Log in

Antecedents of young consumers’ behavioral intention toward plastic waste minimization in Vietnam

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid economic growth, urbanization, and shifting lifestyles have triggered a global plastic pollution crisis, threatening the environment. Understanding consumer behavior is crucial for implementing a circular economy (CE) for plastics aimed at minimizing waste, as psychological factors can hinder technical solutions. This paper aims to pinpoint the determinants influencing young consumer intentions in plastic waste minimization (PWM). An extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Structural Equation Modeling were applied to explore antecedents of behavioral intention of 677 young consumers in Vietnam regarding PWM. The study reveals that attitude is the most significant positive factor influencing consumers' behavioral intention to lower plastic consumption, followed by perceived behavioral control and the effect of charges on plastic utensils. In contrast to the other TPB constructs, the subjective norm, which fails to meet the criteria for passing the hypothesis test, is determined to be an insignificant predictor of consumers' intention toward PWM. Furthermore, the study also confirms the significant correlations between consumer characteristics (gender, field of study, levels of education program, and the status of pedagogical training) and the attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, effect of charges on plastic utensils, and behavioral intention. This study thereby enriches the existing literature on PWM, offering insights that can assist governments and organizations in comprehending consumer intentions, contributing to the success of CE projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Sun Y, He H (2023) Understanding consumers’ purchase intentions of single-use plastic products. Fronti Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heidbreder LM, Tröger J, Schmitt M (2023) Exploring the psychological antecedents of private and public sphere behaviours to reduce household plastic consumption. Environ Dev Sustainability 25:3405–3428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang S, Wang H, Ahmad W et al (2022) Plastic waste management strategies and their environmental aspects: a scientometric analysis and comprehensive review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan D, Su F, Liu C et al (2020) Research progress for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 3:443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2022) Global Plastics Outlook.

  6. Statista (2023) Plastic waste worldwide - statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/5401/globalplastic-waste/#topicOverview. Accessed 11 Sep 2023

  7. The World Bank (WB) (2022) Vietnam: Plastic Pollution Diagnostics. In: East Asia and Pacific Region:MARINE PLASTICS SERIES

  8. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MONRE) (2020) National Environmental Status Report 2019. In: Ministry of the Natural Resources and the Environment, Hanoi: Ministry of the Natural Resources and the Environment

  9. IUCN-EA-QUANTIS (2020) National Guidance for plastic pollution hotspotting and sha** action, Country report Vietnam. In, Bangkok: International Union for the Conservation of Nature

  10. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C et al (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347:768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ashworth DC, Elliott P, Toledano MB (2014) Waste incineration and adverse birth and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int 69:120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang N, Zhang H, Chen M et al (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions from MSW incineration in China: impacts of waste characteristics and energy recovery. Waste Manage 32:2552–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franchini M, Rial M, Buiatti E et al (2004) Health effects of exposure to waste incinerator emissions: a review of epidemiological studies. Ann Ist Super Sanita 40:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teuten EL, Saquing JM, Knappe DR et al (2009) Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philosophical Trans Royal Society B: Biol Sci 364:2027–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sridharan S, Kumar M, Singh L et al (2021) Microplastics as an emerging source of particulate air pollution: a critical review. J Hazard Mater 418:126245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. United Nations (UN) (2015) What are the Sustainable Development Goals?. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals. Accessed Sept 2023

  17. Negrete-Cardoso M, Rosano-Ortega G, Álvarez-Aros EL et al (2022) Circular economy strategy and waste management: A bibliometric analysis in its contribution to sustainable development, toward a post-COVID-19 era. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:61729–61746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar R, Verma A, Shome A et al (2021) Impacts of plastic pollution on ecosystem services, sustainable development goals, and need to focus on circular economy and policy interventions. Sustainability 13:9963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saadeh D, Al-Khatib IA, Anayah FM (2022) Evaluating strategies for sustainable recovery and recycling of plastic waste in the West Bank of Palestine: the perspectives of plastic companies. Environ Monit Assess 195:233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gomes GM, Moreira N, Ometto AR (2022) Role of consumer mindsets, behavior, and influencing factors in circular consumption systems: a systematic review. Sustain Prod Consum 32:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moraga G, Huysveld S, Mathieux F et al (2019) Circular economy indicators: what do they measure? Resour Conserv Recycl 146:452–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. So WWM, Cheng INY, Cheung LTO et al (2021) Extending the theory of planned behavior to explore the plastic waste minimisation intention of Hong Kong citizens. Aust J Environ Educ 37:266–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. European Commission, Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency, Cerulli-Harms A, Porsch L, Suter J, Rodriguez Diaz A, Peroz T, Vermeulen J et al (2018) Behavioural study on consumers’ engagement in the circular economy: executive summary. {CEU}. https://doi.org/10.2818/921596

  24. Kirchherr J, Piscicelli L, Bour R et al (2018) Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecolog Econ 150:264–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chun T’ing L, Moorthy K, Yoon C et al (2020) Determinants of 3Rs behavior in plastic usage: a study among Malaysians. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De Fano D, Schena R, Russo A (2022) Empowering plastic recycling: empirical investigation on the influence of social media on consumer behavior. Resour Conserv Recycl 182:106269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Siddiqui SA, Profeta A, Decker T et al (2023) Influencing factors for Consumers and rsquo; intention to reduce plastic packaging in different groups of fast-moving consumer goods in Germany. Sustainability 15:7625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adjei M, Song H, Nketiah E et al (2022) Waste management: forecasting residents’ plastic waste recycling intention and behavior in Ghana. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04056-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hameed I, Khan K, Waris I et al (2022) Factors influencing the sustainable consumer behavior concerning the recycling of plastic waste. Environ Qual Manag 32:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rhein S, Schmid M (2020) Consumers’ awareness of plastic packaging: More than just environmental concerns. Resour Conserv Recycl 162:105063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen HV, Le MTT, Do LT (2022) Intrinsic motivation for reducing single-use plastics: the compensation effects of basic psychological needs. Resour Conserv Recycl 185:106482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Do H, Linh D, Thai C et al (2019) factors influencing consumers’ behavioral intentions to reduce plastic waste: empirical research with the case of Vietnam. South East Asia J Contemp Bus, Econ Law 18:174–181

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pham CH, Nguyen HV, Le MTT et al (2022) The synergistic impact of motivations on sustained pro-environmental consumer behaviors: an empirical evidence for single-use plastic products. Asia Pac J Mark Logist 34:287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aruta JJBR (2022) An extension of the theory of planned behavior in predicting intention to reduce plastic use in the Philippines: cross-sectional and experimental evidence. Asian J Social Psych 25:406–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan O, Daddi T, Slabbinck H et al (2020) Assessing the determinants of intentions and behaviors of organizations toward a circular economy for plastics. Resour Conserv Recycl 163:105069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V (2014) Time to retire the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol Rev 8:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Skinner BF (1953) Science and human behavior. Macmillan, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jakovcevic A, Steg L, Mazzeo N et al (2014) Charges for plastic bags: Motivational and behavioral effects. J Environ Psychol 40:372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Homonoff TA (2018) Can small incentives have large effects? The impact of taxes versus bonuses on disposable bag use. Am Econ J Econ Pol 10:177–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. United Nations (UN) (2022) YouthStats: Environment and Climate Change. In:Office of the SecretaryGeneral’s Envoy on Youth

  41. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwartz S (1970) Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. J Pers Soc Psychol 15:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Khan F, Ahmed W, Najmi A (2019) Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions toward dealing with the plastic waste: perspective of a develo** country. Resour Conserv Recycl 142:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Liao Y, Yang W (2022) The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behavior: an integrating framework. Environ Dev Sustain 24:8566–8592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Teo Kexin F, Binti Hubadillah SK (2023) Consumer behavior toward the reduction of single-use plastic among the residents in jelutong, penang. Emerging Adv Integr Technol 3:79–89

    Google Scholar 

  46. Van L, Abdul Hamid N, Ahmad M et al (2021) Factors of single use plastic reduction behavioral intention. Emerging Sci J 5:269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Senturk G, Dumludag D (2022) The relationship between consumption of single-use plastic bags, environmental awareness, and socio-demographic factors. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 24:1494–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ et al. (2019) Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Andover, Hampshire, United Kingdom, Andover, Hampshire, United Kingdom

  49. General Statistics Office (GSO) (2022) Press conference to announce the results of the household living standards survey 2021. https://www.gso.gov.vn/du-lieu-va-so-lieu-thong-ke/2022/06/thong-cao-bao-chi-ketqua-khao-sat-muc-song-dan-cu-2021. Accessed Aug 2023

  50. Herabadi AG, Bella ES, Adishesa S et al (2023) Keep your litter in the loop: predicting generation Z’s intention to recycle single-use plastic Waste. Psychol Res Urban Soc 6:7

    Google Scholar 

  51. Aikowe LD, Mazancová J (2021) Plastic waste sorting intentions among university students. Sustainability 13:7526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Circular Ga (2019) The Role of Gender in Waste Management: Gender Perspectives on Waste in India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  53. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J (2002) Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res 4:E13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Smith WG (2008) Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior, Online submission

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res 18:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Byrne BM (2016) Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Raithel S, Sarstedt M, Scharf S et al (2012) On the value relevance of customer satisfaction. Multiple drivers and multiple markets. J Acad Mark Sci 40:509–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM et al (2021) Evaluation of the Structural Model. In: Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S (eds) Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 115–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  59. Hasan SNMS, Harun R, Hock LK (2015) Application of theory of planned behavior in measuring the behavior to reduce plastic consumption among students at Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Procedia Environ Sci 30:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun Y, Wang S, Li J et al (2017) Understanding consumers’ intention to use plastic bags: using an extended theory of planned behavior model. Nat Hazards 89:1327–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Soomro YA, Hameed I, Bhutto MY et al (2022) What influences consumers to recycle solid Waste? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 14:998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zen IS, Ahamad R, Omar W (2013) No plastic bag campaign day in Malaysia and the policy implication. Environ Dev Sustainability 15:1259–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ohtomo S, Ohnuma S (2014) Psychological interventional approach for reduce resource consumption: reducing plastic bag usage at supermarkets. Resour Conserv Recycl 84:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Senturk G, Dumludag D (2021) An evaluation of the effect of plastic bag fee on consumer behavior: case of Turkey. Waste Manag 120:748–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ayob S, Sheau-Ting L (2016) Key determinants of waste separation intention among students on campus. MATEC Web of Conferences 66:00066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mohd Ali M, Nerina R (2018) Intention to practice reduce, reuse & recycle (3R) among expatriates working in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i3/3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Thomas GO, Sautkina E, Poortinga W et al (2019) The english plastic bag charge changed behavior and increased support for other charges to reduce plastic Waste. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Convery F, Mcdonnell S, Ferreira S (2007) The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ Resour Econ 38:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Poortinga W, Whitmarsh L, Suffolk C (2013) The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in wales: attitude change and behavioral spillover effects. J Environ Psychol 36:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. He H (2012) Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environ Devel Econ 17:407–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Martinho G, Balaia N, Pires A (2017) The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers’ behavior. Waste Manage 61:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wichai-Utcha N, Chavalparit O (2019) 3Rs Policy and plastic waste management in Thailand. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21:10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Omondi I, Asari M (2021) A study on consumer consciousness and behavior to the plastic bag ban in Kenya. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23:425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Hunter LM, Hatch A, Johnson A (2004) Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors*. Soc Sci Quart 85:677–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Vicente-Molina MA, Fernández-Sáinz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J (2013) Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behavior: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. J Clean Prod 61:130–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Kılıç S, Sahin C (2012) A study on teacher candidates’ recycling behaviors: a model approach with the theory of planned behavior. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Science: 29–36

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Thi Thu Nguyen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, H.T.T. Antecedents of young consumers’ behavioral intention toward plastic waste minimization in Vietnam. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02030-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02030-5

Keywords

Navigation