Log in

Perspectives from Young Partnered Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men on the Adaptation of Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (YGBMSM) are a priority population for HIV prevention efforts. Although there has been a growing focus on dyadic HIV prevention interventions for same-gender male couples, the unique needs of partnered YGBMSM have been largely overlooked. In this qualitative study, we explored partnered YGBMSM’s perceptions of existing HIV prevention interventions to inform the design of a relationship-focused HIV prevention intervention. Between July and November 2018, we conducted in-depth interviews with 30 young partnered YGBMSM (mean age = 17.8, SD = 1.1). Participants described that interventions were needed to address skills regarding: (1) implicit versus explicit communication about sexual agreements; (2) boundary setting and identifying signs of abusive relationships; and (3) relationship dynamics (e.g., trust). Participants noted the absence of inclusive sexual education for them; thus, findings suggest that the provision of relationship skills training are requisites for HIV prevention interventions with YGBMSM in the US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HIV and Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/sexualbehaviors/pdf/hiv_factsheet_ymsm.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2020.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gay and bisexual men's health-HIV/AIDS 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/HIV.htm.

  3. Kann L. Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-related behaviors among students in grades 9–12—United States and selected sites, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016;65:1–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell ST, Clarke TJ, Clary J. Are teens “post-gay”? Contemporary adolescents’ sexual identity labels. J Youth Adoles. 2009;38(7):884–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bauermeister JA, Ventuneac A, **el E, Parsons JT. Spectrums of love: examining the relationship between romantic motivations and sexual risk among young gay and bisexual men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1549–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schulenberg J, Maggs JL, Hurrelmann K. Negotiating developmental transitions during adolescence and young adulthood: health risks and opportunities. Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sullivan PS, Salazar L, Buchbinder S, Sanchez TH. Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities. AIDS. 2009;23(9):1153–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodreau SM, Carnegie NB, Vittinghoff E, Lama JR, Sanchez J, Grinsztejn B, et al. What drives the US and Peruvian HIV epidemics in men who have sex with men (MSM)? PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e50522.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brady S, Iantaffi A, Galos D, Rosser BRS. Open, closed, or in between: relationship configuration and condom use among men who use the internet to seek sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(4):1499–514.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. ** F, Crawford J, Prestage GP, Zablotska I, Imrie J, Kippax SC, et al. Unprotected anal intercourse, risk reduction behaviours, and subsequent HIV infection in a cohort of homosexual men. AIDS. 2009;23(2):243–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldenberg T, Finneran C, Andes KL, Stephenson R. ‘Sometimes people let love conquer them’: how love, intimacy, and trust in relationships between men who have sex with men influence perceptions of sexual risk and sexual decision-making. Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(5):607–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephenson R, White D, Mitchell JW. Sexual agreements and perception of HIV prevalence among an online sample of partnered men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1813–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell JW, Petroll AE. Patterns of HIV and STI testing among MSM couples in the US. Sex Trans Dis. 2012;39(11):871.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Malebranche DJ, Fields EL, Bryant LO, Harper SR. Masculine socialization and sexual risk behaviors among Black men who have sex with men: a qualitative exploration. Men Masculinities. 2009;12(1):90–112.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Newcomb ME, Ryan DT, Garofalo R, Mustanski B. The effects of sexual partnership and relationship characteristics on three sexual risk variables in young men who have sex with men. Arc Sex Behav. 2014;43(1):61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Starks TJ, Payton G, Golub SA, Weinberger CL, Parsons JT. Contextualizing condom use: intimacy interference, stigma, and unprotected sex. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(6):711–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhodes T, Cusick L. Love and intimacy in relationship risk management: HIV positive people and their sexual partners. Sociol Health Illn. 2000;22(1):1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frost DM, Stirratt MJ, Ouellette SC. Understanding why gay men seek HIV-seroconcordant partners: intimacy and risk reduction motivations. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10(5):513–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoff CC, Campbell CK, Chakravarty D, Darbes LA. Relationship-based predictors of sexual risk for HIV among MSM couples: a systematic review of the literature. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(12):2873–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adam BD, Sears A, Schellenberg E. Accounting for unsafe sex: interviews with men who have sex with men. J Sex Res. 2000;37:24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jadack RA, Fresia A, Rompalo AM, Zenilman J. Reasons for not using condoms of clients at urban sexually transmitted diseases clinics. Sex Trans Dis. 1997;24(7):402–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoff CC, Chakravarty D, Beougher SC, Darbes LA, Dadasovich R, Neilands TB. Serostatus differences and agreements about sex with outside partners among gay male couples. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(1):25–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell JW, Harvey SM, Champeau D, Seal DW. Relationship factors associated with HIV risk among a sample of gay male couples. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(2):404–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gamarel KE, Golub SA. Closeness discrepancies and intimacy interference: motivations for HIV prevention behavior in primary romantic relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019;45(2):270–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parsons JT, Starks TJ, Gamarel KE, Grov C. Non-monogamy and sexual relationship quality among same-sex male couples. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(5):669.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomez AM, Beougher SC, Chakravarty D, Neilands TB, Mandic CG, Darbes LA, et al. Relationship dynamics as predictors of broken agreements about outside sexual partners: implications for HIV prevention among gay couples. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(6):1584–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Myrick R. AIDS, communication, and empowerment: gay male identity and the politics of public health messages. Milton Park: Routledge; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mustanski B, Greene GJ, Ryan D, Whitton SW. Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an online sexual health promotion program for LGBT youth: the Queer Sex Ed intervention. J Sex Res. 2015;52(2):220–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Newcomb ME, Macapagal KR, Feinstein BA, Bettin E, Swann G, Whitton SW. Integrating HIV prevention and relationship education for young same-sex male couples: a pilot trial of the 2GETHER intervention. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(8):2464–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu E, El-Bassel N, McVinney LD, et al. Feasibility and promise of a couples-based HIV/STI prevention intervention for methamphetamine-using, Black men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2011;15:1745.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez O, Wu E, Levine EC, et al. Intergration of social, cultural, and biomedical strategies into an existing couples-based HIV/STI prevention intervention: voices of Latino male couples. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0152361.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez O, Wu E, Frasca T, et al. Adaptation of a couples-based HIV/STI prevention for Latino men who have sex with men in New York City. Am J Men Health. 2015;11(2):181–95.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Burton J, Darbes LA, Operario D. Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):1–10.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Crepaz N, Tungol-Ashmon MV, Vosburgh HW, Baack BN, Mullins MM. Are couple-based interventions more effective than interventions delivered to individuals in promoting HIV protective behaviors? A meta-analysis. AIDS Care. 2015;27(11):1361–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. LaCroix JM, Pellowski JA, Lennon CA, Johnson BT. Behavioural interventions to reduce sexual risk for HIV in heterosexual couples: a meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(8):620–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Starks TJ, Ewing SWF, Lovejoy T, Gurung S, Cain D, Fan CA, et al. Adolescent male couples-based HIV testing intervention (We Test): protocol for a type 1, hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial. JMIR Res Prot. 2019;8(6):e11186.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stephenson R, Freeland R, Sullivan SP, Riley E, Johnson BA, Mitchell JW, et al. Home-based HIV testing and counseling for male couples (Project Nexus): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Prot. 2017;6(5):e101.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bazzi AR, Fergus KB, Stephenson R, Finneran CA, Coffey-Esquivel J, Hidalgo MA, et al. A dyadic behavioral intervention to optimize same sex male couples’ engagement across the HIV care continuum: development of and protocol for an innovative couples-based approach (partner steps). JMIR Res Prot. 2016;5(3):e168.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gamarel KE, Darbes LA, Hightow-Weidman L, Sullivan P, Stephenson R. The development and testing of a relationship skills intervention to improve HIV prevention uptake among young gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and their primary partners (we prevent): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Prot. 2019;8(1):e10370.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig K, Rosenberg E, Sanchez T, LeGrand S, Gravens L, et al. University of North Carolina/Emory Center for Innovative Technology (iTech) for addressing the HIV epidemic among adolescents and young adults in the United States: protocol and rationale for center development. JMIR Res Prot. 2018;7(8):e10365.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Goldenberg T, Finneran C, Andes KL, Stephenson R. Using participant-empowered visual relationship timelines in a qualitative study of sexual behaviour. Global Public Health. 2016;11(5–6):699–718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gamarel KE, Stephenson R, Hightow-Weidman L. Technology-driven methodologies to collective qualitative data among youth to inform HIV prevention and care interventions. mHealth. 2020.

  43. Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Desgrees-du-Lou A, Orne-Gliemann J. Couple-centred testing and counselling for HIV serodiscordant heterosexual couples in sub-Saharan Africa. Repro Health Matters. 2008;16(32):151–61.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Darbes LA, McGrath NB, Hosegood V, Johnson MO, Fritz K, Ngubane T, et al. Results of a couples-based randomized controlled trial aimed to increase testing for HIV. J Acq Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80(4):404–13.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rendina HJ, Breslow AS, Grov C, Ventuneac A, Starks TJ, Parsons JT. Interest in couples-based voluntary HIV counseling and testing in a national US sample of gay and bisexual men: the role of demographic and HIV risk factors. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(1):149–59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Stephenson R, Finneran C, Goldenberg T, Coury-Doniger P, Senn TE, Urban M, et al. Willingness to use couples HIV testing and discussion of sexual agreements among heterosexuals. Springerplus. 2015;4(1):169.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Neme S, Goldenberg T, Stekler JD, Sullivan PS, Stephenson R. Attitudes towards couples HIV testing and counseling among Latino men who have sex with men in the Seattle area. AIDS Care. 2015;27(10):1354–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mitchell JW. Gay male couples’ attitudes toward using couples-based voluntary HIV counseling and testing. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(1):161–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Reisner SL, Menino D, Leung K, Gamarel KE. Unspoken agreements: perceived acceptability of couples HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) among cisgender men with transgender women partners. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(2):366–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stephenson R, Finneran C. The IPV-GBM Scale: a new scale to measure intimate partner violence among gay and bisexual men. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e62592.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Pantalone DW, Schneider KL, Valentine SE, Simoni JM. Investigating partner abuse among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):1031–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Houston E, McKirnan DJ. Intimate partner abuse among gay and bisexual men: risk correlates and health outcomes. J Urban Health. 2007;84(5):681–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Buller AM, Devries KM, Howard LM, et al. Associations between intimate partner violence and health among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;11:e1001609.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stults CB, Javdani S, Greenbaum C, Kapadia F, Halkitis PN. Intimate partner violence among young men who have sex with men. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(2):215–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Tetan AL, Ball B, Valle LA, Noonan R, Rosenbluf B. Considerations for the defintion, measurement, consequences, and prevention of dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. J Women's Health. 2009;18:7923–7.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sarnquist C, Omondi B, Sinclair J, et al. Rape prevention through empowerment of adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 2014;13(5):e1226–e12321232.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Newcomb ME, Sarno EL, Bettin E, et al. Relationship education and HIV prevention for young male couples administered online via videoconference: protocol for a national randomized controlled trial of 2gether. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(1):e15883.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the young men who participated in this study; and staff members: Matthew Rosso, Catherine Washington, Kristina Felder-Claude, and Ramona Rai for their contributions to this study. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Sonia Lee for her support of this project. This study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (U19HD89881).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristi E. Gamarel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gamarel, K.E., Darbes, L.A., Kutsa, O. et al. Perspectives from Young Partnered Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men on the Adaptation of Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC). AIDS Behav 25, 836–846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-03037-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-03037-3

Keywords

Navigation