Log in

The liquefaction cycle and the role of drainage in liquefaction

  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work the liquefaction cycle is introduced as a framework to describe the coupled processes that take place in fluid-saturated granular media that lead to liquefaction. The modular formulation of liquefaction makes it possible to test the various processes that contribute to liquefaction separately, and to assemble different formulations of the relevant physics into a numerical model for liquefaction. This view on liquefaction is used here to assess the role of drainage in liquefaction. We present a simple scale analysis of the role of drainage. A numerical implementation of the liquefaction cycle shows, however, that the scale analysis is deceptive for the case when strong spatial variations in the permeability inhibit fluid migration. As an illustration the numerical model is used to quantify the imprint of a low-permeability layer on the liquefaction behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Faccioli, D. Reséndiz, Soil dynamics: behavior including liquefaction. In C. Lomnitz & E. Rosenblueth, editors, Seismic risk and engineering decisions, volume 15 of Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, chapter 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (1976), p. 71–139

  2. Committee on earthquake engineering. Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1985

  3. T.L. Youd, Liquefaction mechanisms and induced ground failure. In W.H.K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P.C. Jennings, & C. Kisslinger, editors, International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, part B, Academic Press, (2003), p. 1159–1173

  4. G. Castro, Comments on the determination of the undrained steady state strength of sandy soils. In P.V. Lade & J.A. Yamamuro, editors, Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999), p. 205

  5. J.M. Konrad, A methodology to evaluate the susceptibility of soils for liquefaction flow failures. In P.V. Lade & J.A. Yamamuro, editors, Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999), p. 213

  6. K. Ishihara, Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique, 43 (1993), p. 351–415

  7. B.M. Das, Principles of Soil Dynamics. PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, 1993

  8. T.L. Holzer, T.L. Youd, & T.C. Hanks, Dynamics of liquefaction during the 1987 Superstition Hills, California, earthquake. Science, 244 (1989), p. 56–59

  9. T. Inazaki, Field measurement of nonlinear propery of the soft ground using a shear wave vibrator. In K. Irikura, K. Kudo, H. Okada, & T. Sasatani, editors, The effects of surface geology on seismic motion, Balkema, Rotterdam, (1998), p. 809–814

  10. Z. Yang & A. Elgamal, Influence of permeability on liquefaction-induced shear deformation. J. Eng. Mech., 128 (2002), p. 720–729

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Aki & P.G. Richards, Quantitative Seismology. Univ. Science Books, Sausalito, second edition, 2002

  12. D.R. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Penquin Books, Harmondsworth UK, 1980

  13. R.K. Massarch, Deep compaction of granular soils. In W. Shiming, Z. Wohua, and R.D. Woods, editors, A look back for future geotechnics, chapter 5, Balkema, Rotterdam, (2001), p. 181–223

  14. M.A. Biot, Consolidation settlement under a rectangular load application. J. Appl. Phys., 12 (1941), p. 426–430

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.J. Major, Gravity-driven consolidation of granular slurries; implications for debris-flow deposition and deposit characteristics. J. Sedim. Res., 70 (2000), 64–83

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.F. Wang, Theory of linear poroelasticity, with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2000

  17. H. Nakase, T. Takeda, & M. Oda, A simulation study of liquefaction using dem. In Sêco e Pinto, editor, Earthquake geotechnical engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999), p. 637–642

  18. J.B. Knight, C.G. Fandrich, C.N. Lau, H.M. Jaeger, & S.R. Nagel, Density relaxation in a vibrated granular material. Phys. Rev. E, 51 (1995) p. 3957–3963

  19. K. Ishihara, Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics, volume 46. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996

  20. M. Nicolas, P. Duru, & O. Pouliquen, Compaction of granular material under cyclic shear. Eur. Phys. J. E, 3 (2000), 309–314

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.L. Gavrilov, Cluster model for compaction of vibrated granular materials. Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), p. 2107–2114

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Peng & T. Ohta. Logarithmic density relaxation in compaction of granular materials. Phys. Rev. E., 57 (1998), p. 829–833

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.F. Edwards & D.V. Grinev, Statistical mechanics of vibration-induced compaction of powders. Phys. Rev. E, 58 (1998), p. 4758–4762

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.J. Brey, A. Prados, & B. Sánchez-Rey, Simple model with facilitated dynamics for granular compaction. Phys. Rev. E, 60 (1999), p. 5685–5692

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.J. Linz & Döhle, Minimal relaxation law for compaction of tapped granular matter. Phys. Rev. E, 60 (1999), p. 5737–5741

  26. D.A. Head, Phenemenological glass model for vibratory granular compaction. Phys. Rev. E, 62 (2000), p. 2439–2449

    Google Scholar 

  27. T.L. Youd, Compaction of sands by repeated shear loading. J. Soil. Mech. and Foundations, 98 (1972) p. 709

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.G. Anderson, Strong motion seismology. In W.H.K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P.C. Jennings, & C. Kisslinger, editors, International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, part B. Academic Press, (2003), p. 937–965

  29. R.O. Davis, & J.B. Berrill, Site-specific prediction of liquefaction. Géotechnique, 48 (1998), p. 289–293

  30. J.C. Santamarina, K.A. Klein, & M.A. Fam, Soils and waves. 2001

  31. I. Vardoulakis, Deformation of water-saturated sand: II. Effect of pore water flow and shear banding. Géotechnique 46 (1996), p. 457–472

  32. K. Terzaghi, The shearing resistance of saturated soils. In Proc. of the First International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, volume 1, (1936), p. 54–56

  33. H.B. Seed, R.T. Wong, I.M. Idriss, & K. Tokimatsu, Moduli and dam** factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J. Geotechn. Eng., 112 (1986), p. 1016–1032

    Google Scholar 

  34. D.M.F. Chapman & O.A. Godin, Dispersion of interface waves in sediments with power-law shear speed profiles. II. Experimental observations and seismo-acoustic inversions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110, (2001) p. 1908–1916

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Butkov, Mathematical Physics. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1968

  36. J. Virieux, SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media; velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 49 (1984), p. 1933–1942

  37. G.J. Haltiner & R.T. Williams, Numerical prediction and dynamic meteorology. John Wiley, New York, 1980

  38. T.L. Youd, Physics and mechanics of liquefaction from field records and experience. In P.V. Lade & J.A. Yamamuro, editors, Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction. Balkema, Rotterdam, (1999), p. 325–334

  39. R. Snieder, A Guided Tour of Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge UK, 2001

  40. G.A. Fenton & E.H. Vanmarcke, Spatial variation in liquefaction risk. Géotechnique, 48 (1998) p. 819–831

  41. Port and Harbour Research Institute, editors. Handbook on liquefaction remediation of reclaimed land. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1997

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roel Snieder.

Additional information

We greatly appreciate our conversations with Masami Nakagawa and Vaughan Griffiths about this work. The critical and constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers are very much appreciated. The visit of Annemieke van den Beukel to Golden was supported by the Molengraaff fonds, the Schuurman Schimmel van Outeren Stichting, the Stichting Dr. Hendrik Muller’s Vaderlandsch Fonds, and the Trajectum Fonds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snieder, R., Beukel, A. The liquefaction cycle and the role of drainage in liquefaction. GM 6, 1–9 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-003-0151-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-003-0151-9

Keywords

Navigation