Log in

An Individualized Approach to Skin Conductance Assessment during Execution of Tasks of Different Complexities

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Researchers use different approaches to analyze changes in skin conductance. At the same time, individual differences observed in both the initial values of skin conductance and response to stimuli do not allow comparing the responses of different subjects to the same impact. An individualized approach to the assessment of psycho-emotional stress has been developed using the real-time skin conductance index during continuous performance of a task with different levels of complexity. The participants, 18 second-year students at the actors’ high school, performed a simple task (expressive reading aloud of a simple text) and a difficult task (expressive reading aloud of the text inverted 180°). During the task, the skin conductance in the participants was continuously recorded. We revealed a change in the parameters of skin conductivity depending on the complexity of the task, both in comparison with resting state (baseline) and with simple and complex stages of the study. However, the individual skin conduction curves in the subjects differed greatly. A method for assessing the individual differences in parameters of skin conductance was proposed based on ranking by categories of values during continuous performance of tasks with different levels of complexity. This method allows comparing the levels of cognitive load in participants with different initial levels of skin conductance due to transition from the absolute to relative values at time intervals that are important for the researcher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tao D, Tan H, Wang H, Zhang X, Qu X, Zhang T. A systematic review of physiological measures of mental workload. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(15):2716. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Christopoulos GI, Uy MA, Yap WJ. The Body and the brain: Measuring skin conductance responses to understand the emotional experience. Organizational Res. Methods. 2019;22(1):394-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116681073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ. Neural activity relating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductance responses: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2000;20(8):3033-3040. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-03033.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim AY, Jang EH, Choi KW, Jeon HJ, Byun S, Sim JY, Choi JH, Yu HY. Skin conductance responses in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) under mental arithmetic stress. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0213140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hinrichs R, Michopoulos V, Winters S, Rothbaum AO, Rothbaum BO, Ressler KJ, Jovanovic T. Mobile assessment of heightened skin conductance in posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2017;34(6):502-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Najström M, Jansson B. Skin conductance responses as predictor of emotional responses to stressful life events. Behav. Res. Ther. 2007;45(10):2456-2463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding Y, Cao Y, Duffy VG, Wang Y, Zhang X. Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning. Ergonomics. 2020;63(7):896-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2020.1759699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson GF. An analysis of mental workload in pilots during flight using multiple psychophysiological measures. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 2002;12(1):3-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Longo L, Wickens CD, Hancock G, Hancock PA. Human mental workload: a survey and a novel inclusive definition. Front. Psychol. 2022;13:883321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883321

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bari DS, Aldosky HYY, Tronstad C, Kalvøy H, Martinsen ØG. Electrodermal responses to discrete stimuli measured by skin conductance, skin potential, and skin susceptance. Skin Res. Technol. 2018;24(1):108-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. A. Kriklenko.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 176, No. 9, pp. 286-291, September, 2023

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kriklenko, E.A., Kovaleva, A.V. & Likhomanova, E.N. An Individualized Approach to Skin Conductance Assessment during Execution of Tasks of Different Complexities. Bull Exp Biol Med 176, 310–314 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-024-06014-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-024-06014-1

Keywords

Navigation