Log in

Fracture displacement of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries: Which measurement methods are reliable and does displacement correlate with adverse events?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 04 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the interobserver reliability of perceived displacement (PD) ≥ 1 cm of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures and to determine if PD correlated with published methods of measuring fracture displacement and adverse events.

Methods

The injury and follow-up radiographs of 10 patients with nonoperative minimally displaced LC1 injuries were reviewed by 27 orthopaedic trauma surgeons to determine if they perceived an interval fracture displacement ≥ 1 cm. Perceived displacement (PD) was compared to 11 measurements of displacement: the difference in heights of iliac crests (IC), sourcils, and ischial tuberosities on AP/outlet radiographs; the distance from femoral head (FH) to the sacral midline and the distance between the radiographic teardrops (TD) on the AP; the distance from the TD to sacral midline and the difference in distances between the SI joints and the contralateral TD on the inlet. The interobserver reliability and correlation of PD and measured displacement was calculated. The association between PD and adverse events was also evaluated.

Results

PD had weak interobserver reliability (kappa = 0.46). Many of the measurements of displacement were poorly sensitive for PD. The magnification-corrected AP TD measurement had the highest sensitivity (100%) for PD and excellent interobserver reliability (Intraclass correlation 0.97), but had a low specificity (57.1%). All three patients with PD had adverse events while patients without PD had uneventful recoveries (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The AP TD measurement detected all cases of PD and had excellent reliability. PD was associated with adverse events, suggesting that accurate and reliable measurements of displacement are warranted.

Level of evidence III

Diagnostic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Kuršumović K, Hadeed M, Bassett J et al (2021) Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries: a spectrum of fracture types and treatment algorithms. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:841–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-021-02935-Z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sembler Soles GL, Lien J, Tornetta P (2012) Nonoperative immediate weightbearing of minimally displaced lateral compression sacral fractures does not result in displacement. J Orthop Trauma 69:563–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeKeyser GJ, Kellam PJ, Haller JM et al (2022) Emergency department stress radiographs of lateral compression type-1 pelvic ring injuries are safe, effective, and reliable. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104:336–344. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.00737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sagi HC, Coniglione FM, Stanford JH (2011) Examination under anesthetic for occult pelvic ring instability. J Orthop Trauma 25:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parry JA, Salameh M, Maher MH et al (2020) The lateral stress radiograph identifies occult instability of lateral compression pelvic ring injuries without sedation. J Orthop Trauma 34:567–571. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson LA, Waddell JP, Leighton RK et al (1987) Anterior approach and stabilization of the disrupted sacroiliac joint. J Trauma 27:1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198712000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH, Halpenny J (1990) Long-term pain and disability in relation to residual deformity after displaced pelvic ring fractures. Can J Surg 33:492–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruce B, Reilly M, Sims S (2011) OTA highlight paper predicting future displacement of nonoperatively managed lateral compression sacral fractures: can it be done? J Orthop Trauma 25:523–527. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f8be33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lefaivre KA, Blachut PA, Starr AJ et al (2014) Radiographic displacement in pelvic ring disruption: reliability of 3 previously described measurement techniques. J Orthop Trauma 28:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829efcc5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nystrom LM, McKinley TO, Marsh JL (2013) Accuracy in radiographic assessment of pelvic ring fracture deformity: analysis of current methods. J Orthop Trauma 27:708–715. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318298e6cf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parry JA, Hadeed MM, Strage KE et al (2022) Lateral stress radiographs (LSR) of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic injuries, with the injured-side down or up, reliably measures occult instability. J Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs R, Kleweno C, Wallace S et al (2021) Validation of relative motion measurement method of lateral compression pelvic fractures during examination under anesthesia. J Orthop Trauma 35:e289–e292. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tucker NJ, Heare A, Stacey SC et al (2022) The lateral stress radiograph: an effective alternative to examination under anesthesia for identifying occult instability in minimally displaced lateral compression pelvic ring injuries. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03373-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22:276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagen J, Castillo R, Dubina A et al (2016) Does surgical stabilization of lateral compression-type pelvic ring fractures decrease patients’ pain, reduce narcotic use, and improve mobilization? Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:1422–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4525-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slobogean GP, Gaski GE, Nascone J et al (2021) A prospective clinical trial comparing surgical fixation versus nonoperative management of minimally displaced complete lateral compression pelvis fractures. J Orthop Trauma 35:592–598. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tucker NJ, Scott BL, Heare A et al (2023) Early outcomes of operative versus nonoperative management of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 10:1097

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tucker NJ, Scott BL, Heare A et al (2023) Operative management of stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries: analysis of outcomes before and after implementation of a departmental stress protocol. J Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tucker NJ, Mauffrey C, Parry JA (2022) Unstable minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries have a similar hospital course as intertrochanteric femur fractures. Injury 53:481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadeed MM, Tucker NJ, Heare A, Mauffrey C, Parry JA (2022) Rami comminution is associated with displacement of minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 injuries on lateral stress radiographs. J Orthop Trauma 36(10):489–493. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002403. (PMID: 35575625)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Orthopaedic Trauma Research (OTR) Group: Augustine Saiz, Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA; Chris Lee, Department of Orthopaedics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Graham DeKeyser, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; John Morellato, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA; Joseph Patterson, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Joshua Alan Parry, MD, MSc, Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; Justin Haller, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Lucas Marchand, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Matthew Wharton, Department of Orthopaedics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Nicholas Tucker, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; Patrick Kellam, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Stephen Shymon, Department of Orthopaedics, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Stephen Warner, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas at Houston Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Yejoon Kim, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; Zachary Working, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oregon Health Science Center, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Contributions

All authors made contributions to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it, and gave final approval of the submitted version.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have financial conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Orthopaedic Trauma Research (OTR) Group details given in Acknowledgments section.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

The Orthopaedic Trauma Research (OTR) Group. Fracture displacement of lateral compression type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries: Which measurement methods are reliable and does displacement correlate with adverse events?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03776-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03776-8

Keywords

Navigation