Log in

Four-year experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects at a single referral center in Japan with focus on inaccurately diagnosed cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect at the referral level in our institution.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-two cases were referred for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defect (CHD). Cases having CHDs were divided into isolated and complex CHDs, and the prenatal and postnatal diagnoses were compared.

Results

Thirty-nine cases were diagnosed with CHDs. The remaining 93 cases were diagnosed as normal. Postnatal diagnosis confirmed that 39 cases had CHDs; there were 19 cases of isolated CHD and 20 cases of complex CHD. Among the 19 cases of isolated CHD, all four cases with a false negative diagnosis had ventricular septal defects of an outlet or muscular type with a small defect. Cases with a false positive diagnosis had coarctation of the aorta (3 cases) or total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (1 case). Among the 20 cases of complex CHD, the prenatal diagnoses in two cases were not the same as the postnatal diagnosis and the prognosis was worse than expected. In one case with a single ventricle, pulmonary stenosis, and pulmonary venous atresia, the prenatal diagnosis was hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a suboptimal study at 38 weeks’ gestation. In the other case, the diagnosis of corrected transposition of the great arteries had been missed because of misinterpretation of the anatomically right and left ventricles in utero.

Conclusions

There were three possible causes of misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of CHD: disease orientation, timing of diagnosis, and skill of the examiners. This information may be helpful for the improvement of diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gembruch U. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 1997;17:1283–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferencz C, Rubin JD, McCarter RJ, et al. Congenital heart disease: prevalence at livebirth. The Baltimore–Washington Infant Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:31–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman JI. Incidence of congenital heart disease: II. Prenatal incidence. Pediatr Cardiol. 1995;16:155–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young ID, Clarke M. Lethal malformations and perinatal mortality: a 10 year review with comparison of ethnic differences. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;295:89–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylostalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial. Lancet. 1990;336:387–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leivo T, Tuominen R, Saari-Kemppainen A, Ylostalo P, Karjalainen O, Heinonen OP. Cost-effectiveness of one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a report from the Helsinki ultrasound trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bakiler AR, Ozer EA, Kanik A, Kanit H, Aktas FN. Accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease with fetal echocardiography. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22:241–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Satomi G, Kawataki M, Nishibataka M, et al. The guideline for fetal echocardiography. Pediatr Cardiol Card Surg. 2006;22:591–613 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshikane Y, Yoshizato T, Maeno Y, et al. Impact and issues of detecting fetal congenital heart defects in Kyushu, Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:775–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chao R, Ho E, Hsieh K. Fluctuations of interventricular shunting in a fetus with an isolated ventricular septal defect. Am Heart J. 1994;127:955–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lethor JP, Marson F, de Moor M, King MEE. Physiology of ventricular septal defect shunt flow in the fetus examined by color Doppler M-mode. Circulation. 2000;101:e93–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Axt-Fliedner R, Schwarze A, Smrcek J, Germer U, Krapp M, Gembruch U. Isolated ventricular septal defects detected by color Doppler imaging: evolution during fetal and first year of postnatal life. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:266–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown KL, Ridout DA, Hoskote A, Verhulst L, Ricci M, Bull C. Delayed diagnosis of congenital heart disease worsens preoperative condition and outcome of surgery in neonates. Heart. 2006;92:1298–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K. Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F33–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hornberger LK, Weintraub RG, Pesonen E, et al. Echocardiographic study of the morphology and growth of the aortic arch in the human fetus. Observations related to the prenatal diagnosis of coarctation. Circulation. 1992;86:741–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nomiyama M, Ueda Y, Toyota Y, Kawano H. Fetal aortic isthmus growth and morphology in late gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:153–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharland GK, Chan KY, Allan LD. Coarctation of the aorta: difficulties in prenatal diagnosis. Br Heart J. 1994;71:70–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hornberger LK, Sahn DJ, Kleinman CS, Copel J, Silverman NH. Antenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:417–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung E, Won HS, Lee RP, Kim A, Park LS. Clinical implication of isolated right dominant heart in the fetus. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:695–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matsui H, Mellander M, Roughton M, Jicinska H, Gardiner HM. Morphological and physiological predictors of fetal aortic coarctation. Circulation. 2008;118:1793–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasquini L, Mellander M, Seale A, et al. Z-scores of the fetal aortic isthmus and duct: an aid to assessing arch hypoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:628–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest or competing financial interests related to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyuki Yoshizato.

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshikane, Y., Yoshizato, T., Otake, Y. et al. Four-year experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects at a single referral center in Japan with focus on inaccurately diagnosed cases. J Med Ultrasonics 39, 235–240 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0362-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-012-0362-y

Keywords

Navigation