Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Microchimica Acta
The published version of this article, unfortunately, contains error. Corrections in Figs. 1, 3 and 5 were incorrectly carried out. Given in this article are the correct figures.
a Experimental set up of an Fe3O4-graphene FPI for NH3 sensing (sensing material is coated at the end of the fiber tip). b Dip wavelength shift of graphene coated FPI and Fe3O4-graphene coated FPI with NH3 concentration ranging from 1.5-150 ppm. c. Time response curve of graphene coated FPI and Fe3O4-graphene coated FPI with NH3 concentration from 1.5-150 ppm. d Cross-sensitivity study of graphene coated FPI and Fe3O4-graphene coated FPI at 150 ppm NH3 gas. e FESEM image of nano-carbon. f Spectral response of nano-carbon coated FPI with NH3 sensing concentration ranging from 3-3000 ppm. g Response function characteristics of nano-carbon FPI in terms of wavelength shift with NH3 concentration from 3-3000 ppm at 60 secs, 120 secs, and 180 secs respectively. h Time response curve of nanocarbon FPI at different ppm levels for nano-carbon. Reprinted with permission from [103, 116]. Copyright of Royal Society of Chemistry
a Coating process of PAA-CNTs/PAH nanofilms and cryptophane -A-6Me layer on to the inner surface of PCF cladding air holes. b Simulation model of PCF-LPG with sensing film coated on to the cladding air holes and its cladding mode LP11 in plane A and plane E. c Dip wavelength shift with respect to change in CH4 concentration from 0%-3.5%. d Sensor time response graph for 210 nm thickness film for exposure of 1.5% CH4 concentration. Reprint with permission from Ref. [176]. Copyright of The Optical Society
a Sketch of rGO coated side polished optical fiber sensing probe with its cross section and its SEM images. b Optical power variation of rGO coated side polished optical fiber sensor with varied toluene concentration from 40 to 196 ppm. c Optical power variation of rGO coated side polished optical fiber sensor as a function of time with toluene concentration of 196 ppm. d Schematic diagram of the process for the fabrication of the U-bent SPR sensor. e Response of SPR spectrum of coated graphene/AgNPs U-bent sensor with different concentrations of aqueous ethanol. f Shift of the SPR sensor coated with graphene/AgNPs and PVA/AgNPs with different concentrations of aqueous ethanol. g Time response curve of graphene/AgNPs SPR sensor for aqueous ethanol concentration of 50%. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [85, 190]. Copyright of The Optical Society and Elsevier
The original article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3351-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pawar, D., Kale, S.N. Correction to: A review on nanomaterial-modified optical fiber sensors for gases, vapors and ions. Microchim Acta 186, 292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3383-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3383-z