Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Kennedy, K., Sarohia, G., Podbielski, D., Pickard, S., Tarride, J.E., **e, F.: Systematic methodological review of health state values in glaucoma cost-utility analyses. Eur. J. Health Econ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01663-x
Annemans, L., Genesté, B., Jolain, B.: Early modelling for assessing health and economic outcomes of drug therapy. Value Health. 3, 427–434 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4733.2000.36007.x
IJzerman, M.J., Koffijberg, H., Fenwick, E., Krahn, M.: Emerging use of early health technology assessment in medical product development: A sco** review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 35, 727–740 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0509-1
Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health care Programmes, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)
Neumann, P.J., Sanders, G.D., Russell, L.B., Siegel, J.E., Ganiats, T.G. (eds.): Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2016)
Lazzaro, C., van Steen, C., Billeit, S., Frauenknecht, H., Kallen, C., Pfennigsdorf, S., Thelen, U., Angelillo, L.: Cost-utility analysis of a latanoprost cationic emulsion (STN1013001) versus other latanoprost in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and concomitant ocular surface disease in Germany. Clin. Ophthalmol. 16, 323–337 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S351013
Lazzaro, C., van Steen, C., Aptel, F., Schweitzer, C., Angelillo, L.: Cost-utility analysis of STN1013001, a latanoprost cationic emulsion, versus other latanoprost formulations (latanoprost) in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and ocular surface disease in France. J. Ophthalmol. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3837471
Patel, V., Ahmed, I., Podbielski, D., Falvey, H., Murray, J., Goeree, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of standalone trabecular micro-bypass stents in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma in Canada. J. Med. Econ. 22(4), 390–401 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1572013
Ordóñez, J.E., Ordóñez, A., Osorio, U.M.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for patients with open-angle glaucoma in Colombia. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 35(2), 329–340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1506022
van Gestel, A., Webers, C.A., Severens, J.L., Beckers, H.J., Jansonius, N.M., Hendrikse, F., Schouten, J.S.: The long-term outcomes of four alternative treatment strategies for primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 90, 20–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02318.x
O’Hagan, A., Buck, C.E., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J.R., Garthwaite, P.H., Jenkinson, D.J., Oakley, J.E., Rakow, R.: Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities. Wiley, Chichester (2006)
McAteer, H., Cosh, E., Freeman, G., Pandit, A., Wood, P., Lilford, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis at the development phase of a potential health technology: Examples based on tissue engineering of bladder and urethra. J. Tissue Eng. Regen Med. 1, 343–349 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/term.36
Girling, A., Young, T., Brown, C., Lilford, R.: Early-stage valuation of medical devices: The role of developmental uncertainty. Value Health. 13, 585–591 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00726.x
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Carlo Lazzaro drafted this Letter to the Editor.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Carlo Lazzaro has no conflicts of interest/competing interests with this Letter to the Editor. Outside this Letter to the Editor, in the past three years Carlo Lazzaro has received teaching fees from University of Pavia, research grants, speaker or consultancy fees from argenx BV, AstraZeneca S.p.A, Ipsen S.p.A., Janssen-Cilag SPA, Horizon Therapeutics srl, Roche S.p.A., Roche Diagnostics S.p.A., Sanofi s.r.l., Santen GmbH.
Declaration of generative Artificial Intelligence in scientific writing
Carlo Lazzaro declares that no section of this Letter to the Editor was supported by Artificial Intelligence.
Ethical approval
This contribution was exempt from ethical review due to it being a Letter to the Editor.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazzaro, C. Letter to the Editor: Lazzaro responds to Kennedy et al.. Eur J Health Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01703-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01703-0