SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogen Production from Methane with CO2 Utilization over Exsolution Derived Bimetallic NiCu/CeO2 Catalysts

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrogen production from methane with CO2 utilization over exsolution derived NiCu/CeO2 catalysts was studied. To form highly dispersed supported bimetallic NiCu particles the Ce0.75(NiCu)0.25O1.75 catalyst precursors (Cu/Ni molar ratio = 0; 0.004; 0.04; 0.25) were prepared by polymerizable complex method with the following reduction at 800 °C. A comparative study of the genesis, textural, structural and morphological properties of materials has been carried out by ex situ and in situ methods. It was shown that Ce0.75(NiCu)0.25O1.75 samples were fluorite-like ceria-based solid solutions with a mesoporous texture. Copper promotion has a positive effect on self-activation and hydrogen yield by improving the reducibility of the catalyst, lowering the exsolution temperature of the Ni2+ cations, and maintaining the concentration of oxygen vacancies. The catalyst of optimal composition NiCu/CeO2 (9.4 wt. % Ni, 0.4 wt. % Cu) formed from Ce0.75(NiCu)0.25O1.75 with Cu/Ni = 0.04 is resistant to coking and provides high hydrogen yield (82%) and CO2 utilization (78%) in steam/CO2 reforming of methane at 850 °C.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Hydrogen Review 2022 (2022) IEA. https://doi.org/10.1787/a15b8442-en. Accessed 25 April 2023

  2. Ismagilov ZR, Matus EV, Li L (2022) Catalytic methods of converting carbon dioxide into useful products to reduce the impact of coal generation on global climate change. Phys Usp 65:1139–1154. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2021.07.039084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Energy Technology Perspectives (2020)—Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage (2020) IEA https://doi.org/10.1787/208b66f4-en.

  4. Zhu Q (2019) Developments on CO2-utilization technologies. Clean Energy 3:85–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkz008.Accessed25April2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quarton CJ, Samsatli S (2020) The value of hydrogen and carbon capture, storage and utilisation in decarbonising energy: insights from integrated value chain optimisation. Appl Energy 257:113936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu M, Wang K, Vredenburg H (2021) Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: green, blue and aqua hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:21261–21273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen J, Han J, Xu D (2019) Efficient operation of autothermal microchannel reactors for the production of hydrogen by steam methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:11546–11563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cloete S, Khan MN, Amini S (2019) Economic assessment of membrane-assisted autothermal reforming for cost effective hydrogen production with CO2 capture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:3492–3510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rau F, Herrmann A, Krause H, Fino D, Trimis D (2019) Efficiency of a pilot-plant for the autothermal reforming of biogas. Int J Hydrogen Energy 4:19135–19140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismagilov IZ, Vosmerikov AV, Korobitsyna LL, Matus EV, Kerzhentsev MA, Stepanov AA et al (2021) Promoters for improvement of the catalyst performance in methane valorization processes. Eurasian Chem J 23:147–168. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ismagilov ZR, Matus EV, Ismagilov IZ, Sukhova OB, Yashnik SA, Ushakov VA et al (2019) Hydrogen production through hydrocarbon fuel reforming processes over Ni based catalysts. Catal Today 323:166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.06.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang E-H, Noh YS, Hong GH, Moon DJ (2018) Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane over La1-xSrxNiO3 perovskite oxides. Catal Today 299:242–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhang G, Liu J, Dou L, Xu Y et al (2022) Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane over Co–Ce/AC-N catalyst: effect of preparation methods on catalyst activity and stability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:2914–2925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin YS, Tu JY, Tsai DH (2021) Steam-promoted methane-CO2 reforming by NiPdCeOx@SiO2 nanoparticle clusters for syngas production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:25103–25113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matus E, Sukhova O, Kerzhentsev M, Ismagilov I, Yashnik S, Ushakov V et al (2022) Hydrogen production through Bi-reforming of methane: improving Ni catalyst performance via an exsolution approach. Catalysts 12:1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/CATAL12121493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matus EV, Sukhova OB, Ismagilov IZ, Ushakov VA, Yashnik SA, Kerzhentsev MA et al (2022) Steam/CO2 reforming of methane over impregnated Ni/CeO2 catalysts: effect of sample composition on their activity and stability. Eurasian Chem J 24:191–202. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Paladino Lino AV, Rodella CB, Assaf EM, Assaf JM (2020) Methane tri-reforming for synthesis gas production using Ni/CeZrO2/MgAl2O4 catalysts: effect of Zr/Ce molar ratio. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:8418–8432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu KT, Yu CT, Chein RY (2017) Numerical modeling on catalytic tri-reforming reaction of methane for syngas production. Energy Procedia 105:4198–4203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar R, Pant KK (2020) Hydrotalcite-derived Ni–Zn–Mg–Al catalyst for Tri-reforming of methane: effect of divalent to trivalent metal ratio and Ni loading. Fuel Process Technol 210:106559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oni AO, Anaya K, Giwa T, Di Lullo G, Kumar A (2022) Comparative assessment of blue hydrogen from steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming, and natural gas decomposition technologies for natural gas-producing regions. Energy Convers Manag 254:115245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson Matthey Group. LCHTM Process for the production of blue hydrogen 2022. https://matthey.com/documents/161599/474986/26367+JM+LCH+Process+-+Production+of+Low+Carbon+Hydrogen+TP+%28screen%29+13.pdf/71bb11a0-47ce-e609-412b-0678b1b4e5da?t=1654695668629. Accessed 25 April 2023

  22. Smaller carbon footprint. Higher process efficiency. https://www.engineering.linde.com/dryref. Accessed 25 April 2023

  23. de Medeiros FGM, Lopes FWB, Rego de Vasconcelos B (2022) Prospects and technical challenges in hydrogen production through dry reforming of methane. Catalysts 12:363. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12040363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wittich K, Krämer M, Bottke N, Schunk SA (2020) Catalytic dry reforming of methane: insights from model systems. ChemCatChem 12:2130–2147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matus EV, Ismagilov ZR (2022) Promising directions in chemical processing of methane from coal industry. Part 1. Thermodynamic analysis. Eurasian Chem J 24:203–214. https://doi.org/10.18321/ectj1433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson Matthey. Ammonia plant performance 2018. https://matthey.com/documents/161599/440146/JM+Ammonia+plant+performance+%28c2019%29.pdf/0dd39f7a-fbcc-7211-5230-c1d70678e6f1?t=1653488107209. Accessed 25 April 2023

  27. Pinaeva LG, Noskov AS (2021) The modern level of catalysts and technologies for natural gas conversion to syngas. Katal v Promyshlennosti 21:308–330. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2021-5-308-330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. TOPSOE: Hydrogen. Reforming. https://www.topsoe.com/processes/hydrogen/reforming. Accessed 25 April 2023

  29. Fowles M, Carlsson M (2021) Steam reforming of hydrocarbons for synthesis gas production. Top Catal 64:856–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-021-01496-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Snoeck J-W, Froment GF, Fowles M (2002) Steam/CO2 reforming of methane. Carbon filament formation by the boudouard reaction and gasification by CO2, by H2, and by steam: kinetic study. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4252–4265. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010666h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carlsson M (2015) Carbon formation in steam reforming and effect of potassium promotion. Johnson Matthey Technol Rev 59:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1595/205651315X688992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sehested J, Gelten JAP, Helveg S (2006) Sintering of nickel catalysts: effects of time, atmosphere, temperature, nickel-carrier interactions, and dopants. Appl Catal A Gen 309:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Morales-Cano F, Lundegaard LF, Tiruvalam RR, Falsig H, Skjøth-Rasmussen MS (2015) Improving the sintering resistance of Ni/Al2O3 steam-reforming catalysts by promotion with noble metals. Appl Catal A Gen 498:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheephat C, Daorattanachai P, Devahastin S, Laosiripojana N (2018) Partial oxidation of methane over monometallic and bimetallic Ni-, Rh-, Re-based catalysts: effects of Re addition, co-fed reactants and catalyst support. Appl Catal A Gen 563:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.06.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ismagilov IZ, Matus EV, Kuznetsov VV, Kerzhentsev MA, Yashnik SA, Prosvirin IP et al (2014) Hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of methane over NiPd catalysts: effect of support composition and preparation mode. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:20992–21006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohamedali M, Henni A, Ibrahim H (2018) Recent advances in supported metal catalysts for syngas production from methane. ChemEngineering 2:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering2010009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Li D, Nakagawa Y, Tomishige K (2011) Methane reforming to synthesis gas over Ni catalysts modified with noble metals. Appl Catal A Gen 408:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.09.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Miyata T, Li D, Shiraga M, Shishido T, Oumi Y, Sano T et al (2006) Promoting effect of Rh, Pd and Pt noble metals to the Ni/Mg(Al)O catalysts for the DSS-like operation in CH4 steam reforming. Appl Catal A Gen 310:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kerzhentsev MA, Matus EV, Rundau IA, Kuznetsov VV, Ismagilov IZ, Ushakov VA et al (2017) Development of a Ni–Pd/CeZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst for the effective conversion of methane into hydrogen-containing gas. Kinet Catal 58:601–622. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002315841705010X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bengaard HS, Nørskov JK, Sehested J, Clausen BS, Nielsen LP, Molenbroek AM et al (2002) Steam reforming and graphite formation on Ni catalysts. J Catal 209:365–384. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Sehested J, Noerskov JK (2003) Hydrogen and synthesis gas by steam- and CO2 reforming. Adv Catal 47:65–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.200317288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ismagilov IZ, Matus EV, Kuznetsov VV, Mota N, Navarro RM, Yashnik SA et al (2014) Hydrogen production by autothermal reforming of methane: effect of promoters (Pt, Pd, Re, Mo, Sn) on the performance of Ni/La2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 481:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.04.042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yao Y, Goodman DW (2014) Direct evidence of hydrogen spillover from Ni to Cu on Ni–Cu bimetallic catalysts. J Mol Catal A Chem 283–284:239–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.12.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bobadilla LF, Romero-Sarria F, Centeno MA, Odriozola JA (2016) Promoting effect of Sn on supported Ni catalyst during steam reforming of glycerol. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:9234–9244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dedov AG, Loktev AS, Mukhin IE, Baranchikov AE, Ivanov VK, Bykov MA et al (2019) Effect of the support nature on stability of nickel and nickel–cobalt catalysts for partial oxidation and dry reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Pet Chem 59:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544119040042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chatla A, Ghouri MM, El Hassan OW, Mohamed N, Prakash AV, Elbashir NO (2020) An experimental and first principles DFT investigation on the effect of Cu addition to Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for the dry reforming of methane. Appl Catal A Gen 602:117699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Nataj SMM, Alavi SM, Mazloom G (2018) Modeling and optimization of methane dry reforming over Ni–Cu/Al2O3 catalyst using Box-Behnken design. J Energy Chem 27:1475–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Matus EV, Shlyakhtina AS, Sukhova OB, Ismagilov IZ, Ushakov VA, Yashnik SA et al (2019) Effect of preparation methods on the physicochemical and functional properties of Ni/CeO2 catalysts. Kinet Catal 60:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002315841902006X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kerzhentsev MA, Matus EV, Ismagilov IZ, Ushakov VA, Stonkus OA, Larina TV et al (2017) Structural and morphological properties of Ce1–xMxOy (M = Gd, La, Mg) supports for the catalysts of autothermal ethanol conversion. J Struct Chem 58:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002247661701019X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Melchionna M, Trovarelli A, Fornasiero P (2020) Synthesis and properties of cerium oxide-based materials. Elsevier Inc. 13–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815661-2.00002-5.

  51. Montini T, Melchionna M, Monai M, Fornasiero P (2016) Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2-based materials. Chem Rev 116:5987–6041. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Guo M, Lu J, Wu Y, Wang Y, Luo M (2011) UV and visible Raman studies of oxygen vacancies in rare-earth-doped ceria. Langmuir 27:3872–3877. https://doi.org/10.1021/la200292f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lever ABP (1984) Inorganic Electron Spectroscopy. second ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam – Oxford – New York – Tokyo.

  54. Wu L, Wiesmann HJ, Moodenbaugh AR, Klie RF, Zhu Y, Welch DO et al (2004) Oxidation state and lattice expansion of CeO2−x nanoparticles as a function of particle size. Phys Rev B 69:125415. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.125415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Marinho ALA, Rabelo-Neto RC, Epron F, Bion N, Toniolo FS, Noronha FB (2020) Embedded Ni nanoparticles in CeZrO2 as stable catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Appl Catal B Environ 268:118387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fuentes RO, Acuña LM, Albornoz CA, Leyva AG, Sousa N, Figueiredo FM (2016) Structural, physical and chemical properties of nanostructured nickel-substituted ceria oxides under reducing and oxidizing conditions. RSC Adv 6:64861–64870. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra14853k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pinto FM, Suzuki VY, Silva RC, La Porta FA (2019) Oxygen defects and surface chemistry of reducible oxides. Front Mater 6:260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2019.00260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Koeppel RA, Baiker A, Wokaun A (1992) Copper/zirconia catalysts for the synthesis of methanol from carbon dioxide. Appl Catal A Gen 84:77–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860X(92)80340-I

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dumas JM, Geron C, Kribii A, Barbier J (1989) Preparation of supported copper catalysts. Appl Catal 47:L9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834(00)83256-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hu Y, Dong L, Shen M, Liu D, Wang J, Ding W et al (2001) Influence of supports on the activities of copper oxide species in the low-temperature NO+CO reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 31:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00269-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Moretti E, Lenarda M, Storaro L, Talon A, Frattini R, Polizzi S et al (2007) Catalytic purification of hydrogen streams by PROX on Cu supported on an organized mesoporous ceria-modified alumina. Appl Catal B Environ 72:149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.10.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Yu Q, Liu L, Dong L, Li D, Liu B, Gao F et al (2010) Effects of Ce/Zr ratio on the reducibility, adsorption and catalytic activity of CuO/CexZr1-xO2/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for NO reduction by CO. Appl Catal B Environ 96:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rodriguez JA, Kim JY, Hanson JC, Pérez M, Frenkel AI (2003) Reduction of CuO in H2: in situ time-resolved XRD studies. Catal Lett 85:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022110200942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lamonier C, Ponchel A, D’Huysser A, Jalowiecki-Duhamel L (1999) Studies of the cerium-metal-oxygen-hydrogen system (metal = Cu, Ni). Catal Today 50:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00507-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Shan W, Luo M, Ying P, Shen W, Li C (2003) Reduction property and catalytic activity of Ce1−xNixO2 mixed oxide catalysts for CH4 oxidation. Appl Catal A Gen 246:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00659-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Vita A, Italiano C, Fabiano C, Laganà M, Pino L (2015) Influence of Ce-precursor and fuel on structure and catalytic activity of combustion synthesized Ni/CeO2 catalysts for biogas oxidative steam reforming. Mater Chem Phys 163:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Shen H, Li H, Yang Z, Li C (2022) Magic of hydrogen spillover: understanding and application. Green Energy Environ 7:1161–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2022.01.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the governmental order for the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis. The XRD, UV–Vis DRS and TEM studies were carried out using facilities of the shared research center “National center of investigation of catalysts” at the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis. The authors also acknowledge the resource center “VTAN” (Novosibirsk State University) for the access to TEM equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Pr. Lavrentieva 5, Novosibirsk, Russia, 630090

    E. V. Matus, O. B. Sukhova, M. A. Kerzhentsev, I. Z. Ismagilov, S. A. Yashnik, V. A. Ushakov, T. V. Larina, E. Yu. Gerasimov, O. A. Stonkus & Z. R. Ismagilov

  2. Federal Research Center of Coal and Coal Chemistry SB RAS, Pr. Sovetsky 18, Kemerovo, Russia, 650000

    A. P. Nikitin & Z. R. Ismagilov

  3. Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 27th South Taoyuan Road, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, People’s Republic of China

    L. Li

Authors
  1. E. V. Matus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. B. Sukhova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. A. Kerzhentsev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Z. Ismagilov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. A. Yashnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. V. A. Ushakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. V. Larina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Yu. Gerasimov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. O. A. Stonkus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. A. P. Nikitin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. L. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Z. R. Ismagilov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Matus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Notes

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matus, E.V., Sukhova, O.B., Kerzhentsev, M.A. et al. Hydrogen Production from Methane with CO2 Utilization over Exsolution Derived Bimetallic NiCu/CeO2 Catalysts. Catal Lett 154, 2197–2210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-023-04454-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-023-04454-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation