Abstract
Although virginity is not a medical term and is instead socially constructed, it remains unknown what medical providers believe about the biological basis of virginity. This study explored providers’ and medical students’ beliefs about virginity and the potential impact of such beliefs on healthcare. This was a concurrent mixed-method survey study of 124 medical students and 216 healthcare providers (Registered Nurse, Physician Assistant, Nurse Practitioner, and Doctor of Medicine) at Penn State Health and The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. Participants rated their level of agreement with common misconceptions about virginity on a six-point Likert scale. Open-ended questions gave respondents the opportunity to define virginity and to describe terms like virgin and virginal in the context of sexual experience and the medical lexicon. We identified common themes in the qualitative data using thematic analysis. Frequencies of misconceptions and statistically significant demographic associations were identified in the quantitative data. Definitions of virginity were varied and vague, most with negative connotations. A majority of respondents said that virginity has no biological basis. Many participants identified downsides to use of terms like virgin, virginity, and virginal in medicine. The most prevalent misconceptions about virginity were related to the hymen. Seventeen percent of students and 26% of providers at least somewhat agreed that it was possible to determine whether a person has engaged in vaginal intercourse through a gynecological exam. Misconceptions about virginity persist in medicine and bias, even if unintended, may impact the quality-of-care people with vaginas receive. Language around sexual health should be specific, inclusive, clinically relevant, and free from judgment. Medical education must continue to work to eliminate the concept of a biological basis to virginity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J. A., Botash, A. S., & Kellogg, N. (2004). Differences in hymenal morphology between adolescent girls with and without a history of consensual sexual intercourse. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158(3), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.3.280
Bauman, D. (2012). Diagnostic methods in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. Endocrine Development, 22, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326633
Bersamin, M. M., Fisher, D. A., Walker, S., Hill, D. L. B., & Grube, J. W. (2007). Defining virginity and abstinence: Adolescents’ interpretations of sexual behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.011
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Braverman, P. K., Breech, L., Blythe, M. J., Breuner, C. C., Levine, D. A., Murray, P. J., O’Brien, R. F., & Seigel, W. M. (2010). Gynecologic examination for adolescents in the pediatric office setting. Pediatrics, 126(3), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1542/PEDS.2010-1564
Brown, V. W., Lamb, S. M., Perkins, A. M., Naim, D. W., & Starling, S. P. (2014). Knowledge regarding hymens and the sex education of parents. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(6), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2014.928399
Bunik, M., Hay, W. W., Levin, M. J., & Abzug, M. J. (2022). Current diagnosis & treatment: Pediatrics (26th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 127–139.
Christianson, M., & Eriksson, C. (2013). Myths and misconceptions: Midwives’ perception of the vaginal opening or hymen and virginity. British Journal of Midwifery, 21(2), 108–115.
Clarke, A. E., Mamo, L., Fishman, J. R., Shim, J. K., & Fosket, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 161–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519765
Crosby, S. S., Oleng, N., Volpellier, M. M., & Mishori, R. (2020). Virginity testing: Recommendations for primary care physicians in Europe and North America. BMJ Global Health, 5(1), 2057. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002057
Dion, L., & Boislard, M.-A. (2022). What “counts” as first sex between women? Results from a study of first sex among women who have sex with women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 31, 253–267. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJHS.2022-0015
Egbe, T. O., Kobenge, F. M., & Wankie, E. M. (2019). Virginity-sparing management of hematocolpos with imperforate hymen: Case report and literature review. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X19846765
Emans, S. J., Woods, E. R., Allred, E. N., & Grace, E. (1994). Hymenal findings in adolescent women: Impact of tampon use and consensual sexual activity. Journal of Pediatrics, 125(1), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(94)70144-X
Faulkner, S. L. (2003). Good girl or flirt girl: Latinas’ definitions of sex and sexual relationships. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(2), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303025002003
Hegazy, A., & Al-Rukban, M. (2012). Hymen: Facts and conceptions. The Health, 3(4), 109–115.
Hobday, A. J., Haury, L., & Dayton, P. K. (1997). Function of the human hymen. Medical Hypotheses, 49, 171–173.
Horowitz, A. D., & Bedford, E. (2017). Graded structure in sexual definitions: Categorizations of having “had sex” and virginity loss among homosexual and heterosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1653–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0905-1
Huang, H. Y., Huang, Y. T., Wu, K. Y., Su, Y. Y., Hsuan Weng, C., & Wang, C. J. (2019). Office hysteroscopy as a valid tool for diagnosis of genital tract lesions in females with intact hymen. BioMed Research International, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4074975
Independent Forensic Expert Group. (2015). Statement on virginity testing. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 33, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFLM.2015.02.012.
Khambati, N. (2014). India’s two finger test after rape violates women and should be eliminated from medical practice. British Medical Journal, 348. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3336
Lee, K. H., Hong, J. S., Jung, H. J., Jeong, H. K., Moon, S. J., Park, W. H., Jeong, Y. M., Song, S. W., Suk, Y., Son, M. J., Lim, J. J., & Shin, J. I. (2019). Imperforate hymen: A comprehensive systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCM8010056
Lloyd, J., Crouch, N. S., Minto, C. L., Liao, L. M., & Creighton, S. M. (2005). Female genital appearance: ‘Normality’ unfolds. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112(5), 643–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1471-0528.2004.00517.X
Loveless, M., & Myint, O. (2018). Vulvovaginitis- presentation of more common problems in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 48, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BPOBGYN.2017.08.014
Ludwin, A., Ludwin, I., Bhagavath, B., Martins, W. P., & Lindheim, S. R. (2018). Virginity-sparing management of blind hemivagina in obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly syndrome. Fertility and Sterility, 110(5), 976–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2018.07.007
Magnusson, K.A. (2009). Vaginal corona. https://www.rfsu.se/globalassets/pdf/vaginal-corona-english.pdf.
Martin, E. (2001). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Beacon Press.
Maul, A. (2007). An evolutionary interpretation of the significance of physical pain experienced by human females: Defloration and childbirth pains. Medical Hypotheses, 69, 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2007.01.005
McAninch, J. W., & Lue, T. F. (2012). Smith & Tanagho’s general urology (18th ed.). McGraw-Hill Medical.
Mishori, R., Ferdowsian, H., Naimer, K., Volpellier, M., & McHale, T. (2019). The little tissue that couldn’t—dispelling myths about the hymen’s role in determining sexual history and assault. Reproductive Health, 16(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0731-8
Moaddab, A., McCullough, L. B., Chervenak, F. A., Stark, L., Schulkin, J., Dildy, G. A., Raine, S. P., & Shamshirsaz, A. A. (2017). A survey of honor-related practices among US obstetricians and gynecologists. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 139(2), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJGO.12294
Olson, R. M. K., & García-Moreno, C. (2017). Virginity testing: A systematic review. Reproductive Health, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12978-017-0319-0/TABLES/3
Our Bodies Ourselves Anatomy & Menstruation Contributors. (2014). Renaming the hymen: Vaginal corona. Our Bodies Ourselves. https://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/book-excerpts/health-article/renaming-the-hymen-vaginal-corona/.
Rogers, D. J., & Stark, M. (1998). The hymen is not necessarily torn after sexual intercourse. British Medical Journal, 317(7155), 414. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.317.7155.414
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2002). Gynaecological examinations: Guidelines for specialist practice. www.rcog.org.uk.
Sanders, S. A., Hill, B. J., Yarber, W. L., Graham, C. A., Crosby, R. A., & Milhausen, R. R. (2010). Misclassification bias: Diversity in conceptualisations about having had sex. Sexual Health, 7(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH09068
Sjoberg, D. D., Whiting, K., Curry, M., Lavery, J. A., & Larmarange, J. (2021). Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary package. The R Journal, 13(1), 570–580.
Solazzo, A. L., Tabaac, A. R., Agénor, M., Austin, S. B., & Charlton, B. M. (2019). Sexual orientation inequalities during provider-patient interactions in provider encouragement of sexual and reproductive health care. Preventive Medicine, 126, 105787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105787
Suneja, M., Szot, J. F., LeBlond, R. F., & Brown, D. D. (2020). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications Inc.
Trotter, E. C., & Alderson, K. G. (2007). University students’ definitions of having sex, sexual partner, and virginity loss: The influence of participant gender, sexual experience, and contextual factors. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16(1), 11–29.
Walser, S. A. (2020). The virginal speculum and its myths. Family Medicine, 52(9), 672–673.
Whitley, N. (1978). The first coital experience of one hundred women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 7(4), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1552-6909.1978.TB00924.X
World Health Organization. (2018). Eliminating virginity testing—An interagency statement. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-18.15.
Acknowledgements
This research was generously supported by the Judy Chicago Art Education Award. The project was also supported by the Penn State Health and College of Medicine Qualitative and Mixed Methods Core, part of the Penn State Clinical Translational and Science Institute. The authors would also like to thank Mack Ruffin, MD, Chair of the Department of Community and Family Medicine at Penn State Health, for his support in executing this study.
Funding
NA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
The study protocol was submitted to and reviewed by the Human Subjects Protection Office at Penn State College of Medicine and determined to not require a formal Institutional Review Board review because the research met the criteria for exempt research according to the policies of the institution and the provision of applicable federal regulations.
Informed Consent
Online informed consent was obtained from all individuals who participated in this study.
Participation of Human Subjects/Consent
The study was deemed exempt by the Institutional Review Board.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Survey
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Walser, S.A., Costigan, H., Stuckey, H.L. et al. The Opaque Language of Sexuality: Medical Students’ and Providers’ Beliefs About Virginity. Arch Sex Behav 52, 2619–2638 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02578-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02578-7