Abstract
Although its origins arise from confidential information, this article emerges from an area gray enough - important enough - to make the author (hereafter: I) comfortable with the context and sufficiently cautious to clear the content with the National Science Foundation. Intrigued? Let me explain. My premise is that the way that grant proposals are written is representative of the way that a group of potentially leading-edge scholars
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
COPPOLA, B.P. Progress in Practice: Bookends and Boilerplate I. Vigilance for the Obligations for Scholarship in Chemical Education. Chem. Educator 2, 1–7 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970128a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970128a