Log in

Study on the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel by picosecond laser cleaning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To study the influence of different cleaning methods on the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel surface, this paper carried out polarisation curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studied on the uncleaned, acid pickling cleaning, and picosecond laser cleaning samples. The surface morphology of the samples after electrochemical testing was detected by laser confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, and then the electrochemical corrosion behaviour of the samples in 3.5% NaCl solution was analysed under different cleaning methods. The results show that compared with the uncleaned sample, the corrosion potential of the sample after picosecond laser cleaning was relatively improved. At this time, the corrosion current density was as low as 2.29 × 10–6 A/cm2, the polarisation resistance value was as high as 18615 Ω·cm2, the impedance modulus was as high as 5.5 × 105 Ω, and the capacitance-impedance radius reached the maximum value. In conclusion, the corrosion resistance of the sample after picosecond laser cleaning was better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chail G, Kangas P (2016) Super and hyper duplex stainless steels: structures, properties and applications. Procedia Struct Integr

  2. Wan HX, Yang XJ, Liu ZY et al (2017) Pitting behavior of L415 pipeline steel in simulated leaching liquid environment. J Mater Eng Perform 26:715–722

  3. Massoud T, Maurice V, Klein LH et al (2014) Nanostructure and local properties of oxide layers grown on stainless steel in simulated pressurized water reactor environment. J Corros Sci 84:198–203

  4. Maurice V, Marcus P (2018) Current developments of nanoscale insight into corrosion protection by passive oxide films. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 22(4):156–167

  5. Ma L, Pascalidou EM, Wiame F et al (2020) Passivation mechanisms and pre-oxidation effects on model surfaces of FeCrNi austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci 167:108483

  6. Lv J, Liang T, Wang C et al (2016) Effect of in site strain on passivated property of the 316L stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng C 61:32–36

  7. Ding JH, Lei Z, Lu MX et al (2014) The electrochemical behaviour of 316L austenitic stainless steel in Cl- containing environment under different H2S partial pressures. Appl Surf Sci 289:33–41

  8. Wang Q, Chen H, Wang FS et al (2022) Laser decontamination microscopic process study on radioactive contaminations with Cs+ ion of 304 stainless steel surface. Appl Radiat Isot 182:110–112

  9. Simon A, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2013) Impact of chemical cleaning on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): the role of cleaning temperature. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44(5):713–723

  10. Agrawal A, Sahu K (2009) An overview of the recovery of acid from spent acidic solutions from steel and electroplating industries. J Hazard Mater 171:61–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu B, Wang CM, Mi GY et al (2021) Oxygen content and morphology of laser cleaned 5083 aluminum alloy and its influences on weld porosity. Opt Laser Technol 140:107031

  12. Booher LE (1988) Lead exposure in a ship overhaul facility during paint removal. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 49(3):121–127

  13. Mason TJ (2016) Ultrasonic cleaning: AN historical perspective. Ultrason Sonochem 29:519–523

  14. Sen S (2016) Grinding of magnetite using a waterjet driven cavitation cell. J Powder Technol 297:34–43

  15. Kim J, Na S (2007) Metal thin film ablation with femtosecond pulsed laser. Opt Laser Technol 39:1443–1448

  16. Cui YC, Hu JD, Liu YH et al (2008) Formation of nano-crystalline and amorphous phases on the surface of stainless steel by Nd:YAG pulsed laser irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 254:6779–6782

  17. Trtica MS, Gakovic BM (2001) Surface modification of stainless steels by TEA CO2 laser. Appl Surf Sci 177:48–57

  18. Wang AM, Feng AX, Gu XH et al (2023) Effect of picosecond laser cleaning on surface morphology and properties of stainless steel. Opt Laser Technol 159:109041

  19. Yang J, Lian JS, Bai HZ et al (2005) Cr2O3 film formed by surface oxidation of stainless steel irradiated by a Nd:YAG plulsed laser. ISIJ Int 45:730–735

  20. Psyllaki P, Oltra R (2009) Preliminary study on the laser cleaning of stainless steels after high temperature oxidation. Mater Sci Eng A 282(1):145–152

  21. **e ZX, Sun WL, Ta YH et al (2021) Experiment study on laser cleaning process and corrosion resistance of 316 stainless steel surface contaminants. J Appl Laser 41(2):235–244

  22. Švantner M, Kučera M, Smazalová E et al (2016) Thermal effects of laser marking on microstructure and corrosion properties of stainless steel. J Appl Opt 55(34):35–44

  23. Lawrence SK, Adams DP, Bahr DF et al (2016) Environmental resistance of oxide tags fabricated on 304L stainless steel via nanosecond pulsed laser irradiation. Surf Coat Technol 285:87–97

  24. Lu Y, Guan YC, Li Y et al (2020) Nanosecond laser fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on 316L stainless steel and corrosion protection application. Colloids Surf A 604:125259

  25. Liu BW, Mi GY, Wang CM et al (2021) Reoxidation process and corrosion behavior of TA15 alloy by laser ablation. Rare Metals 40(4):865–876

  26. Urech L, Lippert T, Wokaun A et al (2006) Removal of doped poly(methylmetacrylate) from tungsten and titanium substrates by femto- and nanosecond laser cleaning. Appl Surf Sci 252:4754–4758

  27. Zhao WQ, Yu ZS (2018) Self-cleaning effect in high quality percussion ablating of cooling hole by picosecond ultra-short pulse laser. Opt Lasers Eng 105:125–131

  28. Wang HM, Duan G (2003) Wear and corrosion behavior of laser clad Cr3Si reinforced intermetallic composite coatings. Intermetallics 11:755–762

  29. Zhang Y, Dong X, Wu J (2006) Corrosion behavior of sputtered Cr–Si–Ni and Cr–Si–Ni–Al resistive films in 0.1 M NaOH. Appl Surf Sci 252:2702–2710

  30. Prabhakaran S, Kulkarni A, Vasanth G et al (2018) Laser shock peening without coating induced residual stress distribution, wettability characteristics and enhanced pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel. Appl Surf Sci 428:17–30

  31. Shi YZ, Collins L, Balke N et al (2018) In-situ electrochemical-AFM study of localized corrosion of Alx CoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys in chloride solution. Appl Surf Sci 439(1):533–544

  32. Fajardo S, Bastidas DM, Criado M et al (2014) Electrochemical study on the corrosion behaviour of a new low-nickel stainless steel in carbonated alkaline solution in the presence of chlorides. Electrochim Acta 129:160–170

  33. Lukacs Z (1999) Evaluation of model and dispersion parameters and their effects on the formation of constant-phase elements in equivalent circuits. J Electroanal Chem 464:68–75

  34. Marcelin S, Pébère N, Régnier S (2013) Electrochemical characterization of a martensitic stainless steel in a neutral chloride solution. Electrochim Acta 87(1):32–40

  35. Hirschorn B, Orazem ME, Tribollet B et al (2010) Determination of effective capacitance and film thickness from constant-phase-element parameters. Electrochim Acta 55:6218–6227

  36. Fattah-Alhosseini A, Vafaeian S (2015) Comparison of electrochemical behavior between coarse-grained and fine-grained AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel by Mott-Schottky analysis and EIS measurements. J Alloys Compd 639:301–307

  37. Chen X, Li Y, Zhu Y et al (2020) Layer-by-layer corrosion behavior of 316LN stainless steel with a gradient-nanostructured surface. Electrochem Commun 110:106642

  38. Menezes MR, Godoy C, Buono VTL et al (2017) Effect of shot peening and treatment temperature on wear and corrosion resistance of sequentially plasma treated AISI 316L steel. Surf Coat Technol 309:651–662

  39. Liang J, Wang KY, Guo SM et al (2011) Influence of electrolytic plasma process on corrosion property of peened 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Lett 65(3):510–513

  40. Yang YH, Yan B, Li J et al (2011) The effect of large heat input on the microstructure and corrosion behaviour of simulated heat affected zone in 2205 duplex stainless steel. Corros Sci 53(11):3756–3763

Download references

Funding

This work is financially supported by Wenzhou University Rui’an Graduate College of Science and innovation (YC202212012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Aming Wang: writing–original draft, conceptualization, methodology, visualization, investigation. Yanming Chen: software, data curation. **nhua Gu: software, data curation. Zhihang Jiang: software, data curation. Aixin Feng: supervision, validation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aixin Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, A., Feng, A., Chen, Y. et al. Study on the corrosion resistance of 316L stainless steel by picosecond laser cleaning. J Solid State Electrochem (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05782-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-023-05782-6

Keywords

Navigation