Log in

Assessment of Text Coherence by Constructing the Graph of Semantic, Lexical, and Grammatical Consistancy of Phrases of Sentences

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The graph-based method of coherence assessment of texts based on the analysis of semantic, grammatical, and lexical consistency of sentence phrases has been suggested. The experimental verification of the efficiency of the method has been performed on the English-language corpora. The metrics obtained can indicate that the suggested method outperforms other modern approaches. The method can be applied to other languages by replacing the linguistic models according to the features of a certain language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Z. Kurdi, Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics 2: Semantics, Discourse and Applications, Wiley-ISTE (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Poulimenou, S. Stamou, S. Papavlasopoulos, and M. Poulos, “Short text coherence hypothesis,” J. of Quantitative Linguistics, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, 191–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1142328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O. O. Marchenko, O. S. Radyvonenko, T. S. Ignatova, P. V. Titarchuk, and D. V. Zhelezniakov, “Improving text generation through introducing coherence metrics,” Cybern. Syst. Analysis, Vol. 56, No. 1, 13–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00216-x.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Pogorilyy and A. Kramov, “Automated extraction of structured information from a variety of web pages,” in: Proc. 11th International Conference of Programming UkrPROG 2018 (Kyiv, Ukraine, 22–24 May, 2018), Kyiv (2018), pp. 149–158.

  5. R. Barzilay and M. Lapata, “Modeling local coherence: an entity-based approach,” Computational Linguistics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1–34 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2008.34.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mesgar and M. Strube, “Normalized entity graph for computing local coherence,” in: Proc. TextGraphs-9: The Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing (Doha, Quatar, 29 Oct, 2014) (2014), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-3701.

  7. J. Li and E. Hovy, “A model of coherence based on distributed sentence representation,” in: Proc. 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (Doha, Quatar, 25–29 Oct, 2014) (2014), pp. 2039–2048. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1218.

  8. B. Cui, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Text coherence analysis based on deep neural network,” in: Proc. 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’17) (Singapore, 6–10 Nov, 2017) (2017), pp. 2027–2030. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3133047.

  9. J. W. G. Putra and T. Tokunaga, “Evaluating text coherence based on semantic similarity graph,” in: Proc. TextGraphs-11: The Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing (Vancouver, Canada, 3 Nov, 2017) (2017), pp. 76–85. 2017. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-2410.

  10. G. Giray and M. O. Ünalír, “Assessment of text coherence using an ontology-based relatedness measurement method,” Expert Systems, Vol. 37, Iss. 3, 1–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Bohn, Y. Hu, J. Zhang, and C. X. Ling, “Learning sentence embeddings for coherence modelling and beyond,” in: Proc. Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (Varna, Bulgaria, 2–4 Sept, 2019) (2019), pp. 151–160. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_018.

  12. G. Angeli, M. J. J. Premkumar, and C. Manning, “Leveraging linguistic structure for open domain information extraction,” in: Proc. 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Vol. 1: Long Papers) (Bei**g, China, 26–31 July, 2015) (2015), pp. 344–354. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/p15-1034.

  13. S. Pogorilyy and A. Kramov, “Coreference resolution method using a convolutional neural network,” in: Proc. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT) (Kyiv, Ukraine, 18–20 Dec, 2019) (2019), pp. 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030596.

  14. Q. Le and T. Mikolov, “Distributed representations of sentences and documents,” in: Proc. 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (Bei**g, China, 21–26 June, 2014); JMLR, Vol. 32 (2014), pp. 1188–1196e.

  15. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality,” in: NIPS’13: Proc. 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Lake Tahoe, Nevada, USA, 5–8 Dec, 2013), Vol. 2 (2013), pp. 3111–3119.

  16. T. Mikolov, E. Grave, P. Bojanowski, C. Puhrsch, A. Joulin, “Advances in pre-training distributed word representations,” in: Proc. Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (Miyazaki, Japan, 7–12 May, 2018) (2018), pp. 52–55.

  17. S. Pogorilyy and A. Kramov, “Method of the coherence evaluation of Ukrainian text,” Data Recording, Storage & Processing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 64–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.35681/1560-9189.2018.20.4.178945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OntoNotes Release 5.0, Linguistic Data Consortium (2020). URL: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2013T19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Pogorilyy.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 6, November–December, 2020, pp. 38–45.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pogorilyy, S.D., Kramov, A.A. Assessment of Text Coherence by Constructing the Graph of Semantic, Lexical, and Grammatical Consistancy of Phrases of Sentences. Cybern Syst Anal 56, 893–899 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00309-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-020-00309-7

Keywords

Navigation