Log in

Endovaskuläre Versorgung von Pathologien der Aorta ascendens und des Aortenbogens

Endovascular treatment of ascending aorta and aortic arch pathologies

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die offene Operation stellt aktuell den „Goldstandard“ für die Versorgung der Aorta ascendens und des Aortenbogens dar. Die konventionellen Operationstechniken erfordern allerdings einen hypothermen Kreislaufstillstand, der mit relevanten Komplikationen assoziiert ist. Die minimalinvasive Therapie von pathologischen Veränderungen des Aortenbogens bedeutet aufgrund der komplexen Probleme dieser vaskulären Region eine technische Herausforderung. Die aus dem Aortenbogen abgehenden Abzweigungen versorgen u. a. das Gehirn, das eine minimale Ischämietoleranz hat. Weiterhin ist der Aortenbogen weit, gebogen, stärker pulsatil und weiter von den Femoralarterien entfernt.

Ergebnisse

Die endovaskulären Therapieoptionen zur Behandlung von pathologischen Veränderungen der Aorta ascendens und des Aortenbogens sind Hybridtechniken im Aortenbogen, Chimney-Prozeduren für die supraaortalen Äste, In-situ-Fenestration von thorakalen Stent-Prothesen sowie individuell angefertigte fenestrierte und gebranchte Stent-Prothesen. Individuell angefertigte fenestrierte und gebranchte Stent-Prothesen sind eine sehr gute Option für Patienten, die für offene Operation nicht geeignet sind, und könnten in der Zukunft die endovaskuäre Therapie der Wahl werden.

Schlussfolgerung

Eine gute präoperative Planung, die exakte Kenntnis der individuellen anatomischen Verhältnisse sowie das Verständnis der Besonderheiten der Aorta ascendens und des Aortenbogens sind für die erfolgreiche endovaskuläre Versorgung entscheidend.

Abstract

Background

Open surgery for pathologies of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch represents the gold standard of treatment. Conventional open repair techniques, however, require hypothermic circulatory arrest which is associated with relevant complications. Minimally invasive therapy of the aortic arch represents an alternative for patients not suitable for open therapy; however, it is a challenge due to the complexity of this vascular region. The supra-aortic branches perfuse the brain which has a minimal tolerance to ischemia time. Furthermore, the aortic arch may be wide, angulated, more pulsatile and at a greater distance from the femoral access vessels than the rest of the aorta.

Results

Endovascular options for treatment of pathologies of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch include hybrid debranching procedures, chimney grafts for the supra-aortic vessels, in situ fenestration of thoracic endografts and customized fenestrated branched stent grafts. Customized fenestrated branched endografts appear to be a very good option for patients unfit for open surgery and could potentially become the endovascular treatment of choice.

Conclusion

Irrespective of the endovascular treatment selected, detailed preoperative planning and understanding of the specific characteristics of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch are of paramount importance to achieve a good outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Ahanchi SS, Almaroof B, Stout CL et al (2012) In situ laser fenestration for revascularization of the left subclavian artery during emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther 19:226–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou GA, Mireskandari M, Bicknell CD et al (2010) Hybrid repair of the aortic arch in patients with extensive aortic disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40:715–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiesa R, Melissano G, Tshomba Y et al (2010) Ten years of endovascular aortic arch repair. J Endovasc Ther 17:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chuter TA, Schneider DB (2007) Endovascular repair of the aortic arch. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 19:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuter TA, Schneider DB, Reilly LM et al (2003) Modular branched stent graft for endovascular repair of aortic arch aneurysm and dissection. J Vasc Surg 38:859–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haulon S, Greenberg RK, Spear R et al (2014) Global experience with an inner branched arch endograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.072

  7. Jaussaud N, Chitsaz S, Meadows A et al (2013) Acute type A aortic dissection intimal tears by 64-slice computed tomography: a role for endovascular stent-grafting? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 54:373–381

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kilic A, Tang R, Whitson BA et al (2013) Outcomes in the current surgical era following operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly: a single-institutional experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 17:104–109

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kölbel T, Reiter B, Schirmer J et al (2013) Customized transapical thoracic endovascular repair for acute type A dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 95:694–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kölbel T, Rostock T, Larena-Avellaneda A et al (2010) An externalized transseptal guidewire technique to facilitate guidewire stabilization and stent-graft passage in the aortic arch. J Endovasc Ther 17:744–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolvenbach RR, Karmeli R, Pinter LS et al (2011) Endovascular management of ascending aortic pathology. J Vasc Surg 53:1431–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kotelis D, Geisbusch P, Attigah N et al (2011) Total vs hemi-aortic arch transposition for hybrid aortic arch repair. J Vasc Surg 54:1182–1186 e1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mangialardi N, Serrao E, Kasemi H et al. (2014) Chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies: an 11-year single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther 21:312–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumura JS, Melissano G, Cambria RP et al (2014) Five-year results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the Zenith TX2. J Vasc Surg 60(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Metcalfe MJ, Karthikesalingam A, Black SA et al (2012) The first endovascular repair of an acute type A dissection using an endograft designed for the ascending aorta. J Vasc Surg 55:220–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Minakawa M, Fukuda I, Yamauchi S et al (2010) Early and long-term outcome of total arch replacement using selective cerebral perfusion. Ann Thorac Surg 90:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moulakakis KG, Mylonas SN, Dalainas I et al (2013) The chimney-graft technique for preserving supra-aortic branches: a review. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:339–346

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy EH, Dimaio JM, Dean W et al (2009) Endovascular repair of acute traumatic thoracic aortic transection with laser-assisted in-situ fenestration of a stent-graft covering the left subclavian artery. J Endovasc Ther 16:457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Morgan R et al (2012) Progress in endovascular management of type A dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 44:406–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okada T, Shimamoto M, Yamazaki F et al (2012) Insights of stroke in aortic arch surgery: identification of significant risk factors and surgical implication. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:268–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Redlinger RE Jr, Ahanchi SS, Panneton JM (2013) In situ laser fenestration during emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair is an effective method for left subclavian artery revascularization. J Vasc Surg 58:1171–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riga CV, Bicknell CD, Basra M et al (2013) In vitro fenestration of aortic stent-grafts: implications of puncture methods for in situ fenestration durability. J Endovasc Ther 20:536–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosset E, Ben Ahmed S, Galvaing G et al (2014) Editor’s choice – hybrid treatment of thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47:470–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiono M, Hata M, Sezai A et al (2006) Emergency surgery for acute type a aortic dissection in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg 82:554–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundt TM 3rd, Orszulak TA, Cook DJ, Schaff HV (2008) Improving results of open arch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 86:787–796 (discussion 787–796)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tian DH, Wan B, Di Eusanio M et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and efficacy of the frozen elephant trunk technique in aortic arch surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:581–591

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsilimparis N, Debus ES, Wipper S et al (2014) PS20: fenestrated and branched aortic arch endografts for patients unfit for open surgery. In: Vascular Annual Meeting 2014. Boston, USA

  28. Tsilimparis N, Debus ES, Wipper S et al (2014) Proximal thoracic endograft displacement rescued by balloon-assisted pull-back, external shunting and in-situ fenestration for the left carotid artery. J Vasc Surg (Im Druck)

  29. Weiss G, Tsagakis K, Jakob H et al (2014) The frozen elephant trunk technique for the treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection with involvement of the aortic arch: multicentre early experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

  30. Wipper S, Lohrenz C, Ahlbrecht O et al (2013) Antegrade side branch access in branched aortic arch endografts: a porcine feasibility study. J Endovasc Ther 20:233–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wipper S, Lohrenz C, Peymann K et al (2012) Hemodynamic impact of transseptal access to the ascending aorta in a porcine model. J Endovasc Ther 19:679–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yeh YH, Su YJ, Liu CH (2013) Acute aortic dissection (AAD) in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 57:78–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. N. Tsilimparis: Kongressreiseunterstützung von Cook Medical, E.S. Debus: keine, S.W. Carpenter: keine, S. Wipper: keine, H. Diener: keine, A. Larena-Avellaneda: keine, T. Kölbel: Patentrechte für Fa. Cook Medical. Der Beitrag enthält keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Tsilimparis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsilimparis, N., Debus, E., Wipper, S. et al. Endovaskuläre Versorgung von Pathologien der Aorta ascendens und des Aortenbogens. Gefässchirurgie 19, 436–442 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1338-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-014-1338-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation