37:122–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ell C, Remke S, May A, Helou L, Henrich R, Mayer G (2002) The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 34:685–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL, Fassler I, Villarejo J, Vahedi K, Bitoun A, Canard JM, Souquet JC, Ponchon T, Florent C, Gay G (2003) Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push enteroscopy. Endoscopy 35:576–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adler DG, Knipschield M, Gostout C (2004) A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin. Gastrointest Endosc 59:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, Foschia F, Mutignani M, Perri V, Vecchioli A, Brizi MG, Picciocchi A, Marano P (2002) A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology 123:999–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Iino S, Ido K, Sugano K (2001) Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 53:216–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Su MY, Liu NJ, Hsu CM, Chiu CT, Chen PC, Lin CJ (2005) Double balloon enteroscopy-the last blind-point of the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 62:62–70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, Hayashi Y, Sato H, Yano T, Iwamoto M, Sekine Y, Miyata T, Kuno A, Ajibe H, Ido K, Sugano K (2004) Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1010–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2005) Double-balloon enteroscopy(push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 62:62–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ell C, May A, Nachbar L, Cellier C, Landi B, di Caro S, Gasbarrini A (2005) Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon techniques: result of a prospective European multicenter study. Endoscopy 37:613–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Di Caro S, May A, Heine DG, Fini L, Landi B, Petruzziello L, Cellier C, Mulder CJ, Costamagna G, Ell C, Gasbarrini A, DBE-European Study Group (2005) The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact. Gastrointest Endosc 62:545–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaffes AJ, Koo JH, Meredith C (2006) Double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and the management of small-bowel diseases: an initial experience in 40 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 63:81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen MJ, Kuipers EJ, Iacobs MA, Mulder CJ (2006) Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Endoscopy 38:42–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Esaki M, Nakamura S, Iida M (2005) Perfromance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: comparison with push enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 62:392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadithi M, Heine GD, Jacobes MA, Bodegraven AA, Mulder CJ (2006) A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 101:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura M, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N, Miyahara R, Ohashi A, Itoh A, Hirooka Y, Goto H (2006) Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Endoscopy 38:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Moriyama T, Nakamura S, Iida M (2005) Comparsion of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyosis. Endoscopy 37:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Foutch PG (1993) Angiodysplasia of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Gastroenterol 88:807–818

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fusing Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Chen-Ming Hsu, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Ming-Yao Su, Wei-Pin Lin, Pang-Chi Chen & Cheng-Hsiung Chen

Authors
  1. Chen-Ming Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng-Tang Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming-Yao Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei-Pin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pang-Chi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cheng-Hsiung Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Yao Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, CM., Chiu, CT., Su, MY. et al. The Outcome Assessment of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy for Diagnosing and Managing Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 52, 162–166 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9554-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9554-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation