SpringerLink
Log in

Less contrast-enhanced areas within lymph nodes in the delayed phase of contrast-enhanced MRI: a suspicious finding for lymph node metastases

  • Letters to the Editor
  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Data availability statement

No data was used for this letter to the editor.

References

  1. Sakamoto M, Kojima I, Iikubo M et al (2022) Perfusion defects in non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes using vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging: Detection performance and diagnostic value. Clin Exp Metastasis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10147-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mori N, Mugikura S, Miyashita M et al (2019) Perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict early lymph-node metastasis in breast cancer. Japanese J Radiol 37:145–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0792-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Toki A, Niikura H, Mori N et al (2021) Establishment of a Diagnostic Method for Pelvic Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Uterine Cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol S0301562921001617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.040

  4. Scaranelo AM, Eiada R, Jacks LM et al (2012) Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis: study of reproducibility and reliability. Radiology 262:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chikui T, Yonetsu K, Nakamura T (2000) Multivariate Feature Analysis of Sonographic Findings of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes: Contribution of Blood Flow Features Revealed by Power Doppler Sonography for Predicting Metastasis. 7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Seiryo 1-1, 980-8574, Sendai, Japan

    Naoko Mori, Shunji Mugikura & Kei Takase

  2. Division of Image Statistics, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Seiryo 2-1, 980-8574, Sendai, Japan

    Shunji Mugikura

Authors
  1. Naoko Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shunji Mugikura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kei Takase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Mori.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, N., Mugikura, S. & Takase, K. Less contrast-enhanced areas within lymph nodes in the delayed phase of contrast-enhanced MRI: a suspicious finding for lymph node metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 39, 713–714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10161-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10161-y

Search

Navigation