Log in

What’s shaking for caterpillars? Leaf-borne vibratory stimuli and behavioral responses in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leaf-borne vibrations are predicted to be significant for caterpillar communication and risk assessment, but the caterpillar’s vibratory landscape remains largely unknown. To address this, we used the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, as a model in our study with two main goals: (1) to characterize the vibratory landscape on a leaf in the presence of abiotic (wind and rain) and biotic (conspecifics and invertebrate predator) stimuli; and (2) to assess whether different larval instars detect and respond to those vibrations. Our findings show that abiotic and biotic vibrations were distinct from background noise, except for those produced by 1st instar larvae. Wind-induced leaf movement produced vibrations with a low-frequency and high-amplitude (< 100 Hz and 2.97 mm s−1), in contrast with raindrops (> 174 Hz; 3.25 mm s−1). The 2nd to 5th instar larvae and predatory stinkbugs moving on leaves produced vibrations with dominant frequencies ranging from 140 to 326 Hz and amplitudes from 1.42 to 2.95 mm s−1. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of vibrations across bean leaves revealed that abiotic vibrations were more widely spread across leaves, unlike the more concentrated biotic vibrations. Regarding the caterpillar response to vibratory stimuli, caterpillars exposed to abiotic stimuli behaved differently from undisturbed caterpillars, regardless of instar. By contrast, caterpillars exposed to biotic stimuli do not respond consistently. Our findings contribute insights into a caterpillar’s vibroscape and support the hypothesis that armyworms can perceive and respond to both abiotic and biotic vibrations, filling a knowledge gap about this economically important pest species' sensory ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

LMT would like to thank CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education; Financial Code 001) for the PhD sandwich scholarship at Carleton University, Canada. Financial support provided by CAPES and the Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) to RNCG and LCJ, and by the Natural Science and Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant) to JEY, is also appreciated is acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by CAPES Foundation (Brazilian Ministry of Education; Financial Code 001) (Grant number: 88887.466568/2019–00) and the Brazilian National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Grant number: 163967/2020–2) and by the Natural Science and Research Council of Canada (Grant number: 2020–07056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Narciso C. Guedes.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were considered in the present investigation.

Informed consent

The authors of this manuscript accept that the paper is submitted for publication in the Journal of Pest Science, and report that this paper has not been published or accepted for publication in another journal, and it is not under consideration at another journal.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicolas Desneux .

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 633 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turchen, L.M., Cosme, L., Yack, J.E. et al. What’s shaking for caterpillars? Leaf-borne vibratory stimuli and behavioral responses in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. J Pest Sci 96, 1483–1496 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01496-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01496-2

Keywords

Navigation