Log in

Effect of gas tightness-controlled compartment system on quality kee** of fresh produce stored in household refrigerator

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Refrigerator chill compartments with volumes of 22-L were fabricated, which had different gas tightness properties to gas or water vapor, ranging from 1,770 to 107,000 mL/hr·m2·atm in CO2 permeance at 25°C. Those compartments were filled with prepared fresh vegetables, and then their ability to preserve the quality at 3°C for 14 days was compared. The internal atmosphere and humidity were monitored together with the stored produce quality. The air-tight compartment with the lowest permeance created an atmosphere slightly different from air (CO2 0.8–1.6%; O2 19.7–20.4%), while the other ones had atmospheres of normal air. The relative humidity of the compartments ranged from 52 to 97%. Two air-tight compartments, maintaining a relative humidity mostly higher than 95%, preserved the produce better than the conventional open type one, with reduced weight loss and better retentions of ascorbic acid and chlorophyll.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson AK. Controlled Atmosphere Storage of Fruits and Vegetables. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. pp. 14–55 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dijkink BH, Tomassen MM, Willemsen JHA, van Doorn WG. Humidity control during bell pepper storage, using a hollow fiber membrane contactor system. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 32: 311–320 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans J. Consumer perceptions and practice in the handling of chilled foods. pp. 1–24. In: Sous Vide and Cook-Chill Processing for the Food Industry. Ghazala S (ed). Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogh-Sorensen L, Olsson P. The chill chain. pp. 245–267. In: Chilled Foods, the State of the Art. Gormley TR (ed). Elsevier Applied Science, London, UK (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masjuki HH, Saidur R, Choudhury IA, Mahlia TMI. Factors effecting energy consumption of household refrigerator-freezers. pp. 92–96. In: TENCON 2000 Proceedings September 24–27, Renaissance-New World Hotel, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermes CJL, Melo C, Knabben FT, Gonçalves JM. Prediction of the energy consumption of household refrigerators and freezers via steady-state simulation. Appl. Energ. 86: 1311–1319 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kader AA, Saltveit ME. Atmosphere modification. pp. 229–246. In: Postharvest Physiology and Pathology of Vegetables. Bartz JA, Brecht JK (eds). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yam KL, Lee DS. Design of modified atmosphere packaging for fresh produce. pp. 55–73. In: Active Food Packaging. Rooney ML (ed). Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seo GH, Chung SK, An DS, Lee DS. Permeabilities of Korean earthenware containers and their potential for packaging fresh produce. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 14: 82–88 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee DS, Yam KL, Piergiovanni L. Food Packaging Science and Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 79–108 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozdemir I, Monnet F, Gouble B. Simple determination of the O2 and CO2 permeances of microperforated pouches for modified atmosphere packaging of respiring foods. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 36: 209–213 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez J, Ferrer A, Oria R, Salvador ML. Determination of O2 and CO2 transmission rates through microperforated films for modified atmosphere packaging of fresh fruits and vegetables. J. Food Eng. 86: 194–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. 16th ed. Method 967.21. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacKinney GJ. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 140: 315–322 (1941)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paull RE. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on fresh commodity quality. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 15: 263–277 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wills RBH, McGlasson WB, Graham D, Lee TH, Hall EG. Postharvest. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA. pp. 53–60 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahajan PV, Goswami TK. Enzyme kinetics based modelling of respiration rate for apple. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 79: 399–406 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ben-Yehoshua S, Rodov V. Transpiration and water loss. pp. 111–159. In: Postharvest Physiology and Pathology of Vegetables. Bartz JA, Brecht JK (eds). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Sun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.J., An, D.S., Kim, J. et al. Effect of gas tightness-controlled compartment system on quality kee** of fresh produce stored in household refrigerator. Food Sci Biotechnol 19, 1587–1592 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0225-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-010-0225-5

Keywords

Navigation