Log in

Correlation of diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy with number of biopsy bits and site of the lesion

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Brain Tumor Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our objective was to examine the reliability of histological diagnosis achieved vis a vis the number of biopsy bits obtained along a single trajectory of the stereotactic needle. A retrospective analysis of stereotactic biopsies performed in a single tertiary care neurosciences center, during a period of 11 years, between 1995 to 2005 was done. The overall diagnostic accuracy achieved on histopathology was correlated with the number of bits obtained by stereotactic biopsy. A total of 86 cases were analyzed, which consisted of 58 males and 28 females. Age ranged from 6 to 75 years, with a mean age of 36.1 years. Twenty percent of the patients were in the pediatric age group and 15% were ≥60 years of age. Most common sites biopsied were thalamus/basal ganglia (55.8%), followed by eloquent areas and other sites. A definitive histological diagnosis was established in 70 cases (diagnostic yield, 81.3%), which encompassed 65 neoplastic and 5 nonneoplastic lesions. Astrocytic lesions, the most common, include 10 pilocytic astrocytomas (PA), 29 diffuse astrocytomas (DA), 11 anaplastic astrocytomas (AA), and 7 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). In 16 cases no definite histological diagnosis could be offered. The number of biopsies ranged between 1 and 6 bits (mean, 2; median, 1). The majority (68.7%) of the biopsies were 1 or 2-bits. The diagnostic accuracy increased from 76.5% for single biopsies to 84% and 88.2% for 2 and 3 bits, respectively, and 100% for biopsies with 5 to 6 bits. Overall, a trend of higher diagnostic yield was seen in cases with more biopsies when compared with single bit biopsies. Thus, this small series confirms that stereotactic procedures involving multiple bits are associated with a high diagnostic yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L Leksell (1949) ArticleTitleA stereotaxic apparatus for intracerebral surgery Acta Chir Scand 99 229–233

    Google Scholar 

  2. PJ Kelly (1986) ArticleTitleComputer assisted stereotaxis. New approaches for the management of intracranial intra axial tumors Neurology 36 535–541 Occurrence Handle3515227 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL287nsFCqug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. RL Bernays SS Kollias N Khan et al. (2002) ArticleTitleHistological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging J Neurousurg 97 354–362

    Google Scholar 

  4. PC Burger JS Nelson (1997) ArticleTitleStereotactic brain biopsies: specimen preparation and evaluation Arch Pathol Lab Med 121 477–480 Occurrence Handle9167600 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szhtVCgsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G Broggi A Franzini C Giorgi A Allegraza (1984) ArticleTitleDiagnostic accuracy multimodal approach in stereotactic biopsies of deep brain tumors Acta Neurochirugica (Suppl) 33 211–212

    Google Scholar 

  6. P Cappabianca R Spaziante F Caputi et al. (1991) ArticleTitleAccuracy of the analysis of multiple small fragments of glial tumors obtained by stereotactic biopsy Acta Cytol 35 505–511 Occurrence Handle1656683 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FisVOhuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MJ Fritsch MJ Leber L Gossett et al. (1998) ArticleTitleStereotactic biopsy of intracranial brain lesions. High diagnostic yield without increased complications: 65 consecutive biopsies with early postoperative CT scans Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 71 36–42 Occurrence Handle10072672 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nt1altw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1159/000029645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MLJ Apuzzo PT Chandrasoma D Cohen CS Zee W Zelma (1987) ArticleTitleComputed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses Neurosurgery 20 930–937 Occurrence Handle3302751 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2s3oslKmtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R Hayden RS Cajulis D Frias-Hidvegi et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIntraoperative diagnostic techniques for stereotactic brain biopsy: cytology versus frozen-section histopathology Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 65 187–193 Occurrence Handle8916352 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FntlKnsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. ND Kitchen R Bradford JE McLaughlin (1993) ArticleTitleThe value of per-operative smear examination during stereotactic biopsy Acta Neurochir (Wien) 121 196–198 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ovFyqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01809275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. BH Liwnicz KS Henderson T Masukawa RD Smith (1982) ArticleTitleNeedle aspiration cytology of intracranial lesions. A review of 84 cases Acta Cytol 26 779–786 Occurrence Handle6961715 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s7it1yjsA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LF Marshall H Adams D Doyle DI Graham (1973) ArticleTitleThe histological accuracy of the smear technique for neurosurgical biopsies J Neurosurg 39 82–88 Occurrence Handle4717143 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE3s3hsVChsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. AJ Martinez I Pollack WA Hall LD Lunsford (1988) ArticleTitleTouch preparations in the rapid intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lesions. A comparison with frozen sections and paraffin-embedded sections Mod Pathol 1 378–384 Occurrence Handle3237713 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M7osVCqsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J Tilgner M Herr C Ostertag B Volk (2005) ArticleTitleValidation of intraoperative diagnoses using smear preparations from stereotactic brain biopsies: intraoperative versus final diagnosis: influence of clinical factors Neurosurgery 56 257–265 Occurrence Handle15670374 Occurrence Handle10.1227/01.NEU.0000148899.39020.87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. KS Firlik AJ Martinez LD Lunsford (1999) ArticleTitleUse of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: a 19-year experience and survey of neuropathologists J Neurosurg 91 454–458 Occurrence Handle10470821 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzpslChsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.3171/jns.1999.91.3.0454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. LM Collaco E Tani I Lindblom L Skoog (2003) ArticleTitleStereotactic biopsy and cytological diagnosis of solid and cystic intracranial lesions Cytopathology 14 131–135 Occurrence Handle12828722 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szgtFCisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00046.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. JA Brainard RA Prayson GH Barnett (1997) ArticleTitleFrozen section evaluation of stereotactic brain biopsies: diagnostic yield at the stereotactic target position in 188 cases Arch Pathol Lab Med 121 481–484 Occurrence Handle9167601 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szhtVCgtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P Grunert K Ungersbock J Bohl et al. (1994) ArticleTitleResults of 200 intracranial stereotactic biopsies Neurosurg Rev 17 59–66 Occurrence Handle8078610 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czlvFKgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00309989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. MC Sharma A Singh A Verma et al. (1998) ArticleTitleDiagnostic yield in computed tomography guided stereotactic biopsies J Assoc Physicians India 46 427–430 Occurrence Handle11273282 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ntlajtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. MJ McGirt AT Villavicencio KR Bulsara AH Friedman (2003) ArticleTitleMRI-guided stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma: comparison of biopsy and surgical resection specimen Surg Neurol 59 277–282 Occurrence Handle12748009 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00048-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. FV Aker T Hakan S Karadereler M Erkan (2005) ArticleTitleAccuracy and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimens Neuropathology 25 207–213 Occurrence Handle16193837 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1440-1789.2005.00634.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. JJ Kepes (1994) ArticleTitlePitfalls and problems in the histopathologic evaluation of stereotactic needle biopsy specimens Neurosurg Clin N Am 5 19–33 Occurrence Handle8124091 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7mvFKntA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. W Feiden U Steude K Bise O Gundisch (1991) ArticleTitleAccuracy of stereotactic brain tumor biopsy: comparison of the histologic findings in biopsy cylinders and resected tumor tissue Neurosurg Rev 14 51–56 Occurrence Handle2030827 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M3jt1Onsg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S Shahzadi R Andalibi G Sharifi (2005) ArticleTitleBiopsy of thalamic lesions using computed imaging-assisted stereotaxis: report of 15 years of experience Arch Iranian Med 8 188–191

    Google Scholar 

  25. K Matsumoto S Tomita H Higashi et al. (1995) ArticleTitleImage guided stereotactic biopsy for brain tumors: experience of 71 cases No Shinkei Geka 23 897–903 Occurrence Handle7477699 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FhsFenuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehar Chand Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jain, D., Sharma, M., Sarkar, C. et al. Correlation of diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy with number of biopsy bits and site of the lesion. Brain Tumor Pathol 23, 71–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-006-0204-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-006-0204-y

Key words

Navigation