Log in

Divisibility problems for function fields

  • Published:
Acta Mathematica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 January 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

We investigate three combinatorial problems considered by Erdős, Rivat, Sárközy and Schön regarding divisibility properties of sum sets and sets of shifted products of integers in the context of function fields. Our results in this function field setting are better than those previously obtained for subsets of the integers. These improvements depend on a version of the large sieve for sparse sets of moduli developed recently by the first and third-named authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 27 January 2020

    In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.

  • 27 January 2020

    In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.

  • 27 January 2020

    In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.

  • 27 January 2020

    In [3], we derived three results in additive combinatorics for function fields. The proofs of these results depended on a recent bound for the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli for function fields by the first and third-named authors in [1]. Unfortunately, they discovered an error in this paper and demonstrated in [2] that this result cannot hold in full generality. In the present paper, we formulate a plausible conjecture under which the said three results in [3] remain true and the method of proof goes through using the same arguments. However, these results are now only conditional and still await a full proof.

References

  1. S. Baier, A note on P-sets, Integers, 4 (2004), A13, 6 pp.

  2. Baier S.: On the large sieve with sparse sets of moduli. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc., 21, 279–295 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Baier and R. K. Singh, Large sieve inequality with power moduli for function fields, ar**v:1802.03131 [math.NT] (2018).

  4. Baier S., ZhaoL L.: Large sieve inequality with characters for powerful moduli. Int. J. Number Theory, 1, 265–279 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bombieri, Le grand crible dans la thorie analytique des nombres, 2nd ed., Astérisque, 18, Société Mathématique de France (Paris, 1987).

  6. Elsholtz C., Planitzer S.: On Erdős and Sárközy’s sequences with Property P. Monatsh. Math., 182, 565–575 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdős P., Sárközy A.: On divisibility properties of integers of the form aa. Acta Math. Hungar., 50, 117–122 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu C.-N.: A large sieve inequality for rational function fields. J. Number Theory, 58, 267–287 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. L. Montgomery, Topics in Multiplicative Number Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 227, Springer-Verlag (Berlin–New York, 1971).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Rivat and A. Sárközy, On arithmetic properties of products and shifted products, in: Analytic Number Theory, Springer (Cham, 2015), pp. 345–355.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoen T.: On a problem of Erdős and Sárközy. J. Comb. Theory Ser. A, 94, 191–195 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao L.: Large sieve inequality with characters to square moduli. Acta Arith., 112, 297–308 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Igor Shparlinski for making us aware of Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 and suggesting to consider them in the function field setting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Baier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baier, S., Bansal, A. & Singh, R.K. Divisibility problems for function fields. Acta Math. Hungar. 156, 435–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-018-0853-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-018-0853-4

Key words and phrases

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation