Log in

Preoperative beta-blocker treatment is a key for deciding left ventricular assist device implantation strategy as a bridge to recovery

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, there have been few reports demonstrating preoperative predictors for left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) after LV assist device (LVAD) implantation, especially among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients with stage D heart failure due to DCM who had received LVAD treatment [pulsatile flow (PF) type, 26; continuous flow type, 34]. Data were evaluated at 6 months or just before explantation of the LVAD. We defined “LV reverse remodeling” (LVRR) by the achievement of an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥35 % after 6 months of LVAD support or explantation of LVAD within 6 months. LVRR occurred in 16 of our patients (26.7 %). Uni/multivariate logistic regression analyses for LVRR demonstrated that of the preoperative variables evaluated, PF LVAD usage and insufficient preoperative β-blocker treatment were independent predictors for LVRR. Patients who accomplished LVRR had a better clinical course, including lower levels of aortic valve insufficiency and lower levels of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide. Of the six patients (10.0 %) in whom LVADs were eventually explanted, all had an LVEF of ≥35 % before explantation or at 6 months. Based on these results, we conclude that DCM patients with insufficient preoperative β-blocker treatment have a chance to achieve LVRR under LVAD support as a bridge to recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kinugawa K. How to treat stage D heart failure?—when to implant left ventricular assist devices in the era of continuous flow pumps? Circ J. 2011;75:2038–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klotz S, Jan Danser AH, Burkhoff D. Impact of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support on the cardiac reverse remodeling process. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008;97:479–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkhoff D, Klotz S, Mancini DM. LVAD-induced reverse remodeling: basic and clinical implications for myocardial recovery. J Card Fail. 2006;12:227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hori M, Nagai R, Izumi T, Matsuzaki M. Efficacy and safety of bisoprolol fumarate compared with carvedilol in Japanese patients with chronic heart failure: results of the randomized, controlled, double-blind, Multistep Administration of bisoprolol IN Chronic Heart Failure II (MAIN-CHF II) study. Heart Vessels. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00380-013-0340-3

  5. McKelvie RS, Yusuf S, Pericak D, Avezum A, Burns RJ, Probstfield J, Tsuyuki RT, White M, Rouleau J, Latini R, Maggioni A, Young J, Pogue J. Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. Circulation. 1999;100:1056–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato TS, Chokshi A, Singh P, Khawaja T, Cheema F, Akashi H, Shahzad K, Iwata S, Homma S, Takayama H, Naka Y, Jorde U, Farr M, Mancini DM, Schulze PC. Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4:546–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Drakos SG, Wever-Pinzon O, Selzman CH, Gilbert EM, Alharethi R, Reid BB, Saidi A, Diakos NA, Stoker S, Davis ES, Movsesian M, Li DY, Stehlik J, Kfoury AG. Magnitude and time course of changes induced by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device unloading in chronic heart failure: insights into cardiac recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1985–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maybaum S, Mancini D, Xydas S, Starling RC, Aaronson K, Pagani FD, Miller LW, Margulies K, McRee S, Frazier OH, Torre-Amione G. Cardiac improvement during mechanical circulatory support: a prospective multicenter study of the LVAD Working Group. Circulation. 2007;115:2497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nishimura T, Kyo S. High-dose carvedilol therapy for mechanical circulatory assisted patients. J Artif Organs. 2010;13:88–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Timothy Baldwin J, JB Young. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2013;32:141–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Madigan JD, Barbone A, Choudhri AF, Morales DL, Cai B, Oz MC, Burkhoff D. Time course of reverse remodeling of the left ventricle during support with a left ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:902–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon MA, Primack BA, Teuteberg J, Kormos RL, Bermudez C, Toyoda Y, Shah H, Gorcsan J 3rd, McNamara DM. Left ventricular remodeling and myocardial recovery on mechanical circulatory support. J Card Fail. 2010;16:99–105.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guglin M, Miller L. Myocardial recovery with left ventricular assist devices. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2012;14:370–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamarche Y, Kearns M, Josan K, Bashir J, Ignaszewski A, Kaan A, Kealy J, Moss R, Cheung A. Successful weaning and explantation of the heartmate II left ventricular assist device. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farrar DJ, Holman WR, McBride LR, Kormos RL, Icenogle TB, Hendry PJ, Moore CH, Loisance DY, El-Banayosy A, Frazier H. Long-term follow-up of Thoratec ventricular assist device bridge-to-recovery patients successfully removed from support after recovery of ventricular function. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2002;21:516–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon MA, Kormos RL, Murali S, Nair P, Heffernan M, Gorcsan J, Winowich S, McNamara DM. Myocardial recovery using ventricular assist devices: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Circulation. 2005;112:I32–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito S, Matsumiya G, Sakaguchi T, Miyagawa S, Yamauchi T, Kuratani T, Sawa Y. Cardiac fibrosis and cellular hypertrophy decrease the degree of reverse remodeling and improvement in cardiac function during left ventricular assist. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2010;29:672–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsumiya G, Monta O, Fukushima N, Sawa Y, Funatsu T, Toda K, Matsuda H. Who would be a candidate for bridge to recovery during prolonged mechanical left ventricular support in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:699–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thohan V, Stetson SJ, Nagueh SF, Rivas-Gotz C, Koerner MM, Lafuente JA, Loebe M, Noon GP, Torre-Amione G. Cellular and hemodynamics responses of failing myocardium to continuous flow mechanical circulatory support using the DeBakey-Noon left ventricular assist device: a comparative analysis with pulsatile-type devices. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2005;24:566–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Haft J, Armstrong W, Dyke DB, Aaronson KD, Koelling TM, Farrar DJ, Pagani FD. Hemodynamic and exercise performance with pulsatile and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2007;116:I8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klotz S, Deng MC, Stypmann J, Roetker J, Wilhelm MJ, Hammel D, Scheld HH, Schmid C. Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(1):143–149 (discussion 9–50).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toda K, Fujita T, Domae K, Shimahara Y, Kobayashi J, Nakatani T. Late aortic insufficiency related to poor prognosis during left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:929–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hatano M, Kinugawa K, Shiga T, Kato N, Endo M, Hisagi M, Nishimura T, Yao A, Hirata Y, Kyo S, Ono M, Nagai R. Less frequent opening of the aortic valve and a continuous flow pump are risk factors for postoperative onset of aortic insufficiency in patients with a left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2011;75:1147–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, Sun B, Tatooles AJ, Delgado RM 3rd, Long JW, Wozniak TC, Ghumman W, Farrar DJ, Frazier OH. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshioka D, Sakaguchi T, Saito S, Miyagawa S, Nishi H, Yoshikawa Y, Fukushima S, Ueno T, Kuratani T, Sawa Y. Initial experience of conversion of Toyobo paracorporeal left ventricular assist device to DuraHeart left ventricular assist device. Circ J. 2012;76:372–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel SR, Saeed O, Murthy S, Bhatia V, Shin JJ, Wang D, Negassa A, Pullman J, Goldstein DJ, Maybaum S. Combining neurohormonal blockade with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support for myocardial recovery: a single-arm prospective study. J Heart Lung Transpl. 2013;32:305–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Birks EJ, Tansley PD, Hardy J, George RS, Bowles CT, Burke M, Banner NR, Khaghani A, Yacoub MH. Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1873–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grant-in-Aid from Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology to K.K.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Teruhiko Imamura or Koichiro Kinugawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imamura, T., Kinugawa, K., Hatano, M. et al. Preoperative beta-blocker treatment is a key for deciding left ventricular assist device implantation strategy as a bridge to recovery. J Artif Organs 17, 23–32 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0748-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0748-7

Keywords

Navigation