Abstract
Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) exchange between terrestrial surfaces and the atmosphere plays an important role in the global Hg cycle, but there are large uncertainties in estimating the quantity of grassland air–soil exchange of elemental mercury vapor (Hg0). Our study investigated GEM exchange fluxes over the soil covered by two vegetation communities (including four conditions: L. chinensis coverage and removal, L. chinensis + forbs coverage and removal). We collected flux data during the growing season (from May to September) in 2018, highlighting the interactive effects of plant coverage and meteorological conditions. For the four different treatments, the daily mean values of GEM in the air ranged from 12.5 ± 3.7 to 17.4 ± 5.7 ng m−3 and the total Hg concentrations in the soil ranged as 32.8–36.2 ng g−1. GEM fluxes under the four treatments were net emissions from soil (daily mean 4.1 ± 8.4–9.0 ± 14.7) (ng m−2 h−1), varying diurnally with releasing (10.3 ± 6.3–20.0 ± 8.1) (ng m−2 h−1) in daytime, and depositing (4.3 ± 1.7–8.7 ± 4.6) (ng m−2 h−1) in nighttime. The significant difference of flux between vegetation coverage and removal were observed during the -growing season, but the differences between L. chinensis and L. chinensis + forbs coverage only were confirmed in July (p < 0.05). The positive correlation between fluxes and solar radiation, air/soil temperature suggested these meteorological factors could promote the Hg emission (p < 0.05). Together, we demonstrated that meadow steppe served as a source for atmospheric Hg during the growing season and the plant community played an importantly catabatic role in the Hg exchange between soil and atmosphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.
References
Agnan Y, Le Dantec T, Moore CW, Edwards GC, Obrist D (2016) New constraints on terrestrial surface atmosphere fluxes of gaseous element mercury using a global database. Environ Sci Technol 50:507–524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04013
Artaxo P, Calixto de Campos R, Fernandes ET, Martins JV, **ao Z, Lindqvist O, Fernández-Jiménez MT, Maenhaut W (2000) Large-scale mercury and trace element measurements in the Amazon basin. Atmos Environ 34:4085–4096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00106-0
Árvaya J, Demkováb L, Hauptvogl M et al (2017) Assessment of environmental and health risks in former polymetallic ore mining and smelting area, Slovakia: spatial distribution and accumulation of mercury in four different ecosystems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 144:236–244
Bengtsson J, Bullock JM, Egoh B, Everson C, Everson T, O’Connor T, O’Farrell PJ, Smith HG, Lindborg R (2019) Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere 10:e02582. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2582
Bergamaschi BA, Krabbenhoft DP, Aiken GR, Patino E, Rumbold DG, Orem WH (2012) Tidally driven export of dissolved organic carbon, total mercury, and methyl-mercury from a mangrove-dominated estuary. Environ Sci Technol 46:1371–1378. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2029137
Breiman L (2001) Random forest. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Carpi A, Lindberg SE (1997) Sunlight-mediated emission of elemental mercury from soil amended with municipal sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 31:2085–2091. https://doi.org/10.1021/es960910+
Carpi A, Frei A, Cocris D, McCloskey R, Contreras E, Ferguson K (2007) Analytical artifacts produced by a polycarbonate chamber compared to a Teflon chamber for measuring surface mercury fluxes. Chemosphere 388:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-006-1111-0
Carpi A, Fostier AH, Orta OR, dos Santos JC, Gittings M (2014) Gaseous mercury emissions from soil following forest loss and land use changes: field experiment on the United States and Brazil. Atmos Environ 96:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.004
Chai X, Ziyang L, Shimaoka T, Nakayama H, Ying Z, **aoyan C, Komiya T, Ishizaki T, Youcai Z (2010) Characteristics of environmental factors and and their effects on CH4 and CO2 emissions from a closed landfill: an ecological case study of Shanghai. Waste Manag 30:446–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.047
Choi H-D, Holsen TM (2009) Gaseous mercury fluxes from the forest floor of Adirondacks. Environ Pollut 157:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.020
Ci Z, Peng F, Xue X, Zhang X (2016) Air–surface exchange of gaseous mercury over permafrost soil: an investigation at a high-altitude (4700 m a.s.l.) and remote site in the central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Atmos Chem Phys 16:14741–14754. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14741-2016
Cizdziel JV, Jiang Y, Nallamothu D, Brewer JS, Gao Z (2019) Air/surface exchange of gaseous elemental mercury at different landscapes in Mississippi, USA. Atmosphere 10:538–552
Converse AD, Riscassi AL, Scanlon TM (2010) Seasonal variability in gaseous mercury fluxes measured in a high-elevation meadow. Atmos Environ 44:2176–2185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.024
Driscoll CT, Mason RP, Chan HM, Jacob DJ, Pirrone N (2013) Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects. Environ Sci Technol 47:4967–4983. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305071v
Eckley CS, Gustin M, Lin CJ, Li X, Miller MB (2010) The influence of dynamic chamber design and operating parameters on calculated surface-to-air mercury fluxes. Atmos Environ 44:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.10.013
Eckley CS, Blanchard P, McLennan D, Mintz R, Sekela M (2015) Soil-air mercury flux near a large industrial emission source before and after closure. Environ Sci Technol 49:392–399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01995
Edwards GC, Howard DA (2013) Air surface exchange measurements of gaseous elemental mercury over naturally enriched and background terrestrial landscapes in Australia. Atmos Chem Phys 13:5325–5336. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5325-2013
Ericksen JA, Gustin MS (2004) Foliar exchange of mercury as a function of soil and air mercury concentrations. Sci Total Environ 324:271–279
Ericksen JA, Gustin MS, Schorran DE, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE, Coleman JS (2003) Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage. Atmos Environ 37:1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00008-6
Fu X, **nbin F, Shaofeng W, Guangle QIU, ** LI (2007) Mercury flux rate of two types of grasslands in Guiyang. Res Environ Sci 20:33–37 (In Chinese)
Fu XW, Zhang H, Yu B (2015) Observations of atmospheric mercury in China: a critical review. Atmos Chem Phys 15:9455–9476. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9455-2015
Gillis AA, Miller DR (2000) Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and absorption at a soil surface. Sci Total Environ 260:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00563-5
Gustin MS, Stamenkovic J (2005) Effect of watering and soil moisture on mercury emissions from soils. Biogeochemistry 76:215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-005-4566-8
Gustin MS, Taylor GE, Maxey RA (1997) Effects of temperature and air movement on the flux of elemental mercury from substrate to the atmosphere. J Geochem Res 102:3891–3898. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd02742
Gustin MS, Ericksen JA, Schorran DE, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE, Coleman JS (2004) Application of controlled mesocosms for understanding mercury air/soil-plant exchange. Environ Sci Technol 38:6044–6050. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0487933
Gustin MS, Lindberg SE, Weisberg PJ (2008) An update on the natural sources and sinks of atmospheric mercury. Appl Geochem 23:482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.010
Harding G, Dalziel J, Vass P (2018) Bioaccumulation of methylmercury within the marine food web of the outer Bay of Fundy, Gulf of Maine. PLoS ONE 13:e09772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197220
Hartman JS, Weisberg PJ, Pillai R, Ericksen JA, Kuiken T, Lindberg SE, Zhang H, Rytuba JJ, Gustin MS (2009) Application of a rule-based model to estimate mercury exchange for three background biomes in the continental United States. Enviro Sci Technol 43:4989–4994. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900075q
Howard D, Edwards GC (2018) Mercury fluxes over an Australian alpine grassland and observation of nocturnal atmospheric mercury depletion events. Atmos Chem Phys 18:129–142. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-129-2018
Jiskra M, Wiederhold JG, Skyllberg U, Kronberg R-M, Hajdas I, Kretzschmar R (2015) Mercury deposition and re-emission pathways in boreal forest soils investigated with Hg isotope signatures. Environ Sci Technol 49:7188–7196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00742
Kang H, Liu X, Guo J, Xu G, Wu G, Zeng X, Wang B, Kang S (2018) Increased mercury pollution revealed by tree rings from the China’s Tianshan Mountains. Sci Bull 63:1328–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.09.010
Kikuchi T, Ikemoto H, Takahashi K, Hasome H, Ueda H (2013) Parameterizing soil emission and atmospheric oxidation reduction in a model of the global biogeochemical cycle of mercury. Environ Sci Technol 47:12266–12274. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401105h
Kim KH, Lindberg SE (1995) Design and initial tests of a dynamic enclosure chamber for measurements of vapor-phase mercury fluxes over soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01189766
Kim M-K, Zoh K-D (2012) Fate and transport of mercury in environmental media and human exposure. J Prev Med Public Health 45:335–343. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.335
Krabbenhoft DP, Sunderland EM (2013) Global change and mercury. Science 341:1457–1458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1242838
Li ZG, Feng X, Li P, Liang L, Tang SL, Wang SF, Fu XW, Qiu GL, Shang LH (2010) Emissions of air-borne mercury from five municipal solid waste landfill in Guiyang and Wuhan China. Atmos Chem Phys 10:3353–3364. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3353-2010
Lin C-J, Gustin MS, Singhasuk P, Eckley C, Miller M (2010) Empirical models for estimating mercury flux from soils. Environ Sci Technol 44:8522–8528. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1021735
Lin C-J, Zhu W, Li X, Feng X, Sommar J, Shang L (2012) Novel dynamic flux chamber for measuring air-surface exchange of Hg0 from soils. Environ Sci Technol 46:8910–8920. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3012386
Lindberg SE, Jackson D, Huckabee J, Janzen S, Levin M, Lund J (1979) Atmospheric emission and plant uptake of mercury from agricultural soils near the Almaden mercury mine. J Environ Qual 8:572–578. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800040026x
Lindberg SE, Kim KH, Meyers TP et al (1995) Micrometeorological gradient approach for quantifying air/surface exchange of mercury vapor: tests over contaminated soils. Enviro Sci Technol 29:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00001a016
Liu F, Cheng H, Yang K, Zhao C, Liu Y, Peng M, Li K (2014) Characteristics and influencing factors of mercury exchange flux between soil and air in Guangzhou City. J Geochem Explor 139:115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.09.005
Liu Y, Wu B, Hao Y, Zhu W, Li Z, Chai X (2017) Site-specific diel mercury emission fluxes in landfill: combined effects of vegetation and meteorological factors. Waste Manag 50:547–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.006
Ma M, Sun T, Du H, Wang D (2018) A two-year study on mercury fluxes from the soil under different vegetation cover in a Subtropical Region, South China. Atmosphere 9:30–39
Mao H, Talbot RW, Sigler JM, Sive BC, Hegarty JD (2008) Seasonal and diurnal variations of Hg degrees over New England. Atom Chem Phys 8:1403–1421. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1403-2008
Marsik FJ, Gerald KJ (2005) Air-Surface exchange of gaseous mercury over a mixed Sawgrass-Cattail stand within the Florida Everglades. Environ Sci Technol 39:4739–4746
Mazur M, Mitchell CPJ, Eckley CS, Eggert SL, Kolka RK, Sebestyen SD, Swain EB (2014) Gaseous mercury fluxes from forest soils in response to forest harvesting intensity: a field manipulation experiment. Sci Total Environ 496:678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.058
Miller MB, Gustin MS (2013) Testing and modeling the influence of reclamation and control methods for reducing nonpoint mercury emissions associated with industrial open pit gold mines. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 63:681–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.778221
Miller MB, Gustin MS (2015) Gas-exchange chamber analysis of elemental mercury deposition/emission to alluvium, ore, and mine tailings. Chemosphere 113:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.014
Miller MB, Gustin MS, Eckley CS (2011) Measurement and scaling of air-surface mercury exchange from substrates in the vicinty of two Nevada gold mines. Sci Total Environ 409:3879–3886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.040
Mu C, Schuster PF, Abbott BW, Kang S, Guo J, Sun S, Wu Q, Zhang T (2020) Permafrost degradation enhances the risk of mercury release on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Sci Total Environ 708:135127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135127
Obrist D, Johnson DW, Lindberg SE (2009) Mercury concentrations and pools in four Sierra Nevada forest sites, and relationships to organic carbon and nitrogen. Biogeosciences 6:765–777. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-765-2009
Rea AW, Lindberg SE, Scherbatskoy T, Keeler GJ (2002) Mercury accumulation in foliage over time in two northern mixed-hardwood forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 133:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012919731598
Rutter AP, Schauer JJ, Shafer MM, Creswell J, Olson MR, Clary A, Robinson M, Parman AM, Katzman TL (2011) Climate sensitivity of gaseous elemental mercury dry deposition to plants: impact of temperature, light intensity, and plant species. Enviro Sci Technol 45:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102687b
Schroeder WH, Munthe J, Lindqvist O (1989) Cycling of mercury between water, air and soil compartments of the environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 48:337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00283335
Simone FD, Gencarelli CN, Hedgecock IM, Pirrone N (2014) Global atmospheric cycle of mercury: a model study on the impact of oxidation mechanisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4110–4123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2451-x
Sommar J, Zhu W, Shang L, Lin CJ, Feng X (2016) Seasonal variations in metallic mercury (Hg0) vapor exchange over biannual wheat–corn rotation cropland in the North China Plain. Biogeosciences 13:2029–2049. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-2029-2016
Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS (2009) Nonstomatal versus stomatal uptake of atmospheric mercury. Enviro Sci Technol 43:1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801583a
Stamenkovic J, Gustin MS, Arnone JA, Johnson DW, Larsen JD, Verburg PSJ (2008) Atmospheric mercury exchange with a tallgrass prairie ecosystem housed in mesocosms. Sci Total Environ 406:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.047
Streets DG, Horowitz HM, Jacob DJ, Lu Z, Levin L, ter Schure AFH, Sunderland EM (2017) Total mercury released to the environment by human activities. Enviro Sci Technol 51:5969–5977. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00451
Sun S, Ma M, He X, Obrist D, Zhang Q, Yin X, Sun T, Huang J, Guo J, Kang S, Qin D (2020) Vegetation mediated mercury Flux and atmospheric mercury in the alpine permafrost region of the central Tibetan Plateau. Enviro Sci Technol 54:6043–6052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06636
Tao Z, Liu Y, Zhou M, Chai X (2017) Exchange pattern of gaseous elemental mercury in landfill: mercury deposition under vegetation coverage and interactive effects of multiple meteorological conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:26586–26593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0275-9
Wang D, He L, Shi X, Wei S, Feng X (2006) Release flux of mercury from different environmental surfaces in Chongqing, China. Chemosphere 64:1845–1854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.054
Wang X, Lin C-J, Yuan W, Sommar J, Zhu W, Feng XB (2016) Emission-dominated gas exchange of elemental mercury vapor over natural surfaces in China. Atmos Chem Phys 16:11125–11143
Wang L, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Wang D, Isbell F, Liu J, Feng C, Liu J, Zhong Z, Zhu H, Yuan X, Chang Q, Liu C (2019) Diversifying livestock promotes multidiversity and multifunctionality in managed grasslands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:6187–6192. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807354116
**n M, Gustin M, Johnson D (2007) Laboratory investigation of the potential for re-emission of atmospherically derived Hg from soils. Environ Sci Technol 41:4946–4951. https://doi.org/10.1021/es062783f
Zhang H, Lindberg SE, Barnett MO, Vette AF, Gustin MS (2002) Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model. Atmos Environ 36:835–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00501-5
Zhu W, Li Z, Chai X, Hao Y, Lin C-J, Sommar J, Feng X (2013) Emission characteristics and air-surface exchange of gaseous mercury at the largest active landfill in Asia. Atmos Environ 79:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.083
Zhu W, Lin CJ, Wang X, Sommar J, Fu X, Feng X (2016) Global observation and modeling of atmosphere-surface exchange of elemental mercury: a critical review. Atmos Chem Phys 16:4451–4480. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4451-2016
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31230012, 31770520); and Key Social Development Project of Jilin Science and Technology Department of China (Grant No. 20190303068SF). We are also grateful to the Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology of the Ministry of Education for its help and support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor :Justin B. Richardson.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, Z., **ao, T., Xu, Q. et al. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) exchange flux from soil-vegetation to atmosphere at a meadow steppe. Biogeochemistry 162, 267–284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-01004-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-01004-9