Log in

Investigation of the correlation between morphology and luminosity for two classes of main galaxies

  • Published:
Astrophysics Aims and scope

Using an apparent-magnitude limited Main galaxy sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7(SDSS DR7), we investigate the correlation between morphologies and luminosity for the Main galaxy sample. Our Main galaxy sample is divided into two classes: Main galaxies only with TARGET_GALAXY flag (bestPrimtarget = 64), and ones also with other flags. It is found that for the second class Main galaxies, the early-type proportion monotonously increases with increasing luminosity nearly in the whole luminosity region. But for the first class Main galaxies, the early-type proportion increases with increasing luminosity only within a certain luminosity region (−22.2 < M r  < −19.8). In the high luminosity region (M r  < −22.2), the early-type proportion of the first class Main galaxies even decreases dramatically with increasing luminosity. We also analyze the correlation between morphologies and luminosity of galaxies around the peak of the redshift distribution ( 0.07 ≤ z ≤ 0.08 ). In such a narrow redshift region, we still observe strong correlation between morphologies and luminosity, which shows that this correlation is fundamental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Holmberg, Meddelanden fran Lunds Astronomiska Observatorium Serie II, 136, 1, 1958.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. S. Roberts and M. P. Haynes, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 32, 115, 1994.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. I. Strateva, Z. Ivezic, G. R. Knapp et al., Astron. J., 122, 1861, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. A. Baum, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif., 71, 106, 1959.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. de Vaucouleurs, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 5, 233, 1961.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Faber, Astrophys. J., 179, 731, 1973.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Visvanathan and A. Sandage, Astrophys. J., 216, 214, 1977.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Sandage and N. Visvanathan, Astrophys. J., 223, 707, 1978.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. G. Bower, J. R. Lucey, and R. S. Ellis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 254, 601, 1992.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Aragon-Salamanca, R. S. Ellis, W. J. Couch, and D. Carter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 262, 764, 1993.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. A. Stanford, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, and M. Dickinson, Astrophys. J., 450, 512, 1995.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Stanford, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, and M. Dickinson, Astrophys. J., 492, 461, 1998.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. S. Ellis, I. Smail, A. Dressler et al., Astrophys. J., 483, 582, 1997.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. R. Blanton et al., Astrophys. J., 121, 2358, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Terlevich, N. Caldwell, R. G. Bower, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 326, 1547, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. E. F. Bell, C. Wolf, K. Meisenheimer et al., Astrophys. J., 608, 752, 2004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. B. P. Holden, S. A. Stanford, P. Eisenhardt, and M. Dickinson, Astron. J., 127, 2484, 2004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. D. W. Hogg, M. R. Blanton, J. Brinchmann et al., Astrophys. J., 601, L29, 2004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. J. Cool, D. J. Eisenstein, D. Johnston et al., Astron. J., 131, 736, 2006.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. X. Chang, A. Gallazzi, G. Kauffmann et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 366, 717, 2006.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. R. Blanton, D. W. Hogg, N. A. Bahcall et al., Astrophys. J., 594, 186, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. I. K. Baldry, K. Glazebrook, J. Brinkmann et al., Astrophys. J., 600, 681, 2004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Balogh, I. K. Baldry, R. Nichol et al., Astrophys. J., 615, L101, 2004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Kelm, P. Focardi, and G. Sorrentino, Astron. Astrophys., 442, 117, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. A. Strauss, D. H. Weinberg, R. H. Lupton et al., Astron. J., 124, 1810, 2002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D. J. Eisenstein, J. Annis, J. E. Gunn et al., Astron. J., 122, 2267, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. X. F. Deng, J. Z. He, P. Jiang et al., Ap, 50, 273, 2007.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. K. Adelman-McCarthy, M. A. Agüeros, S. S.Allam et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 172, 634, 2007.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. X. F. Deng, J. Z. He, C. H. Luo et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B, 39, 965, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. N. Abazajian, J. K. Adelman-McCarthy, M. A. Agüeros et al., Astrophys. J. S, 182, 543, 2009.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Stoughton, R. H. Lupton, M. Bernardi et al., Astron. J., 123, 485, 2002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. C. Park, Y. Y. Choi, M. S. Vogeley et al., Astrophys. J., 633, 11, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. R. Blanton, D. J. Schlegel, M. A. Strauss et al., Astron. J., 129, 2562, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Shimasaku, M. Fukugita, M. Doi et al., Astron. J., 122, 1238, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. O.Nakamura, M.Fukugita, N.Yasuda et al., Astron. J., 125, 1682, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. R. G. Abraham, S. van den Bergh, and P. A. Nair, Astrophys. J., 588, 218, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Park, Y. Y. Choi, Astrophys. J., 635, L29, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Yamauchi, S. I. Ichikawa, M. Doi et al., Astron. J., 130, 1545, 2005.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. G. Sorrentino, V. Antonuccio-Delogu, and A. Rifatto, Astron. Astrophys., 460, 673, 2006.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. X. F. Deng, J. Z. He, P. Jiang et al., Astroparticle Physics, 30, 113, 2008.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. X. F. Deng, J. Z. He, and X. Q. Wen, Astrophys. J., 693, L71, 2009.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Davis and M. J. Geller, Astrophys. J., 208, 13, 1976.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. J. Loveday, S. J. Maddox, G. Efstathiou, and B. A. Peterson, Astrophys. J., 442, 457, 1995.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. P. Norberg, C. M. Baugh, E. Hawkins et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 332, 827, 2002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Norberg, C. M. Baugh, E. Hawkins et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 328, 64, 2001.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. I. Zehavi, M. R. Blanton, J. A. Frieman et al., Astrophys. J., 571, 172, 2002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. X. F. Deng, J. Z. He, P. Jiang et al., Astron. Astrophys., 474, 783, 2007.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **n-Fa Deng.

Additional information

Published in Astrofizika, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 55–63 (February 2012).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, XF., Qian, XX., Luo, CH. et al. Investigation of the correlation between morphology and luminosity for two classes of main galaxies. Astrophysics 55, 45–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10511-012-9213-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10511-012-9213-1

Keywords

Navigation