Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of different final irrigation activation methods in removing debris and smear layer in the apical, middle, and coronal portion of straight root canals.
Material and methods
Straight root canals of 58 freshly extracted mandibular premolars were used. Root canals were prepared to size 40.06. Irrigation was performed using 3% sodium hypochlorite. Samples were divided into four equal groups (n = 12) according to the irrigation activation techniques: (A) manual irrigation (MI), (B) EndoActivator (EA) (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), (C) sonic activation EDDY (EDDY; VDW, Munich, Germany), and (D) passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Ten teeth served as negative controls. Roots were split longitudinally, and the canal walls were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. The presence of debris and smear layer at coronal, middle, and apical levels were evaluated using a 5-point scoring system and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.
Results
Canal cleanliness decreased from coronal to apical (P = 0.035). Significantly more debris was removed with EA, EDDY, and PUI compared to MI (P < 0.001; total values), but no differences were observed in the different portions of the root canals (P > 0.05). Smear layer removal with PUI, EA, and EDDY was not significantly different (P > 0.05), but only EDDY and PUI were superior to MI (P < 0.01).
Conclusion
All activation methods created nearly debris-free canal walls and were superior compared to manual irrigation (P < 0.001). EDDY and PUI also showed significantly better smear layer scores compared to manual irrigation.
Clinical relevance
The sonic activation system EDDY performed equally as well as PUI, and both methods were significantly superior compared with manual irrigation in straight root canals with regard to debris and smear layer removal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH (2005) Mechanical preparation of root canals: sha** goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 10:30–76
McComb D, Smith DC (1975) A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1:238–242
Gulabivala K, Patel B, Evans G, Ng YL (2005) Effects of mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces. Endod Top 10:103–122
Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E (2009) Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a computational fluid dynamics study. Int Endod J 42:144–155
Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, Wimmer C, Susin L, Zhang K, Arun SN, Kim J, Looney SW, Pashley DH (2010) Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 36:745–750
Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35:791–804
Plotino G, Cortese T, Grande NM, Leonardi DP, Di Giorgio G, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2016) New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz Dent J 27:3–8
Violich DR, Chandler NP (2010) The smear layer in endodontics—a review. Int Endod J 43:2–15
Al-Ali M, Sathorn C, Parashos P (2012) Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Int Endod J 45:898–906
Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E (2012) Sha** ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 45:449–461
Schmidt TF, Teixeira CS, Felippe MCS, Felippe WT, Pashley DH, Bortoluzzi EA (2015) Effect of ultrasonic activation or irrigants on smear layer removal. J Endod 41:1359–1363
Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK (2002) Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94:658–666
Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y (2014) Irrigation in endodontics. Brit Dent J 216:299–303
Bertacci A, Baroni C, Breschi L, Venturi M, Prati C (2007) The influence of smear layer in lateral channels filling. Clin Oral Investig 11:353–359
Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32:389–398
Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M (2004) Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:381–387
van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 40:415–426
Jensen SA, Walker TL, Hutter JW, Nicoll BK (1999) Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 25:735–738
Hülsmann M, Rümmelin C, Schäfers F (1997) Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation. J Endod 23:301–306
Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA (2009) Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 35:1056–1059
Paqué F, Al-Jadaa A, Kfir A (2012) Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Int Endod J 45:413–418
Haikel Y, Allemann C (1988) Effectiveness of four methods for preparing root canals: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation. J Endod 14:340–345
Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton JW (2009) Ultrastructural examination of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 35:1303–1309
American Association of Endodontists (2003) Glossary of endodontic terms. AAE, Chicago, IL, USA
Grandini S, Balleri P, Ferrari M (2002) Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant. J Endod 28:300–303
West JD, Roane JB, Goerig AC (1994) Cleaning and sha** the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC (eds) Pathways of the pulps, 6th edn. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis, pp 179–218
Shahravan A, Haghdoost AA, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F (2007) Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 33:96–105
Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T (2006) Comparative study on the sha** ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and sha** ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 39:203–212
Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M (2009) Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J 42:335–343
Lee SJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2004) The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 37:672–678
van der Sluis LWM, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2005) The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper. Int Endod J 38:764–768
de Gregorio C, Arias A, Navarette N, Del Rio V, Oltra E, Cohenca N (2013) Effect of apical size and taper on the volume of irrigant delivered at working length with apical pressure at different root curvatures. J Endod 39:119–124
Li D, Jiang S, Yin X, Chang JW, Ke J, Zhang C (2015) Efficacy of needle, ultrasonic, and Endoactivator irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming in removing calcium hydroxide from the main canal and isthmus: an in vitro micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy study. Photomed Laser Surg 33:330–337
Fornari VJ, Silva-Sousa YT, Vanni JR, Pécora JD, Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD (2010) Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals. Int Endod J 43:988–994
Klyn SL, Kirkpatrick TC, Rutledge RE (2010) In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 36:1367–1371
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
None.
Ethical approval
This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Urban, K., Donnermeyer, D., Schäfer, E. et al. Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation. Clin Oral Invest 21, 2681–2687 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x