Correction: Biogerontology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-024-10101-1


In this article, under the sub heading “Diets of Drosophila melanogaster” the sentence stated “The energy density of the CON, HSHF, and HSHF + TFA diets were measured at 523.25 kcal/L, 2193.65 kcal/L, and 2193.65 kcal/L, respectively.” should have read, “The energy density of the CON (standard), HSHF HSHF, and HSHF + TFA diets were measured at 523.25 kcal/L, 2193.65 kcal/L, and 2193.65 kcal/L, respectively.”

Under the sub heading “Longevity assay”, the sentence stated, “The 3-day-old male flies were divided randomly assigned to three groups, each containing 200 flies distributed among four vials.” should have read, “The 3-day-old male flies were randomly assigned to three groups, each containing 200 flies distributed among four vials.” and the sentence stated, “It is important to note that the longevity assay only shows one of three, with the other two serving as verification.” should have read, “It is important to note that the longevity assay only shows one of three replicates, with the other two serving as verification.”

Under the sub heading “Climbing assay”, the sentence stated, “It is important to note that the climbing assay shows only one of the three, and the other two are used for verification.” should have read, “It is important to note that the climbing assay shows only one of the three replicates, and the other two are used for verification.”

The sentence in the sub heading “Smurf assay”, stated, “It is important to note that the Smurf assay shows only one of the three, and the other two are used for verification.” should have read, “It is important to note that the Smurf assay shows only one of the three replicates, and the other two are used for verification.”

The original article has been corrected.