Log in

„damage control surgery“ bei schweren abdominellen Verletzungen

Damage control surgery in severe abdominal trauma

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Trauma und Berufskrankheit

Zusammenfassung

Das Konzept der Versorgung schwerster abdomineller Verletzungen nach Prinzipien des „damage control“ findet auch im deutschen Sprachraum zunehmend Verbreitung. Die Indikation zur „damage control“-Versorgung stellt sich bei Vorliegen der Trias Azidose, Hypothermie und Koagulopathie (AHK-Syndrom). Als Zugang wird eine Medianlaparotomie gewählt. Bei Hohlorganverletzungen wird keine primäre Anastomose erzwungen, im Vordergrund steht die Kontaminationskontrolle. Methoden der Wahl sind die Anlage eines Anus praeter oder der temporäre Blindverschluss. Bei Milzrupturen steht die Splenektomie im Vordergrund. Massiv blutende Leberverletzungen werden durch Packing ggf. mit temporärer Gefäßokklusion kontrolliert. Abschließend erfolgt ein temporärer Bauchdeckenverschluss. Nach intensivmedizinischer Stabilisierung wird eine definitive Versorgung im Intervall vorgenommen.

Abstract

The concept of treating severe abdominal trauma according to the principles of damage control surgery is becoming more widespread in Germany. Damage control surgery is indicated when evidence of AHC syndrome, meaning the combination of acidosis, hypothermia and coagulopathy, is found. The preferred surgical approach is the median laparotomy. In hollow organ injury a primary anastomosis should not be forced; contamination control is far more important. Methods of choice are construction of an anus preter or temporary blind closure. In the case of splenic injury total splenectomy is commonly performed. Liver injuries with massive bleeding should be controlled by packing or interim vascular occlusion, with subsequent temporary closure of the abdominal wall. Definitive organ repair should follow stabilization in the intensive care unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Abikhaled JA, Granchi TS, Wall MJ et al. (1997) Prolonged abdominal packing for trauma is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Am Surg 63: 1109–1112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akwari OE (1994) Midline incision opening and closing. In: Sabiston DC, Gordon RG (eds) Atlas of general surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia

  3. Asensio JA, McDuffie L, Petrone P et al. (2001) Reliable variables in the exsanguinated patient which indicate damage control and predict outcome. Am J Surg 182: 743–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aufmkolk M, Nast-Kolb D (2001) Abdominaltrauma. Unfallchirurg 72: 861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balogh Z, McKinley BA, Holcomb JB et al. (2003) Both primary and secondary abdominal compartment syndrome can be predicted early and are harbingers of multiple organ failure. J Trauma 54: 848–859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Basso N, Silecchia G, Raparelli L et al. (2003) Laparoscopic splenectomy for ruptured spleen: lessons learned from a case. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 109–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergeron E, Clas D, Ratte S et al. (2002) Impact of deferred treatment of blunt diaphragmatic rupture: a 15-year experience in six trauma centers in Quebec. J Trauma 52: 633–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brasel KJ, Weigelt JA (2000) Damage control in trauma surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care 6: 276–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrillo C, Fogler RJ, Shaftan GW (1993) Delayed gastrointestinal reconstruction following massive abdominal trauma. J Trauma 34: 233–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Committee on Technology for Future Naval Forces, National Research Council (1997) Technology for the United States Navy and Marine Corps 2000–2035. Becoming a 21st Century Force. The National Academic Press, Washington

  11. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Chan L et al. (2001) Committee on Multicenter Clinical Trials, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma: Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 50: 765–775

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekkernkamp A, Brand J, Wernet E et al. (1992) Was beeinflusst das Outcome nach Abdominaltrauma? Eine Analyse von 558 Patienten. Unfallchirurg 95: 380–386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ertel W, Oberholzer A, Platz A et al. (2000) Incidence and clinical pattern of the abdominal compartment syndrome after „damage-control“ laparotomy in 311 patients with severe abdominal and/or pelvic trauma. Crit Care Med 28: 1747–1753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eshraghi N, Mullins RJ, Mayberry JC et al. (1998) Surveyed opinion of American trauma surgeons in management of colon injuries. J Trauma 44: 93–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gordon-Taylor G (1942) Second thoughts on the abdominal surgery of „total war“ — a review of over 1300 cases. Br J Surg 32: 247–258

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grantcharov TP, Rosenberg J (2001) Vertical compared with transverse incisions in abdominal surgery. Eur J Surg 167: 260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gravlee JR, Schwenk TL (2003) Management choices for splenic injury in a collegiate football player. Curr Sports Med Rep 2: 211–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iannelli A, Fabiani P, Karimdjee BS et al. (2003) Therapeutic laparoscopy for blunt abdominal trauma with bowel injuries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 189–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klar E, Angelescu M, Richter G et al. (1999) Aktuelle Therapie bei Verletzungen des hepatobiliopankreatischen Kompartments. Chirurg 70: 1255–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kremer B, Henne-Bruns D (1993) Wertigkeit der verschiedenen Techniken bei der Leberruptur. Chirurg 64: 852–859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krishna G, Sleigh JW, Rahman H (1998) Physiological predictors of death in exsanguinating trauma patients undergoing conventional trauma surgery. ANZ J Surg 68: 826–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loveland JA, Boffard KD (2004) Damage control in the abdomen and beyond. Br J Surg 91: 1095–1011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morken JJ, Muehlstedt SG, Danielson DS et al. (2001) Temporary abdominal closure (TAC): Bogota bag is superior to skin closure (abstract). American Association for the Surgery of Trauma,http://www.aast.org

  24. Offner PJ, De Souza AL, Moore EE et al. (2001) Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma. Arch Surg 136: 676–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patnaik VVG, Singla RK, Bansal VK (2001) Surgical incisions — their anatomical basis. Part IV — abdomen. J Nat Soc India 50: 170–178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raeburn CD, Moore EE, Biffl WL et al. (2001) The abdominal compartment syndrome is a morbid complication of postinjury damage control surgery. Am J Surg 182: 542–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ren CJ, Salky B, Reiner M (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for ruptured spleen. Surg Endosc 15: 324

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rotondo MF, Zonies DH (1997) The damage control sequence and underlying logic. Surg Clin N Am 77: 761–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD et al. (1993) ‚Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma 35: 375–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scheele J (1981) Erste klinische Erfahrung mit der Fibrinklebung bei traumatischen und intraoperativen Milzverletzungen. Chirurg 52: 531–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shapiro MB, Jenkins DH, Schwab CW et al. (2000) Damage control: collective review. J Trauma 49: 969–978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ (1983) Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg 197: 532–535

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Velanovich V (1995) Blunt splenic injury in adults: a decision analysis comparing options for treatment. Eur J Surg 161: 463–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG et al. (2001) Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg 234: 395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wallace C (1917) Gunshot wounds of the abdomen: a study of 1200 cases of gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Br J Surg 4: 679–743

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wick M, Ekkernkamp A, Muhr G (1997) Die Epidemiologie des Polytrauma. Chirurg 68: 1053–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wisner DH (2004) Injury to the spleen. In: Moore EE, Feliciano DV, Mattox KL (eds) Trauma, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Matthes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthes, G., Bauwens, K., Ekkernkamp, A. et al. „damage control surgery“ bei schweren abdominellen Verletzungen. Trauma Berufskrankh 8, 13–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-006-1103-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-006-1103-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation