Log in

Assessing primary areas for a sustainable biochar application in soil by using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an innovative approach was carried out using the geographic information systems (GIS)-based multi-criteria evaluation model to assign the use priority in agricultural lands needing to be improved for management and sustainability of biochar application in the soil. The model included (1) site suitability assessments, (2) standardization of assessment factors, and (3) equal-weighted overlay. By this model, the first map of primary biochar application areas for Turkey was prepared. As a result, the suitability scores were divided into five classes in the range of 0.20–0.90, and thus, the areas were found mostly in the moderate suitability (between 0.49 and 0.64). Consequently, it was determined that the biochar application was very highly suitable in the Aegean and Marmara regions. While the western and central parts of the Mediterranean region had high suitability, Central Anatolia and Southeastern Anatolia regions had very low suitability. The study results also indicated that the requirement for biochar addition was very low in the arable agricultural areas such as Harran in the Southeastern Anatolia region, Çukurova in the Mediterranean region, and Konya and Amasya in the Central Anatolia region. However, there is a need for showing particular attention to the agricultural areas of the Aegean Region, Ergene in the Marmara Region, and Iğdır in the Eastern Anatolian region due to higher biochar need for intensive agriculture.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Soilgrids (2019)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed HP, Schoenau JJ (2015) Effects of biochar on yield, nutrient recovery, and soil properties in a canola (Brassica napus L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation grown under controlled environmental conditions. Bioenergy Res 8:1183–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajiboye GA, Hammed SG, Bada SB, Adesodun JK, Dare MO, Mesele SA (2019) Changes in the morphogenetic and physicochemical properties of an alfisol as affected by the healing period after charcoal production. Commun Soil Sci Plan 50:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1563099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy E, Panagos P, Montanarella L, Jones A (2010) Integration of the soil database of turkey into European soil database 1:1.000.000. JRC scientific and technical research report, Italy, p 54

  • Alkharabsheh HM, Seleiman MF, Battaglia ML, Shami A, Jalal RS, Alhammad BA, Almutairi KF, Al-Saif AM (2021) Biochar and its broad impacts in soil quality and fertility, nutrient leaching and crop productivity: a review. Agronomy 11:993. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyanwu IN, Alo MN, Onyekwere AM, Crosse JD, Nworie O, Chamba EB (2018) Influence of biochar aged in acidic soil on ecosystem engineers and two tropical agricultural plants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 153:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin F, Sarptas H (2020) Spatial assessment of site suitability for solar desalination plants: a case study of the coastal regions of Turkey. Clean Techn Environ Policy 22:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01783-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BEPA (2016) Ministry of energy and natural resources: Turkish biomass energy potential map http://bepa.yegm.gov.tr/ (in Turkish). Accessed 10 May 2017

  • BİLGEM (2018) Toprak Organik Karbonu Projesi Teknik Raporu (Technical Report of Soil Organic Carbon Project), Project No: 100311 (in Turkish)

  • Bilgili et al (2019) The effects of biochars produced from the residues of locally grown crops on soil quality variables and indexes. Geoderma 345:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun EW, Petersen CT, Hansen E, Holm JK, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2014) Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use Manag 30:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cangir C, Kapur S, Boyraz D, Akca E, Eswaran H (2000) An assessment of land resource consumption in relation to land degradation in Turkey. J Soil Water Conserv 55:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • CEM (2018) Soil organic carbon project, technical report in Turkish, Ankara, Turkey, p 36

  • Chathurika JAS, Kumaragamage D, Zvomuya F, Akinremi OO, Flaten DN, Indraratne SP, Dandeniya WS (2016) Woodchip biochar with or without synthetic fertilizers affects soil properties and available phosphorus in two alkaline, chernozemic soils. Can J Soil Sci 96:472–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cong WW, Meng J, Ying SC (2018) Impact of soil properties on the soil methane flux response to biochar addition: a meta-analysis. Environ Sci Proc Impacts 20:1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EM00278A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CORINE Land Cover data (2012) https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover. Accessed 10 Nov 2018

  • Du ZJ, **ao YT, Qi XB, Liu YA, Fan XY, Li ZY (2018) Peanut-shell biochar and biogas slurry improve soil properties in the North China plain: a four-year field study. Sci Rep 8:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Naggar A, Lee SS, Rinklebe J, Farooq M, Song H, Sarmah AK, Zimmerman AR, Ahmad M, Shaheen SM, Ok YS (2019) Biochar application to low fertility soils: a review of current status, and future prospects. Geoderma 337:536–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) (1969). Accessed 06 Oct 2018

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2015) Soils help to combat and adapt to climate change by playing a key role in the carbon cycle. Accessed 20 Mar 2019

  • Gunal E, Erdem H, Celik I (2018) Effects of three different biochars amendment on water retention of silty loam and loamy soils. Agric Water Manag 208:232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall GB, Wang F, Subaryono (1992) Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environ Plan A 24:497–516. https://doi.org/10.1068/a240497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M, **ong X, Wang L, Hou D, Bolan NS, Ok YS, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW (2021) A critical review on performance indicators for evaluating soil biota and soil health of biochar-amended soils. J Hazard Mater 414:125378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Gonzalez MR, Kilibarda M, Blagotić A, Shangguan W, Wright MN, Geng X, Bauer-Marschallinger B, Guevara MA, Vargas R, MacMillan RA (2017) SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobley E, Wilson B, Wilkie A, Gray J, Koen T (2015) Drivers of soil organic carbon storage and vertical distribution in Eastern Australia. Plant Soil 390:111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2380-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski P (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:251–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799508902036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agr Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H, Eastman JR (2000) Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588100240903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2010) Fuzzy data standardization. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18:745–754. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2047948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur S, Akca E, Kapur B, Ozturk A (2006) Migration: an irreversible impact of land degradation in Turkey. In: Kepner WG, Rubio JL, Mouat DA, Pedrazzini F (eds) Desertification in the Mediterranean region. A security issue. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur S, Akca E, Gunal H (2018) The soils of Turkey. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krapfl KJ, Hatten JA, Roberts SD, Baldwin BS, Rousseau RJ, Shankle MW (2014) Soil properties, nitrogen status, and switchgrass productivity in a biochar-amended silty clay loam. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:S136–S145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu O, Kocar G (2017) Biochar from residual biomass in Turkey, and possibility of return to the soil: an estimation of the supply and demand. Pol J Agron 30:10–24

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark Labs (1987). Product: Terrset. Accessed 06 Nov 2018

  • Lal R (2016) Biochar and soil carbon sequestration. In: Guo M, He G, Uchimiya SM (eds) Agricultural and environmental applications of biochar: advances and barriers. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 175–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Latawiec AE, Peake L, Baxter H, Cornelissen G, Grotkiewicz K, Hale S, Krolczyk JB, Kubon M, Lopatka A, Medynska-Juraszek A, Reid BJ, Siebielec G, Sohi SP, Spiak Z, Strassburg BBN (2017) A reconnaissance-scale GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis to support sustainable biochar use: Poland as a case study. J Environ Eng Landsc 25:208–222. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2017.1326924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph ST (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph ST (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology, 1st edn. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang B, Lehmann J, Solomon D, Kinyangi J, Grossman J, O’Neill B, Skjemstad JO, Thies J, Luizao FJ, Petersen J, Neves EG (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XY, Zhang AF, Ji CY, Joseph S, Bian RJ, Li LQ, Pan GX, Paz-Ferreiro J (2013) Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions-a meta-analysis of literature data. Plant Soil 373:583–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1806-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Chu WY, Li H, Boyd SA, Teppen BJ, Mao JD, Lehmann J, Zhang W (2019) Quantification and characterization of dissolved organic carbon from biochars. Geoderma 335:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald LM, Farrell M, Van Zwieten L, Krull ES (2014) Plant growth responses to biochar addition: an Australian soils perspective. Biol Fertil Soils 50:1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-014-0921-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, Rinner C (2015) Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Advances in geographic information science. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Namli A, Akça MO, Akça H (2017) Tarımsal atıklardan elde edilen biyokömürün buğday bitkisinin gelişimi ve bazı toprak özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Toprak Bilimi Ve Bitki Besleme Dergisi 5(1):39–47 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbahce A, Sonmez B, Akgul S, Kececi M (2018) Establishment of geographical database of the productivity and the soil organic carbon content for Turkey's soils (in Turkish). In: TAGEM/TSKAD/11/A13/P03, P.r. (Ed.), p 97

  • Ozdemir S, Nuhoglu NN, Dede OH, Yetilmezsoy K (2018) Mitigation of soil loss from turfgrass cultivation by utilizing poultry abattoir sludge compost and biochar on low-organic matter soil. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1502363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, Zimmerman AR, Pandit BH, Cornelissen G (2018) Multi-year double crop** biochar field trials in Nepal: finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis. Sci Total Environ 637:1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin P, Wang HL, Yang X, He LZ, Muller K, Shaheen SM, Xu S, Rinklebe J, Tsang DCW, Ok YS, Bolan N, Song ZL, Che L, Xu XY (2018) Bamboo- and pig-derived biochars reduce leaching losses of dibutyl phthalate, cadmium, and lead from co-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 198:450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MT, Zhu QH, Zhang ZB, Zhou H, Peng X (2017) The roles of organic amendments and microbial community in the improvement of soil structure of a vertisol. Appl Soil Ecol 111:84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senbayram M, Saygan EP, Chen R, Aydemir S, Kaya C, Wu D, Bladogatskaya E (2019) Effect of biochar origin and soil type on the greenhouse gas emission and the bacterial community structure in N fertilised acidic sandy and alkaline clay soil. Sci Total Environ 660:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soilgrids (2019) https://soilgrids.org/. Accessed 08 July 2021

  • Sonmez B, Ozbahce A, Kececi M, Akgul S, Aksoy E, Madenoglu S, Karabulut-Aloe A, Incirkus V, Gorgisen C, Tuncay T, Beernearts I, Vergas R (2017) Turkey's national geospatial soil organic carbon information system. In: Global symposium on soil organic carbon, Rome, Italy

  • Uyan M (2017) Optimal site selection for solar power plants using multi-criteria evaluation: a case study from the Ayranci region in Karaman, Turkey. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19:2231–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1405-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccari FP, Baronti S, Lugato E, Genesio L, Castaldi S, Fornasier F, Miglietta F (2011) Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. Eur J Agron 34:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Outline of the manuscript and methodology were designed by FA-K and OK. Data collection and GIS-MCE analysis were performed by FA-Kr. Results were evaluated by OK and FA-K. The first draft of the manuscript was written by FA-K, OK and HS, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulya Aydin-Kandemir.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kutlu, O., Aydin-Kandemir, F. & Sarptas, H. Assessing primary areas for a sustainable biochar application in soil by using GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, 2443–2455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02163-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02163-3

Keywords

Navigation