SpringerLink
Log in

Make a Difference in a Different Way: Twitter Bot Creators and Wikipedia Transparency.

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Software robots (bots) are a major part of contemporary Internet culture, employed by businesses for customer service, artists for digital expression, and ‘bad actors’ for misinformation. A recent line of Twitter bots, known as WikiEdits bots, has attempted to increase information transparency on the online encyclopedia Wikipedia. This study expands on previous work on Twitter bots by investigating the motivations and experiences of the developers who created bots that monitor Wikipedia for edits made by government bodies and other primary stakeholders. Thirteen qualitative interviews were conducted with a global sample of WikiEdits contributors, revealing various opinions on the successes, shortcomings, and significance of the project. The data reveal that participants hold a high level of computer and programming literacy, and while some creators were driven by activist ideals, others used the project more as a personal technical challenge. This study contributes to CSCW’s interest in how activism is materialized, enabled, and constrained by examining the ways in which a loose network of developers with various motivations use platform affordances to highlight data transparency possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi, Navid; Mehdi Jazayeri; Francesco Lelli; and Sasa Nesic (2008). A survey of social software engineering. In: ASE ‘08: Proceedings of the 2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, L’Aquila, Italy, 15 – 19 September 2008. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-12.

  • Alexa (2020). The Top 500 Sites on the Web. https://www.alexa.com/topsites. .

  • Baack, Stefan (2018). Civic tech at mySociety: How the imagined affordances of data shape data activism,’ Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, vol.1, pp. 44-55.

  • Beutler, William (2019). What happened to CongressEdits? The thrilling life and untold death of Twitter’s most important Wikipedia bot,’ The Wikipedian, http://thewikipedian.net/2019/01/17/congressedits-twitter-suspended/. .

  • Beyer, Jessica L (2013). The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland,’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 19, pp. 141-154.

  • Brabham, Daren C. (2010). Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participating in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1122-1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2006). The search for meanings—Grounded theory. In: J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (eds): Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage, pp. 27-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Judeth; James Herbselb; Jessica Hammer; and Jodi Forlizzi (2020). Identity-based roles in rhizomatic social justice movements on Twitter. In: ICWSM-2020: Proceedings from the Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Atlanta, United States, 8 – 11 June 2020. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, pp. 488-498.

  • Dimond, Jill; Casey Fiesler; Betsy DiSalvo; Jon Pelc; and Amy Bruckman (2012). Qualitative data collection technologies: A comparison of instant messaging, email, and phone. In: GROUP ‘12: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, United States, 27 – 31 October 2012. New York: ACM Press, pp. 277-280.

  • Documenting the Now (2021). At https://www.docnow.io, accessed 2 February 2021.

  • Ferrario, Maria Angela; Will Simm; Peter Newman; Stephen Forshaw; and Jon Whittle (2014). Software engineering for ‘Social Good’: Integrating action research, participatory design, and agile development. In: ICSE Companion ‘14: Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Hyderabad, India, 31 May – 7 June 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 520-523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, Ed (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Heather; Elizabeth Dubois; and Cornelius Puschmann (2016). Kee** Ottawa honest—One tweet at a time? Politicians, journalists, Wikipedians, and their Twitter bots. International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, pp. 4891-4914.

  • Forelle, Michelle; Phil Howard; Andres Monroy-Hernandez; and Saiph Savage (2015). Political bots and the manipulation of public opinion in Venezuela. Journal Article. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.07109. .

  • Freelon, Deen; Charlton McIlwain; and Meredith Clark (2016). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 990-1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geib, Stefan; Melanie Leidecker; and Thomas Roessing (2016). The interplay between media-for-monitoring and media-for-searching: How news media trigger searches and edits in Wikipedia. New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2740-2759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. Stuart (2011). The lives of bots. In: G. Lovink and N. Tkacz (eds): Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, pp. 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. Stuart (2016). Bot-based collective blocklists in Twitter: The counterpublic moderation of harassment in a networked public space. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 787-803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GitHub (2020). Edsu/anon. https://github.com/edsu/anon, .

  • Greenstein, Shane; and Feng Zhu (2018). Do experts or crowd-based models produce more bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia. MIS Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 945-959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobel, Sascha; and Simon Munzert (2018). Political advertising on the Wikipedia marketplace of information. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 157-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, Miren (2018). Data Activism and Social Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, Miren; and Stefania Milan (2019). Playing with data and its consequences. First Monday, vol. 24, no. 1.

  • Halavais, Alexander; and Derek Lackaff (2008). An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia,’ Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 13, pp. 429-440.

  • Haustein, Stefanie; Timothy D. Bowman; Kim Holmberg; Andrew Tsou; Cassidy R. Sugimoto; and Vincent Lariviere (2014). Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated ‘bot’ accounts on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 67, no 1, pp. 232-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Tim; Ian Pearce; and Max Nanis (2012). Socialbots: Voices from the fronts. Interactions, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 38-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Steve (2015). How I learned to stop worrying and love the bots. Social Media + Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Tim (2017). A genealogy of hacking. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 528-544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, Victor (ed) (2006). The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalla, Joshua L.; and Peter M. Aronow (2015). Editorial bias in crowd-sourced political information,’ PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 9.

  • Kazmer, Michelle M.; and Bo **e (2008). Qualitative interviewing in Internet Studies: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 257-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollanyi, Bence (2016). Where do bots come from? An analysis of bot codes shared on GitHub. International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, 2016, pp. 4932-4951.

  • Kozinets, Robert V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John (1992). Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 379-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Evan (2006). Rewriting history under the Dome,’ Lowell Sun, 27 January 2006. http://www.lowellsun.com/ci_3444567. .

  • Leonard, Andrew (1997). Bots: The Origin of New Species. San Francisco: Hardwired.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindlof, Thomas R.; and Bryan C. Taylor (2017). Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Randall M. (2014). Immaterial editors: Bots and bot policies across global Wikipedia. In P. Fichman; and N. Hara (eds) : Global Wikipedia: International and Cross-Cultural Issues in Online Collaboration. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow, pp. 7-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Randall M. (2015). Models for understanding collective intelligence on Wikipedia. Social Science Computer Review, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 497-508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokot, Tetyana; and Nicholas Diakopoulos (2015). News bots: Automating news and information dissemination on Twitter. Digital Journalism, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, Fannie; Denae Ford; Chris Parnin; and Laura Dabbish (2017). Selfies as social movements: Influences on participation and perceived impact on stereotypes. Proceedings from the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. CSCW, pp. 1-21.

  • Markham, Annette N.; and Nancy K. Baym (2009). Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milan, Stefania; and Lonneke van der Velden (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosendz, Polly (2014). Congressional IP address blocked from making edits to Wikipedia. The Atlantic, 24 July 2014), https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/07/congressional-ip-address-blocked-from-making-edits-to-wikipedia/374997/. Accessed 2 May 2019.

  • Neff, Jennifer J.; David Laniado; Karolin E. Kappler; Yana Volkovich; Pablo Aragon; and Andreas Kaltenbrunner (2013). Jointly they edit: Examining the impact of community identification on political interaction on Wikipedia. PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4.

  • Niederer, Sabine; and Jose van Dijck (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1368-1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, Yuki (2006). Wikipedia’s help from the Hill. Washington Post, 9 February 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/08/AR2006020802212.html. .

  • Pearce, Gemma; Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani; and Joan L. Duda (2014). The development of synchronous text-based instant messaging as an online interviewing tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 677-692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillip, Abby (2014). Your tax dollars are hard at work…Editing the ‘Horse head mask’ page on Wikipedia. Washington Post, 10 July 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/07/10/your-tax-dollars-are-hard-at-work-editing-the-horse-head-mask-page-on-wikipedia/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bfcc99fc58a6. .

  • Powell, Alison (2016). Hacking in the public interest: Authority, legitimacy, means, and ends. New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 600-616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reagle, Joseph; and Lauren Rhue (2011). Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication, vol. 5, pp. 1138-1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, Mark (2014). A protest bot is a bot so specific you can’t mistake it for bullshit. Medium. https://medium.com/@samplereality/a-protest-bot-is-a-bot-so-specific-you-cant-mistake-it-for-bullshit-90fe10b7fbaa. .

  • Schrock, Andrew R. (2016). Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 581-599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieger, Stefan; and Anja S. Goritz (2006). Using instant messaging for Internet-based interviews. CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 552-559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, Margaret-Anne; Leif Singer; Brednan Cleary; Fernando F. Filho; and Alexey Zagalsky (2014). The (R)evolution of social media in software engineering. In: FOSE 2014: Future of Software Engineering Proceedings, Hyderabad, India, 31 May – 7 June 2014. New York: ACM Press, pp. 100-116..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, Margaret-Anne; Alexey Zagalsky; Fernando F. Filho; Leif Singer; and Daniel M. German (2017). How social and communication channels shape and challenge a participatory culture in software development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 43, no. 2. February 2017, pp. 185-204.

  • Summers, Ed (2014). Why @congressedits?. https://inkdroid.org/2014/07/10/why-congressedits/. .

  • Taylor, Paul A. (2005). From hackers to hacktivists: Speed bumps on the global superhighway? New Media & Society, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 625-646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetkova, Milena; Ruth Garcia-Gavilanes; Luciano Floridi; and Taha Yasseri (2017). Even good bots fight: The case of Wikipedia. PLOS One, vol. 12, no. 2.

  • Varol, Onur; Emilio Ferrara; Clayton A. Davis; Filippo Menczer; and Alessandro Flammini (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. In: ICWSM ‘17: Proceedings from the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Montreal, Canada, 15 – 18 May 2017. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, pp. 280-289.

  • Weill, Kelly (2015). Edits to Wikipedia pages on Bell, Garner, Diallo traced to 1 Police Plaza. Politico, 13 March 2015. https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2015/03/edits-to-wikipedia-pages-on-bell-garner-diallo-traced-to-1-police-plaza-087652. Accessed 24 March 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endicott College, 376 Hale Street, Beverly, MA, 01915, USA

    Randall M. Livingstone

Authors
  1. Randall M. Livingstone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall M. Livingstone.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Livingstone, R.M. Make a Difference in a Different Way: Twitter Bot Creators and Wikipedia Transparency.. Comput Supported Coop Work 30, 733–756 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09411-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09411-6

Key Words:

Search

Navigation