Log in

Progress in Practice: Bookends and Boilerplate I. Vigilance for the Obligations for Scholarship in Chemical Education

  • In the Classroom
  • Published:
The Chemical Educator

Abstract

Although its origins arise from confidential information, this article emerges from an area gray enough - important enough - to make the author (hereafter: I) comfortable with the context and sufficiently cautious to clear the content with the National Science Foundation. Intrigued? Let me explain. My premise is that the way that grant proposals are written is representative of the way that a group of potentially leading-edge scholars

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to BRIAN P. COPPOLA.

About this article

Cite this article

COPPOLA, B.P. Progress in Practice: Bookends and Boilerplate I. Vigilance for the Obligations for Scholarship in Chemical Education. Chem. Educator 2, 1–7 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970128a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970128a

Navigation