Log in

Assessing the prevalence and predicting factors of an abnormal gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the significant prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia and its related morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients, it is not well known whether early screening with MPI is cost-effective and predicting factors are not well elucidated. This was a cross-sectional study including 63 asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with normal ECG and ejection fraction. Patients with any history of documented valvular, congestive or ischemic heart disease, renal or hepatic failure were excluded. At first all patients were interviewed and checked for risk factors and then patients underwent a two-day rest/stress 99mTc-MIBI gated MPI SPECT. Data was assessed by QPS/QGS and 4DM software and evaluated by a nuclear medicine specialist with summed stress score (SSS) of more than 4 defined as CAD. There were 42 females (67%) and 21 males (33%), with a mean age of 61.33 ± 6.98 years and 7.97 ± 4.86 years history of T2DM. CAD was detected in 26 (41.3%) patients and was significantly associated with male gender, smoking and requiring insulin therapy (P-value = 0.019, 0.046, 0.05, respectively). A significant association was found between the duration of diabetes, especially when > 15 years, and the probability of having CAD. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that smoking; male gender and diabetes duration were the strongest independent predictors of abnormal MPI results. We found a high (46%) prevalence of abnormal stress MPI SPECT in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, despite being asymptomatic. Asymptomatic patients with a history of smoking, long duration of diabetes, being under insulin treatment and male gender might benefit from MPI for early detection of silent ischemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boiten HJ, van Domburg RT, Valkema R, Zijlstra F, Schinkel AF (2016) Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging: 8-year outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J-Cardiovasc Imaging 17:871–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zellweger MJ, Haaf P, Maraun M, Osterhues HH, Keller U, Müller-Brand J, Jeger R, Pfister O, Brinkert M, Burkard T (2017) Predictors and prognostic impact of silent coronary artery disease in asymptomatic high-risk patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiol 244:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinrauch L, D’eliaHealyGleasonTakacsLibertinoLeland JRRFJO Jr (1978) Asymptomatic coronary artery disease: angiography in diabetic patients before renal transplantation: relation of findings to postoperative survival. Ann Intern Med 88:346–348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitevska IP, Baneva N, Srbinovska E, Stojanovska L, Apostolopoulos V, Bosevski M (2017) Prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium score in a Macedonian cohort of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 14:285–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fishman SL, Sonmez H, Basman C, Singh V, Poretsky L (2018) The role of advanced glycation end-products in the development of coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a review. Mol Med 24:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naito R, Miyauchi K (2017) Coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus current treatment strategies and future perspective. Int Heart J 58:17–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanchez-Alcoholado L, Castellano-Castillo D, Jordán-Martínez L, Moreno-Indias I, Cardila-Cruz P, Elena D, Muñoz-Garcia AJ, Queipo-Ortuño MI, Jimenez-Navarro M (2017) Role of gut microbiota on cardio-metabolic parameters and immunity in coronary artery disease patients with and without type-2 diabetes mellitus. Front Microbiol 8:1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim T-H, Yang P-S, Uhm J-S, Kim J-Y, Pak H-N, Lee M-H, Joung B, Lip GY (2017) CHA2DS2-VASc score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 [doubled], diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack [doubled], vascular disease, age 65–74, female) for stroke in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: a Korean nationwide sample cohort study. Stroke 48:1524–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiersma JJ, Verberne HJ, Trip MD, Wik L, van Eck-Smit BL, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG (2006) Prevalence of myocardial ischaemia as assessed with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and mild anginal symptoms. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:1468–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morales DCV, Bhavnani SP, Ahlberg AW, Pullatt RC, Katten DM, Polk DM, Heller GV (2019) Coronary risk equivalence of diabetes assessed by SPECT-MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 26:1093–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Colon CM, Marshell RL, Roth CP, Farag AA, Iskandrian AE, Hage FG (2019) The prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. J Nucl Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01915-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Acampa W, Assante R, Zampella E, Petretta M, Cuocolo A (2019) Myocardial perfusion imaging for diabetes: key points from the evidence and clinical questions to be answered. J Nucl Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01846-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Makrilakis K, Liatis S (2017) Cardiovascular screening for the asymptomatic patient with diabetes: more cons than pros. J Diabetes Res 2017:8927473. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8927473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller TD, Shaw LJ (2009) Risk stratification in diabetic patients: a continuing challenge. J Nucl Cardiol 16:486–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Humaidi G, Sarikaya I, Elgazzar AH, Owunwanne A (2018) Myocardial perfusion abnormalities in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients. J Saudi Heart Assoc 30:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV, Dibbets-Schneider P, Stokkel MP, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2009) Prevalence and predictors of an abnormal stress myocardial perfusion study in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:567–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamasaki Y, Nakajima K, Kusuoka H, Izumi T, Kashiwagi A, Kawamori R, Shimamoto K, Yamada N, Nishimura T (2010) Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: the J-ACCESS 2 investigation. Diabetes Care 33:2320–2326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malek H (2022) Chapter 9 - Nuclear cardiology. In: Maleki M, Alizadehasl A, Haghjoo M (eds) Practical cardiology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, pp 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-80915-3.00040-5

  19. Gimelli A, Achenbach S, Buechel RR, Edvardsen T, Francone M, Gaemperli O, Hacker M, Hyafil F, Kaufmann PA, Lancellotti P (2018) Strategies for radiation dose reduction in nuclear cardiology and cardiac computed tomography imaging: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the Cardiovascular Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), and the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR). Eur Heart J 39:286–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Czaja M, Wygoda Z, Duszańska A, Szczerba D, Głowacki J, GąsiorWasilewski MJP (2017) Interpreting myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using single-photon emission computed tomography. Part I. Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Pol J Cardio-Thorac Surg 14:192–199. https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2017.70534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naghshtabrizi B, Alvandi M, Shaghaghi Z, Hadei SK, Fariba F, Moradi M, Rabie MAS (2021) Transient ischemic dilation or transient RV visualization in patients with normal SPECT stress myocardial perfusion imaging: correlation with CT coronary artery calcium scoring and coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02704-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alama M, Labos C, Emery H, Iwanochko RM, Freeman M, Husain M, Lee DS (2018) Diagnostic and prognostic significance of transient ischemic dilation (TID) in myocardial perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 25:724–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1040-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP (2006) Increased right ventricular uptake on stress SPECT myocardial perfusion images in a patient with severe coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 13:725–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.06.115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oki GCR, Pavin EJ, Coelho OR, Parisi MCR, Almeida RC, EtchebehereCamargoRamos ECSdCEECD (2013) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the detection of silent ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Radiol Bras 46:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohn PF, Fox KM, Daly C (2003) Silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 108:1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prior JO, Monbaron D, Koehli M, Calcagni M-L, Ruiz J, Delaloye AB (2005) Prevalence of symptomatic and silent stress-induced perfusion defects in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawasaki-Ogita Y, Hamamoto Y, Honjo S, Ikeda H, Wada Y, Nomura K, Iwasaki Y, Nohara R, Koshiyama H (2012) The limited usefulness of the treadmill test or a risk-guided approach in screening for asymptomatic coronary heart disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Intern Med 51:3337–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prior JO (2009) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in diabetes: current status and limitations. In: Movahed A, Gnanasegaran G, Buscombe J, Hall M (eds) Integrating cardiology for nuclear medicine physicians. Springer, Berlin, pp 305–323

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Cosson E, Attali J, Valensi P (2005) Markers for silent myocardial ischemia in diabetes. Are they helpful? Diabetes Metab 31:205–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohagheghie A, Ahmadabadi M, Hedayat D, Pourbehi M, Assadi M (2011) Myocardial perfusion imaging using technetium-99m sestamibi in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Nuklearmedizin 50:3–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Lennon L, Sattar N (2011) Impact of diabetes on cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality in older men: influence of age at onset, diabetes duration, and established and novel risk factors. Arch Intern Med 171:404–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Michael R, Vila G, Heinzl M, Luger A, Neuhold S, Prager R, Wurm R, Hülsmann M, Martin C (2021) Cardiovascular risk prediction in diabetes – changes in the prognostic values of modern cardiovascular biomarkers in relation to duration of diabetes mellitus. Res Sq. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-36833/v1

  33. Fox CS, Sullivan L, D’Agostino RB, Wilson PW (2004) The significant effect of diabetes duration on coronary heart disease mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care 27:704–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu Y-T, Chien C-L, Wang S-Y, Yang W-S, Wu Y-W (2013) Gender differences in myocardial perfusion defect in asymptomatic postmenopausal women and men with and without diabetes mellitus. J Womens Health 22:439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salehi Y, Fard-Esfahani A, Fallahi B, Aghahosseini F, Beiki D, Emami-Ardekani A, Fard-Esfahani P, Ansari M, Eftekhari M (2015) The myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Iran J Nucl Med 23:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  36. Malik D, Mittal B, Sood A, Parmar M, Kaur G, Bahl A (2019) Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony assessment in long-standing type II diabetes mellitus patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 26:1650–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of Nuclear Medicine Department of Shohada-e Tajrish Hospital for hel** in collecting relevant data. We also appreciate great efforts of Professor Ramin Sadeghi for improvising our article.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors participated in preparing the manuscript according to the ICMJE authorship criteria.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadali Ghodsirad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseinzadeh, E., Ghodsirad, M., Alirezaie, T. et al. Assessing the prevalence and predicting factors of an abnormal gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 457–464 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02400-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02400-2

Keywords

Navigation