Log in

Modeling and In Vitro Experimental Validation for Kinetics of the Colonoscope in Colonoscopy

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the most sensitive and specific means for detection of colon cancers and polyps. To make colonoscopy more effective several problems must be overcome including: pain associated with the procedure, the risk of perforation, and incomplete intubation colonoscopy. Technically, these problems are the result of loop formation during colonoscopy. Although, several solutions such as modifying the stiffness of the colonoscope, using an overtube and develo** image-guided instruments have been introduced to resolve the loo** problem, the results of these systems are not completely satisfactory. A new paradigm to overcome loop formation is proposed that is doctor-assistive colonoscopy. In this approach, the endoscopists performance is enhanced by providing using a kinetic model that provides information such as the shape of the scope, direction of the colon and forces exerted within certain sections. It is expected that with the help of this model, the endoscopist would be able to adjust the manipulation to avoid loop formation. In the present studies, the kinetic model is developed and validated using an ex vivo colonoscopy test-bed with a comprehensive kinematic and kinetic data collection. The model utilizes an established colon model based on animal tissue with position tracking sensors, contact force sensors for the intraluminal portion of the scope and a Colonoscopy Force Monitor for the external insertion tube.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CFM:

Colonoscopy Force Monitor

FEM:

Finite Element Method

LCP:

Linear Complementarity Problem

ELF:

Economical Load and Force

ATC:

Ascension Technologies Corp

DOF:

Degree of Freedom

RMSE:

Root mean square error

CV:

Coefficient of variation

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

References

  1. Altenbach, J., H. Altenbach, and V. A. Eremeyev. On generalized Cosserat-type theories of plates and shells: a short review and bibliography. Arch. Appl. Mech. 80:73–92, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, J., D. Shepherd, and J. J. Zhang. Cosserat-beam-based dynamic response modelling. Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds 18(4–5):429–436, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, W. B., M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Development of autonomous microrobotics in endoscopy. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 35:391–401, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, W. B., M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Overview of upcoming advances in colonoscopy. Dig. Endosc. 24:1–6, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, W. B., M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Analysis of and mathematical model insight into loop formation in colonoscopy. J. Eng. Med. 226:858–867, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, W. B., M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Predication for relative motion of the colonoscope in colonoscopy. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 13:1–14, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, W. B., K. Y. Song, W. L. Luo, Z. Q. Qian, M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Kinematical model and experimental validation for the colonoscope. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2012. doi:10.5405/jmbe.1331.

  8. Cheng, W. B., M. Moser, S. Kanagaratnam, and W. J. Zhang. Influence of physical property of colonoscope on loo** during colonoscopy. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 2012 doi:10.5405/jmbe.1139.

  9. Dario, P., P. Ciarletta, A. Menciassi, and B. Kim. Modeling and experimental validation of the locomotion of endoscopic robots in the colon. Int. J. Robot. Res. 23:5540–5545, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dequidt, J., C. Duriez, S. Cotin, and E. Kerrien. Towards interactive planning of coil embolization in brain aneurysms. MICCAI 12:377–385, 2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Duriez, C., C. Guebert, M. Marchal, S. Cotin, and L. Grisoni. Interactive simulation of flexible needle insertions based on constraint models. MICCAI 12:291–299, 2009.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duriez, C., and A. Kheddar. Realistic haptic rendering of interacting deformable objects in virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 12:1–12, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fung, Y. C. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues (2nd ed.). New York: Springer, pp. 278–279, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gilardi, G., and I. Sharf. Literature survey of contact dynamics modeling. Mech. Mach. Theory 37:1213–1239, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hellier, D., F. Albermni, B. Evans, H. D. Visser, C. Adam, and J. Passeger. Flexural and torsional rigidity of colonoscopes at room and body temperatures. J. Eng. Med. 225:389–399, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hellier, D. Determination of colonoscope’s structure properties for interactive simulation of colonoscopy. Master Thesis, The University of Queensland, 2010.

  17. Hong, M., S. Jung, M. Choi, and S. W. Welch. Fast volume preservation for a mass-spring system. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 26(5):83–91, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ikuta, K. Virtual endoscope system with force sensation. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Autom. 4:1715–1721, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ikuta, K. Portable Virtual Endoscope System with Force and Visual Display for Insertion Training. MICCAI 1935:907–920, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Konings, M. K., E. B. van de Kraats, T. Alderliesten, and W. J. Niessen. Analytical guide wire motion algorithm for simulation of endovascular interventions. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 41(6):689–700, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenoir, J., S. Cotin, C. Duriez, and P. Neumnm. Physics-based models for catheter, guidewire and stent simulation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 119:305–310, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Louis, Y., L. Y. Korman, V. Egorov, S. Tsuryupa, B. Corbin, M. Anderson, N. Sarvazyan, and A. Sarvazyan. Characterization of forces applied by endoscopists during colonoscopy by using a wireless colonoscopy force monitor. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71(2):327–334, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, K., and K. Chinzei. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. J. Biomech. 30:1115–1121, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rem’ion, Y., J. M. Nourrit, and D. Gillard. Dynamic animation of spline like objects. J. Visual Comp. Animat. 11(1):17–26, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shinya, M. Theories for mass-spring simulation in computer graphics: stability, costs and improvements. Ieice Trans. Inf. Syst. 88(4):767–774, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spillmann, J., and M. Teschner. CORDE: cosserat rod elements for the dynamic simulation of one-dimensional elastic objects. Eurographics/ACM Siggraph Symposium on Computer Animation 2007, pp. 1–10.

  27. Theetten, A., L. Grisoni, C. Andriot, and B. Barsky. Geometrically exact dynamic splines. Comput. Aided Des. 40:35–48, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Valentini, P. P., and E. Pennesti. Modeling elastic beams using dynamic splines. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25:271–284, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, X., M. Downes, T. Goktekin, and F. Tendick. Adaptive nonlinear finite elements for deformable body simulation using dynamic progressive meshes. Comput. Graph. Forum 20:349–358, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zupan, D., and M. Saje. The three-dimensional beam theory: finite element formulation based on curvature. Comput. Struct. 81:1875–1888, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author wishes to acknowledge financial support received from China Scholarship Council for this research, and give special thanks to Dr. Christina Duriez for his technical support for this research. This research is partially supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation through an international collaborative research funding (Research Funding No.: 12410709900). The authors acknowledge Artann Laboratories for providing CFM device for this research. Development of the CFM was supported by the Grant R44DK068936 from the National Institute Of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Jun Zhang.

Additional information

Associate Editor Cheng Dong oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, WB., Di, YY., Zhang, E.M. et al. Modeling and In Vitro Experimental Validation for Kinetics of the Colonoscope in Colonoscopy. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 1084–1093 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0746-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0746-1

Keywords

Navigation