SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical analysis of surgical outcome of 89 patients having large cerebral arteriovenous malformations

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The article analyzes the clinical features, morphological characteristics, surgical subtleties and long-term outcome of surgery in 89 cases of ‘large’ sized AVMs.

Materials and methods

During the period 2004 to 2022, 89 cases of ‘large’ arteriovenous malformations were operated in the neurosurgery departments of the authors. Large AVMs were defined as those that were more than 4 cm on either lateral or antero-posterior view of digital subtraction angiogram. The factors that determined the extent of surgical difficulties included site and eloquence of the area, number of feeding vascular territories and draining veins, degree and rate of flow, presence of flow-related aneurysms, and the physical nature of the arteriovenous malformation.

Results

There were 59 males and 30 females and the average age was 32 years. Headache, giddiness and convulsions were the common presenting complaints. Six patients were unconscious after surgery. Of these, five patients died in the immediate post-operative period and one patient gradually recovered. Additionally, seven patients developed unilateral limb weakness that included hemiplegia (4 patients) and hemiparesis (3 patients) following surgery. Clinical follow-up ranged from 6 months to 18 years (average 43 months). All surviving patients are leading normal and essentially symptom free life and have recovered from their symptoms of headache, convulsions and giddiness.

Conclusions

Large AVMs are amenable to ‘curative’ surgery with ‘acceptable’ results. The surgery can be challenging and appropriate case selection that is based on the surgeons experience is vital and decisive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AVM:

Arteriovenous malformation

ACA:

Anterior cerebral artery

MCA:

Middle cerebral artery

PCA:

Posterior cerebral artery

SCA:

Superior cerebellar artery

AICA:

Anterior Inferior cerebellar artery

PICA:

Posterior Inferior cerebellar artery

References

  1. Goel A (2005) Arteriovenous malformations: current status of surgery. Neurol India 53:11–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luther E, Govindarajan V, McCarthy DJ et al (2022) Brain arteriovenous malformations: Status of Open surgery after a Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 33(4):443–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park MT, Essibayi MA, Srinivasan VM, Catapano JS, Graffeo CS, Lawton MT (2022) Surgical management outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations after preoperative embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 45(6):3499–3510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim MJ, Jung HH, Kim YB et al (2023) Comparison of Single-Session, Neoadjuvant, and Adjuvant Embolization Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformation. Neurosurgery 92(5):986–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang H, Tang X, Weng R et al (2022) Long-term outcome of a tailored embolization strategy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg 30:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumot C, Picart T, Eker O, Guyotat J, Berhouma M, Pelissou-Guyotat I (2022) Outcomes of Unruptured Low-Grade Brain Arteriovenous malformations using TOBAS (treatment of Brain Arteriovenous malformations Study) Criteria. World Neurosurg 167:e1050–e1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasegawa T, Kato T, Naito T et al (2022) Effect of embolization before stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a case-control study with propensity score matching. J Neurosurg 138(4):955–961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Niwa R, Ichi S, Nomura R, Sato K (2022) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for large arteriovenous malformations and arteriovenous malformations located in eloquent areas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 62(10):445–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannizzaro D, Scibilia A, Frio F et al (2022) IV and V grade arteriovenous malformations: a multicenter surgical experience. Use of multiple grading system to predict surgical risk. J Clin Neurosci 104:96–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Leacy R, Ansari SA, Schirmer CM et al (2022) SNIS Standards and Guidelines Committee, SNIS Board of Directors. Endovascular treatment in the multimodality management of brain arteriovenous malformations: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee. J Neurointerv Surg 14(11):1118–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abla AA, Rutledge WC, Seymour ZA et al (2015) A treatment paradigm for high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations: volume-staged radiosurgical downgrading followed by microsurgical resection. J Neurosurg 122(2):419–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah A, Patni N, Ramdasi R, Goel A (2017) Progression in the size of an arterio-venous malformation. Asian J Neurosurg 12(2):207–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdulrauf SI (2015) Awake craniotomies for aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, skull base tumors, high flow bypass and brainstem lesions. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 6(1):8–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabarrós A, Young WL, McDermott MW, Lawton MT (2011) Language and motor map** during resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: indications, feasibility, and utility. Neurosurgery 68(3):744–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goel A (1997) Bilateral parafalcine approach for arteriovenous malformations located in the interhemispheric fissure. In: Kobayashi S, Goel A, Hongo K (eds) edsNeurosurgery of Complex tumours and vascular lesions. Churchill Livingstone, New York, p 143

    Google Scholar 

  16. Luessenhop AJ (1984) Natural history of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luessenhop AJ, Rosa L (1984) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Indications for and results of surgery, and the role of intravascular techniques. J Neurosurg 60(1):14–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li N, Yan D, Li Z et al (2022) Long-term outcomes of Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V arteriovenous malformations: a single-center experience. Neurosurg Focus 53(1):E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winkler EA, Lu A, Morshed RA, Yue JK et al (2020) Bringing high-grade arteriovenous malformations under control: clinical outcomes following multimodality treatment in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 26(1):82–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eliava S, Gorozhanin V, Shekhtman O, Pilipenko Y, Kuchina O (2021) Surgical Treatment of Unruptured Brain AVMs: short- and long-term results. Acta Neurochir Suppl 132:87–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah A, Jankharia B, Goel A (2017) Three-dimensional model printing for surgery on arteriovenousmalformations. Neurol India 65(6):1350–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spetzler RF, Hargraves RW, McCormick PW et al (1992) Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 76:918–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magro E, Gentric JC, Batista AL et al (2018) The treatment of Brain AVMs Study (TOBAS): an all-inclusive framework to integrate clinical care and research. J Neurosurg 128(6):1823–1829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C et al (2014) Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unrupturedbrainarteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomisedtrial. Lancet 15(9917):383

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brown RD Jr, Wiebers DO, Forbes G et al (1988) The natural history of unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 68:352–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawton MT, Rutledge WC, Kim H et al (2015) Brain arteriovenous malformations. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimada K, Miyake K, Yamaguchi I et al (2023) Efficacy of utilizing both 3-Dimensional Multimodal Fusion Image and Intra-arterial Indocyanine Green Videoangiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation surgery. World Neurosurg 169:e260–e269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tao S, Zhang T, Zhou K et al (2022) Intraoperative monitoring cerebral blood Flow during the treatment of Brain Arteriovenous malformations in Hybrid operating room by laser speckle contrast imaging. Front Surg 9:855397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Spetzler RF, Martin NA (1986) A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65:476–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawton MT, Kim H, McCulloch CE, Mikhak B, Young WL (2010) A supplementary grading scale for selecting patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for surgery. Neurosurgery 66:702–713 discussion 713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tayebi Meybodi A, Lawton MT (2018) Modern classification and outcome predictors of surgery in patients with brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg Sci 62(4):454–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Drake CG (1979) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: considerations for and experience with surgical treatment in 166 cases. Clin Neurosurg 26:145–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rammos SK, Gardenghi B, Bortolotti C, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G (2016) Aneurysms Associated with Brain Arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(11):1966–1971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Perret G, Nishioka H (1966) Report on the cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Section VI. Arteriovenous malformations. An analysis of 545 cases of cranio-cerebral arteriovenous malformations and fistulae reported to the cooperative study. J Neurosurg 25:467–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang SD, Marcellus ML, Marks MP et al (2003) Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 53:1–11, discussion 11–13

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Bandra, Mumbai, India

    Atul Goel, Apurva Prasad, Kumar Abhinav & Ashutosh Shukla

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, India

    Atul Goel & Abhidha Shah

  3. Department of Neurosurgery, K.J. Somaiya Hospital and Research Center, Ayurvihar, Mumbai, India

    Atul Goel, Ravikiran Vutha & Abhidha Shah

  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Apollo Hospitals, Navi Mumbai, India

    Ravikiran Vutha & Abhidha Shah

Authors
  1. Atul Goel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravikiran Vutha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abhidha Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Apurva Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kumar Abhinav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ashutosh Shukla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.G.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original draft, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision, Project Administration. R.V.: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – Review and Editing. A.S: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – Original draft, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision. A.P: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – Review and Editing. K.A: Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review and Editing. A.S: Methodology, Validation, Writing – Review and Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul Goel.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This is a retrospective review hence ethics committee permission was not deemed necessary.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goel, A., Vutha, R., Shah, A. et al. Clinical analysis of surgical outcome of 89 patients having large cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg Rev 47, 224 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02447-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02447-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation