Abstract
To determine whether adiposity assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) compared to simple anthropometric assessments, are more predictive of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a risk factor for atherosclerosis. A cross-sectional study of 312 participants (60.3 % female) aged 70.6 ± 5.6 years was conducted in 2010–2011. AAC was assessed by radiography. Adiposity was estimated for whole body, trunk, android, gynoid and visceral regions using DXA in addition to body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist to hip ratio (WHR). WHR [tertile 1 as reference, OR (95 % CI) for tertile 3: 3.62 (1.35–9.72)] and android to gynoid fat ratio [tertile 3: 2.87 (1.03–8.01)] were independent predictors of AAC severity among men. Positive associations with AAC severity were observed for WC [tertile 1 as reference, OR for tertile 3: 2.46 (1.12–5.41)], % trunk fat mass [tertile 2: 3.26 (1.52–7.03)], % android fat mass [tertile 2: 2.42 (1.13–5.18), tertile 3: 2.20 (1.02–4.73)] and visceral fat area [tertile 2: 2.28 (1.06–4.87), tertile 3: 2.32 (1.01–5.34)] among women. Indices of total body composition, BMI and % body fat mass were not associated with AAC severity in either men or women. Simple anthropometric measures, WHR and WC were the best predictors of AAC severity in men and women respectively, although higher android to gynoid fat ratio and central fat, assessed by DXA, were also predictive of higher risks of AAC severity in men and women respectively. Our findings add to existing evidence that relatively inexpensive and easily obtained anthropometric measures can be clinically useful indicators of atherosclerosis risk.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson PW, Kauppila LI, O’Donnell CJ, Kiel DP, Hannan M, Polak JM, Cupples LA (2001) Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality. Circulation 103:1529–1534
Yudkin JS, Eringa E, Stehouwer CD (2005) “Vasocrine” signalling from perivascular fat: a mechanism linking insulin resistance to vascular disease. Lancet 365:1817–1820
de Vos AM, Prokop M, Roos CJ, Meijs MF, van der Schouw YT, Rutten A, Gorter PM, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Rensing BJ, Bartelink ML, Velthuis BK, Mosterd A, Bots ML (2008) Peri-coronary epicardial adipose tissue is related to cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification in post-menopausal women. Eur Heart J 29:777–783
Cassidy AE, Bielak LF, Zhou Y, Sheedy PF 2nd, Turner ST, Breen JF, Araoz PA, Kullo IJ, Lin X, Peyser PA (2005) Progression of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: does obesity make a difference? Circulation 111:1877–1882
Canepa M, Ameri P, AlGhatrif M, Pestelli G, Milaneschi Y, Strait JB, Giallauria F, Ghigliotti G, Brunelli C, Lakatta EG, Ferrucci L (2014) Role of bone mineral density in the inverse relationship between body size and aortic calcification: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Atherosclerosis 235:169–175
Alexandersen P, Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Jespersen J, Skouby SO, Christiansen C (2006) Associations between aortic calcification and components of body composition in elderly men. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:1571–1578
Hughes-Austin JM, Wassel CL, Jimenez J, Criqui MH, Ix JH, Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Budoff MJ, Jenny NS, Allison MA (2014) The relationship between adiposity-associated inflammation and coronary artery and abdominal aortic calcium differs by strata of central adiposity: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Vascular 19:264–271
Liu J, Musani SK, Bidulescu A, Carr JJ, Wilson JG, Taylor HA, Fox CS (2012) Fatty liver, abdominal adipose tissue and atherosclerotic calcification in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. Atherosclerosis 224:521–525
Rossner S, Bo WJ, Hiltbrandt E, Hinson W, Karstaedt N, Santago P, Sobol WT, Crouse JR (1990) Adipose tissue determinations in cadavers—a comparison between cross-sectional planimetry and computed tomography. Int J Obes 14:893–902
Kaul S, Rothney MP, Peters DM, Wacker WK, Davis CE, Shapiro MD, Ergun DL (2012) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 20:1313–1318
Vega GL, Adams-Huet B, Peshock R, Willett D, Shah B, Grundy SM (2006) Influence of body fat content and distribution on variation in metabolic risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4459–4466
Ditomasso D, Carnethon MR, Wright CM, Allison MA (2010) The associations between visceral fat and calcified atherosclerosis are stronger in women than men. Atherosclerosis 208:531–536
Alvey NJ, Pedley A, Rosenquist KJ, Massaro JM, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Fox CS (2014) Association of fat density with subclinical atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc 3:e000788
Peterson MD, Al Snih S, Serra-Rexach JA, Burant C (2015) Android adiposity and lack of moderate and vigorous physical activity are associated with insulin resistance and diabetes in aging adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 70(8):1009–1117
Kang SM, Yoon JW, Ahn HY, Kim SY, Lee KH, Shin H, Choi SH, Park KS, Jang HC, Lim S (2011) Android fat depot is more closely associated with metabolic syndrome than abdominal visceral fat in elderly people. PLoS One 6:e27694
Giles GG, English DR (2002) The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. Int Agency Res Center Sci Publ 156:69–70
Shang X, Sanders KM, Scott D, Khan B, Hodge A, Khan N, English DR, Giles GG, Ebeling PR (2015) Dietary alpha-linolenic acid and total omega-3 fatty acids are inversely associated with abdominal aortic calcification in older women, but not in older men. J Nutr 145:1778–1786
Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL (2001) CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1126–1141
Lohman TJ, Roche AF, Martorell R (1992) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24(8):p952
Peppler WW, Mazess RB (1981) Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. I. Theory and measurement procedure. Calcif Tissue Int 33:353–359
Nicklas BJ, Penninx BW, Ryan AS, Berman DM, Lynch NA, Dennis KE (2003) Visceral adipose tissue cutoffs associated with metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in women. Diabetes Care 26:1413–1420
Bolland MJ, Wang TK, van Pelt NC, Horne AM, Mason BH, Ames RW, Grey AB, Ruygrok PN, Gamble GD, Reid IR (2010) Abdominal aortic calcification on vertebral morphometry images predicts incident myocardial infarction. J Bone Miner Res 25:505–512
Stone NJ (1996) Fish consumption, fish oil, lipids, and coronary heart disease. Circulation 94:2337–2340
Thompson D (2009) Ranking predictors in logistic regression. SAS User Group, Cleveland
Prentice AM, Jebb SA (2001) Beyond body mass index. Obes Rev 2:141–147
Connelly PW, Hanley AJ, Harris SB, Hegele RA, Zinman B (2003) Relation of waist circumference and glycemic status to C-reactive protein in the Sandy Lake Oji-Cree. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27:347–354
Walton C, Lees B, Crook D, Worthington M, Godsland IF, Stevenson JC (1995) Body fat distribution, rather than overall adiposity, influences serum lipids and lipoproteins in healthy men independently of age. Am J Med 99:459–464
Bose S, Krishnamoorthy P, Varanasi A, Nair J, Schutta M, Braunstein S, Iqbal N, Schwartz S, St Clair C, Master SR, Rader DJ, Reilly MP, Mehta NN (2013) Measurement of waist circumference predicts coronary atherosclerosis beyond plasma adipokines. Obesity (Silver Spring) 21:E118–E123
Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Kotler DP, Ross R (2002) Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcutaneous, and visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr 75:683–688
Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Alexandersen P, Larsen PJ, Christiansen C (2003) Central and peripheral fat mass have contrasting effect on the progression of aortic calcification in postmenopausal women. Eur Heart J 24:1531–1537
Kissebah AH, Krakower GR (1994) Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiol Rev 74:761–811
Wells JC (2007) Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 21:415–430
Grundy SM (2004) Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2595–2600
Tonstad S, Sandvik E, Larsen PG, Thelle D (2007) Gender differences in the prevalence and determinants of the metabolic syndrome in screened subjects at risk for coronary heart disease. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 5:174–182
Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364:937–952
Casanueva FF, Moreno B, Rodriguez-Azeredo R, Massien C, Conthe P, Formiguera X, Barrios V, Balkau B (2010) Relationship of abdominal obesity with cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hyperlipidaemia in Spain. Clin Endocrinol 73:35–40
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Department of Medicine, Western Hospital and the University of Melbourne Research Grant Scheme and a Heart Foundation Grant. The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study is funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria and further supported by Australian NHMRC Grants 209057, 251553 and 504711 and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. We thank the other investigators, staff, and participants of the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study cohort for their important contributions.
Author contribution
Dallas R English, Graham G Giles, and Peter R Ebeling conceived and designed the research. **anwen Shang, Kerrie M Sanders, David Scott, and Allison Hodge conducted data analysis, interpretation, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Belal Khan and Nayab Khan carried out experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shang, X., Scott, D., Hodge, A. et al. Adiposity assessed by anthropometric measures has a similar or greater predictive ability than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures for abdominal aortic calcification in community-dwelling older adults. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32, 1451–1460 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0920-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0920-2