Log in

Ecological validity of performance-based cognitive screeners in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: preliminary evidence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed at preliminarily assessing, in a cohort of non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, the ecological validity, and more specifically the veridicality, of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) and the ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS™), by relating their scores to caregiver-report ratings of cognitive changes.

Methods

N = 147 patient-caregiver dyads were recruited. Patients were administered the ECAS and ALS-CBS™, whilst caregiver the Caregiver Behavioral Questionnaire (CBQ) and Beaumont Behavioural Inventory (BBI). An Ecological Cognitive Functioning Index (ECFI) was derived from those items of the CBQ and BBI that tap on executive and language changes. Ecological validity was assessed via both correlational and predictive analyses net of caregiver-rated behavioural changes (as assessed by the ECAS-Carer Interview).

Results

The ECFI was associated with the total scores on both the ECAS (p = .014) and ALS-CBS™ (p = .017). When looking at ECAS and ALS-CBS™ subscales, those assessing verbal fluency were selectively associated with the ECFI. The ECFI was higher in patients performing defectively on the ECAS (p = .004) and on the ALS-CBS™ (p = .027).

Discussion

This study suggests that both the ECAS and the ALS-CBS™ represent a valid estimate of non-demented ALS patients’ cognitive status in the real world, also highlighting the clinical relevance of cognitive changes reported by caregivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Datasets associated with the present study have been stored on an online repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12179998). These datasets cannot be made publicly available on ethical-legal grounds but can be made available upon reasonable request of interested researchers to the corresponding author, who will forward a request for a data transfer agreement to the relevant Ethical Committee.

References

  1. Strong MJ, Abrahams S, Goldstein LH, Woolley S, Mclaughlin P, Snowden J et al (2017) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): revised diagnostic criteria. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 18(3–4):153–174

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Huynh W, Ahmed R, Mahoney CJ, Nguyen C, Tu S, Caga J et al (2020) The impact of cognitive and behavioral impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother 20(3):281–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolley SC, York MK, Moore DH, Strutt AM, Murphy J, Schulz PE et al (2010) Detecting frontotemporal dysfunction in ALS: utility of the ALS cognitive behavioral screen (ALS-CBS™). Amyotroph Lateral Scler 11(3):303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrahams S, Newton J, Niven E, Foley J, Bak TH (2014) Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 15(1–2):9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon N, Goldstein LH (2019) Screening for cognitive and behavioral change in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease: a systematic review of validated screening methods. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 20(1–2):1–1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gosselt IK, Nijboer TC, Van Es MA (2020) An overview of screening instruments for cognition and behavior in patients with ALS: selecting the appropriate tool for clinical practice. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 21(5–6):324–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taule T, Søvik M, Lein RK, Wehling E, Aßmus J, Rekand T (2020) Psychometric properties of cognitive assessment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 22:181–194

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2003) The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev 13:181–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aiello EN, Rimoldi S, Bolognini N, Appollonio I, Arcara G (2022) Psychometrics and diagnostics of Italian cognitive screening tests: a systematic review. Neurol Sci 43:821–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL (2000) El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 1(5):293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF et al (2011) Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76(11):1006–1014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, Mendez MF, Kramer JH, Neuhaus J et al (2011) Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 134(9):2456–2477

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tremolizzo L, Lizio A, Santangelo G, Diamanti S, Lunetta C, Gerardi F et al (2020) ALS Cognitive Behavioral Screen (ALS-CBS): normative values for the Italian population and clinical usability. Neurol Sci 41:835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poletti B, Solca F, Carelli L, Madotto F, Lafronza A, Faini A et al (2016) The validation of the Italian Edinburgh cognitive and behavioural ALS screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 17(7–8):489–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aiello EN, Solca F, Greco LC, La Tona A, Torre S, Carelli L et al (2023) Standardization of the Italian ALS-CBS™ caregiver behavioral questionnaire. Front Psychol 13:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iazzolino B, Pain D, Laura P, Aiello EN, Gallucci M, Radici A et al (2022) Italian adaptation of the Beaumont Behavioral Inventory (BBI): psychometric properties and clinical usability. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 23(1–2):81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poletti B, Aiello EN, Solca F et al (2023) Diagnostic properties of the Italian ECAS Carer Interview (ECAS-CI). Neurol Sci 44:941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cedarbaum JM, Stambler N, Malta E, Fuller C, Hilt D, Thurmond B et al (1999) The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function. J Neurol Sci 169(1–2):13–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kimura FC, Fujimura C, Ishida S, Nakajima H, Furutama D, Uehara H et al (2006) Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology 66(2):265–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roche JC, Rojas-Garcia R, Scott KM, Scotton W, Ellis CE, Burman R et al (2012) A proposed staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 135(3):847–852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chiò A, Hammond ER, Mora G, Bonito V, Filippini G (2015) Development and evaluation of a clinical staging system for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(1):38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HY (2013) Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod 38(1):52–54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Green JA (2021) Too many zeros and/or highly skewed? A tutorial on modelling health behaviour as count data with Poisson and negative binomial regression. Health Psychol Behav Med 9(1):436–455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Aiello EN, Greco LC, La Tona A, Solca F, Torre S, Carelli L et al (2023) Clinimetrics of the cognitive section of the Italian ALS cognitive behavioral screen (ALS-CBS™). Neurol Sci 44(4):1243–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Abrahams S, Leigh PN, Harvey A, Vythelingum GN, Grise D, Goldstein LH (2000) Verbal fluency and executive dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Neuropsychologia 38:734–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Canu E, Castelnovo V, Rancoita PM, Leocadi M, Lamanuzzi A, Spinelli EG et al (2023) Italian reference values and brain correlates of verbal fluency index–vs standard verbal fluency test–to assess executive dysfunction in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener, 1–9

  27. Whiteside DM, Kealey T, Semla M, Luu H, Rice L, Basso MR et al (2016) Verbal fluency: language or executive function measure? Appl Neuropsychol Adult 23(1):29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aita SL, Beach JD, Taylor SE, Borgogna NC, Harrell MN, Hill BD (2019) Executive, language, or both? An examination of the construct validity of verbal fluency measures. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 26(5):441–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McMillan CT, Wuu J, Rascovsky K, Cosentino S, Grossman M, Elman L et al (2022) Defining cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an evaluation of empirical approaches. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 23(7–8):517–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Aiello EN, Iazzolino B, Pain D, Peotta L, Palumbo F, Radici A et al (2022) The diagnostic value of the Italian version of the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen (ECAS). Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 23(7–8):527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Solca F, Aiello EN, Torre S, Carelli L, Ferrucci R, Verde F, Ticozzi N et al (2023) Prevalence and determinants of language impairment in non-demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol 30(3):606–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinto-Grau M, Hardiman O, Pender N (2018) The study of language in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal spectrum disorder: a systematic review of findings and new perspectives. Neuropsychol Rev 28:251–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aiello EN, Feroldi S, Preti AN, Zago S, Appollonio IM (2022) Dysgraphic features in motor neuron disease: a review. Aphasiology 36(10):1249–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Crockford C, Newton J, Lonergan K et al (2018) ALS-specific cognitive and behavior changes associated with advancing disease stage in ALS. Neurology 91:e1370–e1380

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chiò A, Moglia C, Canosa A et al (2019) Cognitive impairment across ALS clinical stages in a population-based cohort. Neurology 93:e984–e994

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pfeifer L, Drobetz R, Fankhauser S, Mortby ME, Maercker A, Forstmeier S (2013) Caregiver rating bias in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease: impact of caregiver burden and depression on dyadic rating discrepancy across domains. Int Psychogeriatr 25(8):1345–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

the Authors are thankful to patients and their caregivers. The Authors acknowledge the support of the Italian Ministry of Health – Ricerca Corrente and of the Italian Ministry of Education and Research (“Dipartimenti di Eccellenza” Program 2023–2027 - Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, “Dino Ferrari” Center, Università degli Studi di Milano).

Funding

This work was supported by Italian Ministry of Health - Ricerca Finalizzata (RF-2021-12374238).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ENA: conceptualization, analyses, drafting, revision; FS, BC, GDL: analyses, drafting, revision; CG, AC, EC, AM: data collection, revision; CM, SM, AD, FV, VS: resources, revision; BP, NT: resources, drafting, revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Poletti.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Participants provided informed consent. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (I.D.: 2013_06_25).

Disclosure

V. S. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Ave**s, Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, Liquidweb S.r.l., and Novartis Pharma AG, receives or has received research supports from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA, and E-Rare Joint Transnational Call. He is in the Editorial Board of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, European Neurology, American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Frontiers in Neurology. B.P. received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Liquidweb S.r.l. She is Associate Editor for Frontier in Neuroscience. N. T. received compensation for consulting services from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and Zambon Biotech SA. He is Associate Editor for Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. E.N.A. serves as an Editorial Board Member for BMC Neurology. F.V. is Associated Editor for Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease.

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aiello, E.N., Torre, S., Solca, F. et al. Ecological validity of performance-based cognitive screeners in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: preliminary evidence. Neurol Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07660-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-024-07660-z

Keywords

Navigation