Log in

The politics of criminal violence in Brazil: State violence, gang and the plebs

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The argument of this article is that state violence and the criminalization of human rights in post-authoritarian Brazil (1985–) have stifled traditional political activism in poor urban communities and, in turn, have opened up a new space for political expression by the poor through the “politicization of crime.” As a “pacted transition” between elites, the transfer from an authoritarian to a democratic regime in the 1980s ensured the impunity of illegal state violence and the subversion of democratic principles, including the defense of human rights. The transition, taking place in the context of a war on drugs and on the poor, established a well-documented “securitized democracy.” In this article, I show how the securitization discourse came to frame human rights defenders as the “allies of criminals” and made them targets of illegal police violence. This reign of terror laid the ground for a violent militarized political space that came to be occupied by one of Brazil’s major criminal gangs, the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC). In this article, I examine these new territorializations of power and violence and the consequences for democratic politics. I draw on political philosophy to introduce the concept of the “plebs” in this politicization of crime as a form of expression by the poor. I argue that the PCC, in addition to its criminal activities, is sustained by the appropriation of a plebeian imaginary of equality, freedom and quest for the “right to have rights.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The experts are Fabian Salvioli, Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence; Nils Melzer, Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; Agnes Callamard, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; and David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of freedom of opinion and expression.

  2. Agravo de Execução Penal nº 0,038,494–46.2014.8.26.0000, TJSP, 3ª Câmara de Direito Criminal, Rel. Des. Geraldo Wohler, j. 19.08.2014, DJ 28.08.2014, v.u.; Agravo de Execução Penal nº 0,013,202- 93.2013.8.26.0000, TJSP, 3ª Câmara de Direito Criminal, Rel. Des. Toloza Neto, j. 30.07.2013, DJ 05.08.2013, v.u.

  3. Testimony of Marcos William Herbas Camacho, known as Marcola, before the Comissão de Combate à Violência (Committee to Combat Violence) on October 21, 2011, as indicated in its final report. Marcola is considered one of the main leaders of the PCC since 2002, after the split with the founding members Geleião and Cesinha. At the time of this testimony, however, that split had not yet occurred.

References

  1. Adorno, S., & Salla, F. (2007). Criminalidade organizada nas prisões e os ataques do PCC. Estudos Avançados: dossiê crime organizado, 21(61), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142007000300002.

  2. Alfaya, I. (2018). PCC já tem mais de 30 mil membros espalhados pelo Brasil, diz MP-SP. R7 Notícias. https://noticias.r7.com/sao-paulo/pcc-ja-tem-mais-de-30-mil-membros-espalhados-pelo-brasil-diz-mp-sp-09072018. Accessed November5, 2020.

  3. Amnesty International. (2017). Deadly but preventable attacks. Index: ACT 30/7270/2017. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/ACT3072702017ENGLISH.PDF. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  4. Amnesty International. (2015). You killed my son : Homicides by military police in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Index: AMR 19/2068/2015. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR1920682015ENGLISH.PDF. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  5. Amnesty International. (2005). They come in shooting: Policing socially excluded communities. Index: AMR 19/025/2005. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR1920682015ENGLISH.PDF. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  6. Amnesty International. (1990). Brasil : Tortura e execuções extra-judiciais nas cidades brasileiras. Index: AMR 19/05/90.

  7. Forum brasileiro de segurança pública. (2018). 12o Anuário brasileiro de segurança pública.São Paulo: Forum brasileiro de segurança pública. https://forumseguranca.org.br/anuario-12/. Accessed 6 July 2021.

  8. Arias, E. D. (2006). Drugs and democracy in Rio de Janeiro. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bertolotto, R. (2012). Rappers ex-presidiários veem PCC como grupo de resistência. UOL Notícias. https://noticias.uol.com.br/cotidiano/ultimas-noticias/2012/12/07/rappers-ex-presidiarios-veem-pcc-como-grupo-de-resistencia.htm. Accessed 5 Oct 2019.

  10. Biondi, K. (2018). Proibido roubar na quebrada: Território, hierarquia e lei no PCC. São Paulo: Editora Terceiro Nome / Editora Gramma.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biondi, K. (2017). “It was already in the ghetto”: Rap, religion and crime in the prison. Interview with Djalma Oliveira Rios, aka Cascão. Prison Service Journal, 229, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biondi, K. (2016). Sharing this walk: An ethnography of prison life and the PCC in Brazil. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Breaugh, M. (2013). The plebeian experience: A discontinuous history of political freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Brossat, A. (2003). Le serviteur et son maître : essai sur le sentiment plébéien. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer.

  15. Caldeira, T. (2000). City of walls: Crime, segregation, citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Cano, I. (2008). Análise dos impactos dos ataques do PCC em São Paulo em maio de 2006. Rio de Janeiro: Conectas Direitos Humanos et Laboratório de Análise da violência (LAV-UERJ).

  17. Castoriadis, C. (1987 [1975]). The imaginary institution of society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  18. Cerqueira, D., Sergio de Lima, R., Bueno, S., Neme, C., Ferreira, H., Coelho, D., Palmieri, P., Pinheiro, M., Astolfi, R., & Marques, D. (2018). Atlas da violência 2018. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).

  19. Cersosismo, D. (2018). Pulso Brasil : 63% dos Brasileiros são a favor dos direitos humanos. IPSOS. https://www.ipsos.com/pt-br/63-dos-brasileiros-sao-favor-dos-direitos-humanos. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  20. Clastres, P. (1989 [1974]). Society against the state: Essays in political anthropology. New York: Zone Books.

  21. Comissão de combate à violência (2001, October 21). Depoimento de Marcos William Herbas Camacho [Deposition of Marcos William Herbas Camacho]. Câmara dos Deputados. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/20060708-marcos_camacho.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  22. Comissão parlamentar de inquéritos do tráfico de armas (2006). Transcrição ipsis verbis da tomada de depoimento de Marcos Willians Herbas Camacho (Marcola) pela Comissão parlamentar de inquéritos do tráfico de armas [Transcription Ipso Verbis of the testimony of Marcos Williams Herbas Camacho (Marcola) by the Parliamentary inquiry committee on arms contraband]. Department of Taquigrafia: Chamber of Deputies. http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/20060708-marcos_camacho.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  23. Corten, A., Peñafiel, R., & Huart, C. (2012). L’interpellation plébéienne en Amérique latine. Paris: Karthala.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Da Silva, J. (1996). Militarização da segurança pública e a reforma da polícia. In R. Bustamante & P.C. Sodré (Eds.), O Direito em Revista, 497–519. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Atualização Jurídica.

  25. Décary-Secours, B. (2016). Violences criminelles et contexte démocratique: la politique des imaginaires de la punition au Brésil (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada). Retrieved from Omni.

  26. Deluchey, J.-F. (2003). De la guerre contre le crime au Brésil : culture autoritaire et politiques publiques de la sécurité. Autrepart, 26, 73–186. https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.026.0173.

  27. Feltran, G. (2018). Irmãos: Uma história do PCC. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Feltran, G. (2013). Sobre anjos e irmãos: cinquenta anos de expressão política do ‘crime’ numatradição musical das periferias. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, 56, 43–72. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-901X.v0i56p43-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feltran, G. (2011). Fronteiras de tensão : política e violência nas periferias de São Paulo. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.

  30. Feltran, G. (2010). Periferias, direito e diferença: notas de uma ethnografia urbana. Revista de Antropologia, 53(2), 565–610. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2010.37711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Feltran, G. (2008). Fronteiras de tensão : um estudo sobre política e violência nas periferias de São Paulo (Doctoral dissertation, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil).

  32. Ferreira, M. (2018). Brazilian criminal organizations as transnational violent non-state actors: A case study of the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC). Trends in Organized Crime, 22(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-018-9354-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gledhill, J. (2015). The new war on the poor: The production of insecurity in Latin America. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Guimarães, A. P. (1982). As classes perigosas. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Human Rights Watch. (2009). Lethal force: Police violence and public security in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. New York: Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2009/12/08/lethal-force/police-violence-and-public-security-rio-de-janeiro-and-sao-paulo. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  36. Human Rights Watch. (1997). Police brutality in urban Brazil. New York: Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1997/brazil/. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  37. Koonings, K., & Kruijt, D. (1999). Introduction: Violence and fear in Latin America. In K. Koonings & D. Kruijt (Eds.), Societies of fear: The legacy of civil war, violence and terror in Latin America (pp. 1–30). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maheirie, K., Almir Aragon, L., & Bruniere, M. F. (2017). A produção de uma máquina de guerra na criação estética do RAP. Quadernos de Psicologia, 19(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Manso, B. (2009). Um debate sobre o PCC : entrevista com Dias, C. N., Feltran G. de S., Marques, A. e Biondi, K. Revista de Antropologia Social dos Alunos do PPGAS-UFSCar, 1(2), 154–175.

  40. Marques, A. (2010). ‘Liderança’, ‘proceder’ e ‘igualdade’ : uma etnografia das relações políticas no Primeiro Comando da Capital. Etnográfica, 14(2), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.303.

  41. Marques, A. (2009). Crime, proceder, convívio-seguro : um experimento antropológico a partir de relacões entre ladrões. MA disseration: University of São Paulo.

  42. Marques, A. (2008). Faxina e pilotagem : dispositivos (de guerra) políticos no seio da administração prisional. Lugar comum, 25(26), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.303.

  43. Mesquita Neto, P. (2011). Ensaio sobre segurança cidadã. São Paulo: Fapesp.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mingardi, G. (2007). O trabalho da inteligência no controle do Crime Organizado. Estudos Avançados, 21(61), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142007000300004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Misse, M. (1995). Crime e probreza : velhos enfoques, novos problemas. In M. A. Gonçalves & G. Villas-Boas (Eds.), O Brasil na virada do século (pp. 78–89). Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumara.

  46. Napolitano, M. (2010). MPB : a trilha da abertura politica (1975–1982). Estudos Avançados, 4(69), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142010000200024.

  47. Nunes Dias, C. (2013). PCC : hegemonia nas prisões e monopólio da Violência. São Paulo: Saraiva.

  48. O’Donnell, G. (1989). Transitions to democracy: Some navigation instruments. In R. Pastor (Ed.), Democracy in the Americas: Stop** the pendulum (pp. 62–75). New York: Holmes and Meir.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). Information note, Brazil: UN experts welcome regional court decision on Herzog case.https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Truth/HerzogCase_EN.docx. Accessed Oct 5, 2019.

  50. Pearce, J. V. (2010). Perverse state formation and securitized democracy in Latin America. Democratization, 17(2), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510341003588716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement, politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rancière, J., Panagia, D., & Bowlby, R. (2001). Ten theses on politics. Theory and Event, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028.

  53. Revista Forum. (2012). “Eu não sou porta-voz do PCC,” diz Dexter em resposta ao UOL. https://www.revistaforum.com.br/eu-nao-sou-porta-voz-do-pcc-diz-dexter-em-resposta-ao-uol/. Accessed October 5, 2019.

  54. Souza, F. (2007). PCC, a facção. Rio de Janeiro: Record.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Teixeira, A. (2012). Construir a delinquência, articular a criminalidade : um estudo sobre a gestão dos ilegalismos na cidade de São Paulo. PhD dissertation, University of São Paulo.

  56. Thorstensen Possas, M. (2012). La démocratie et les paradoxes du discours sur la torture au Brésil. Criminologie, 45(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.7202/1008380ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vianna, H. (1995). O mistério do samba. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar/UFRJ.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Fonds de recherche du Québec—Société et culture under postdoctoral grant [number 257179].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit Décary-Secours.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Décary-Secours, B. The politics of criminal violence in Brazil: State violence, gang and the plebs. Crime Law Soc Change 76, 525–541 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09940-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09940-7

Navigation