Abstract
Background
Endometrial carcinoma, the most common gynecologic carcinoma, has an excellent prognosis post-surgery when diagnosed early. The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in stages I–II endometrial carcinoma remains controversial. This study assesses the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in improving prognosis for these patients.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1223 stage I–II endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent surgical treatment including total hysterectomy, bilateral sal**o-oophorectomy, and lymph-node biopsy or dissection across four Jikei University School of Medicine-affiliated facilities between 2001 and 2018. Patients were divided into low intermediate risk (LIR) and high intermediate risk (HIR) groups based on recurrence risk. Propensity score matching adjusted for various covariates was used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not.
Results
The study included 443 eligible patients, with 288 in the LIR group and 155 in the HIR group. Post propensity score matching, no significant difference in PFS or OS was observed between the observation and adjuvant chemotherapy groups within both risk categories. Notably, the 5-year OS for LIR was 97.6% in the observation group and 96.7% in the chemotherapy group; for HIR, the 5-year OS was similarly high with no significant difference.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy does not significantly contribute to the improvement of recurrence or prognosis in patients with stage I–II endometrial carcinoma who are categorized outside the low-risk group and have no lymph-node metastasis.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10147-024-02560-w/MediaObjects/10147_2024_2560_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10147-024-02560-w/MediaObjects/10147_2024_2560_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10147-024-02560-w/MediaObjects/10147_2024_2560_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10147-024-02560-w/MediaObjects/10147_2024_2560_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21660
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS et al (2023) Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin 73:17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21763
Yoshino K, Kurita T, Takahashi F et al (2023) Annual report of the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Annual Patient Report for 2020 and Annual Treatment Report for 2015. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15767
May K, Bryant A, Dickinson HO et al (2010) Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007585.PUB2
Ignatov A, Ivros S, Bozukova M et al (2020) Systematic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 302:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00404-020-05600-8
Watanabe Y, Aoki D, Kitagawa R et al (2007) Status of surgical treatment procedures for endometrial cancer in Japan: Results of a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Survey. Gynecol Oncol 105:325–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2006.12.015
Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL et al (2022) Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 33:860–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009
Abu-Rustum N, Yashar C, Arend R et al (2023) Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 21:181–209. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.0006
Yamagami W, Mikami M, Nagase S et al (2020) Japan society of gynecologic oncology 2018 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasms. J Gynecol Oncol 31:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e18
Kong A, Johnson N, Kitchener HC et al (2012) Adjuvant radiotherapy for Stage I endometrial cancer : an updated cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. JNCI J Natl Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs374
Mariani A, Webb MJ, Keeney GL et al (2000) Low-risk corpus cancer: is lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy necessary? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1506–1519. https://doi.org/10.1067/MOB.2000.107335
Aoki Y, Watanabe M, Amikura T et al (2004) Adjuvant chemotherapy as treatment of high-risk stage I and II endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 94:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.040
Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H et al (2006) Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: A gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 24:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7617
Galaal K, Al Moundhri M, Bryant A et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010681.PUB2
Maggi R, Lissoni A, Spina F et al (2006) Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: Results of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 95:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603279
Susumu N, Sagae S, Udagawa Y et al (2008) Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 108:226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2007.09.029
Watanabe Y, Kitagawa R, Aoki D et al (2009) Practice pattern for postoperative management of endometrial cancer in Japan: A survey of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 115:456–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2009.08.016
Hogberg T, Signorelli M, De Oliveira CF et al (2010) Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer–results from two randomised studies. Eur J Cancer 46:2422–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2010.06.002
Pecorelli S (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:103–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGO.2009.02.012
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244
Sasada S, Yunokawa M, Takehara Y et al (2017) Baseline risk of recurrence in stage I–II endometrial carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3802/JGO.2018.29.E9
Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM et al (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27:5331–5336. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248
Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC et al (2017) Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with Stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2017.2068
Jørgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu CS et al (2019) Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 109:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2018.12.004
Borgfeldt C, Holmberg E, Marcickiewicz J et al (2021) Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery – a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study. BMC Cancer 21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08289-3
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the participating hospitals affiliated with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in The Jikei University School of Medicine and the gynecologic doctors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: J.S., M.T. Data curation: J.S., Y.K., M.K., K.T. Formal analysis: J.S., H.M. Methodology: M.T. Project administration: J.S., H.T. Supervision: A.O. Writing — original draft: J.S. Writing — review and edition: H.T., H.M., M.S., H.T., K.Y., A.O.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest, sources of financial support, corporate involvement, or patent holdings to disclose concerning this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Suzuki, J., Tanabe, H., Michimae, H. et al. Prognostic significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I–II endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent lymphadenectomy. Int J Clin Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02560-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02560-w