Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to define the effectiveness of palatally positioned dental implants placed in atrophic maxillae. Searches were performed in five databases including the gray literature, up to August 2021, by 2 independent reviewers, in order to answer the following research question: Is the palatal approach technique effective in the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae? In the initial search, 1948 articles were found and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, five studies were selected, none of which was a randomized clinical trial. A total of 681 implants were placed, 549 of them with a palatal approach and 132 at the alveolar crest, with an effectiveness of 98.38% and 99.5%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. In assessing the risk of bias, only one of the studies had a low risk of bias. Implants installed with the palatal approach technique showed high effectiveness for rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla; however, few studies in the literature report this technique, requiring more controlled studies, and with less risk of bias, to confirm the results obtained in this systematic review.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10006-022-01055-0/MediaObjects/10006_2022_1055_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan MH, Holmes C (2015) Contemporary, “All-on04” concept. Dent Clin North Am 59:421–470
Cawood JI, Howell RA (1988) A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 17:232–6
Araujo RZ, Santiago Júnior JF, Cardoso CL, Condezo AFB, Moreira Júnior R, Curi MM (2019) Clinical outcomes of pterygoid implants: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 47:651–660
Cunha G, Rocha AFL, Pereira Filho VA, Gabrielli MFR, Gabrielli MAC (2018) Atrophic maxilla reconstruction with autogenous iliac graft and guided dental implants. J Craniofac Surg 29(8):2218–2219
da Hora Sales PH, Gomes MVSW, de Oliveira-Neto OB, de Lima FJC, Leão JC (2020) Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 25:e541–e548
Esfahrood ZR, Ahmadi L, Karami E, Asghari S (2017) Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(2):70
Pieri F, Caselli E, Forlivesi C, Corinaldesi G (2016) Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla using splinted short implants or sinus augmentation with standard-length implants: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31:1179–1188
Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B (2001) Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3:39–49
Penarrocha-Diago M, Bernabeu-Mira JC, Fernandez-Ruiz A, Aparicio C, Penarrocha-Oltra D (2020) Bone regeneration and soft tissue enhancement around zygomatic implants: retrospective case series. Materials (Basel) 13:1577
Mattsson T, Köndell PA, Gynther GW, Fredholm U, Bolin A (1999) Implant treatment without bone grafting in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57(3):281–287
Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A (2009) The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:712–9
Sanz-Martín I, Rojo E, Maldonado E, Stroppa G, Nart J, Sanz M (2019) Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area. Clin Oral Investig 23:957–964
Krekmanov L, Kahn M, Rangert B, Lindström H (2000) Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:405–414
Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M (2003) “All-on-Four” immediate-function concept with Brånemark System® implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5:2–9
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutronn I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 29:372
Esposito M, González-García A, Peñarrocha Diago M, Encinas RF, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Xhanari E et al (2018) Natural or palatal positioning of immediate post-extractive implants in the aesthetic zone? 1-year results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 11:189–200
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Encinas RF, Ippolito D, Xhanari E, Esposito M (2019) Natural or palatal positioning of immediate post-extractive implants in the aesthetic zone? Three-year results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 12:181–194
Schatzle M, Mannchen R, Balbach U, Hammerle CHF, Toutenburg H, Jung RE (2009) Stability Change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 20:489–95
Jung BA, Harzer W, Gedrange T, Kunkel M, Moergel M, Diedrich P et al (2010) Spectrum of indications for palatal implants in treatment concepts involving immediate and conventional loading. J Orofac Orthop 71:273–280
Candel-Marti E, Penãrrocha-Oltra D, Penãrrocha-Diago M, Penãrrocha-Diago M (2015) Satisfaction and quality of life with palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 20:e751–e756
Candel-Marti E, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Bagán L, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2015) Palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants to support fixed full-arch prostheses: controlled retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 20(3):e357
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Candel-Martí E, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Martínez-González JM, Aragoneses JM, Peñarrocha-Diago M et al (2013) Palatal positioning of implants in severely atrophic edentulous maxillae: five-year cross-sectional retrospective follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:1140–1146
Rosén A, Gynther G (2007) Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas: a long-term follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1010–1016
Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Peñarrocha M (2010) Maximum use of the anterior maxillary buttress in severe maxillary atrophy with tilted, palatally positioned implants: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:813–820
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2015) Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent 43:149–170
Bergenblock S, Andersson B, Fürst B, Jemt T (2012) Long-term follow-up of CeraOne™ single-implant restorations: an 18-year follow-up study based on a prospective patient cohort. Clin Implan Dent Rel research 14:471–479
Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, Daelemans P, Tarnow DP, Malevez C (2001) Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region. J Periodontol 72:1364–71
Coli P, Sennerby L (2019) Is peri-implant probing causing over-diagnosis and over-treatment of dental implants? J Clin Med. 8:1123
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not required.
Consent for publication
The authors of this manuscript consent to its publication in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corrêa-Silva, M., de Vicq Normande Neto, H., de Oliveira-Neto, O.B. et al. Effectiveness of palatally positioned implants in severely atrophic edentulous maxillae: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 27, 1–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01055-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01055-0