SpringerLink
Log in

Combined nail-plate constructs in the management of osteoporotic native distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the available evidence

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Distal femoral fractures account for 4–6% of fragility fractures. These may be managed using a combined nail-plate construct (NPC). The use of NPCs is gaining traction. Whilst several theoretical advantages exist, there is little evidence reporting on binary or patient-reported outcomes.

The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature pertaining to NPCs and their treatment of native distal femoral fractures, appraising the outcomes and focusing on the rationale for their increasing uptake in recent literature.

Methods

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Clinical Key, PubMed and Cochrane library was performed from date of inception up to in August 9, 2022. All study languages were included initially. A further Google Scholar search review was performed to identify any other studies not identified in the database interrogation.

Studies were eligible if they reported on the use of nail-plate constructs in managing distal femoral fractures. Any outcome metric was permitted.

The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for non-randomised Studies tool.

Quantitative analysis was performed using a log odds ratio random effects model. The Knapp–Hartung adjustment was utilised if the total number of included studies was < 5. Study effect sizes and appropriate plots were constructed to illustrate the outcomes data.

Results

A total of four studies were eligible for inclusion. Study data was extracted and summarised with their relevant outcomes presented. The literature review demonstrated that the use of NPCs led to significantly earlier full weight bearing (p < 0.001) and had reduced non-union rates over a single construct, without affecting infection rates (12.5% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.289) and significantly lower implant failure rates (10.5% vs. 0%; p = 0.011). A meta-analysis is performed of available studies and Forrest plots presented.

Conclusion

The use of NPC in the management of native osteoporotic DFFs is gaining traction but the available evidence is of low grade with significant heterogeneity in small cohorts of patients. We suggest that a large-scale, multicentre prospective study should be performed, with agreed functional and radiological outcome metrics, to provide a more robust evidence base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canton G, Giraldi G, Dussi M, Ratti C, Murena L (2019) Osteoporotic distal femur fractures in the elderly: Peculiarities and treatment strategies. Acta Biomed 90(12):25–32

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ, FredericksCrichlow PDRJ, Maar DC et al (2018) Patient mortality in geriatric distal femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32(3):111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Court-Brown CM (2006) Caesar B epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieder CM, Gaski GE, Virkus WW, Kempton LB (2021) Is immediate weight-bearing safe after single implant fixation of elderly distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 35(1):49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubiak EN, Beebe MJ, North K, Hitchcock R, Potter MQ (2013) Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(12):727–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ariza-Vega P, Jiminez-Moleon JJ, Kristensen MT (2014) Non weight-bearing status compromises the functional level up to 1 year after hip fracture surgery. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 93(8):641–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warren J, Sundaram K, Anis H et al (2019) The association between weight-bearing status and early complications in hip fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(7):1419–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson C, Bretherton CP, Raza M, Zargaran A, Eardley WG, Trompeter AJ, Collaborators FFPOM (2022) The fragility fracture postoperative mobilisation multicentre audit the reality of weightbearing practices following operations for lower limb fragility fractures. The Bone Joint Journal. 104(8):972–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Luefkens HG, Cooper C (2001) Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone 29(6):517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ (2011) Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1188–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tahami M, Vaziri AS, Tahmesabi MN, Vosoughi F, Khalilizad M, Shakiba S (2022) Pesantez RF Practical approach to the native distal femur fractures in the elderly: A rapid review over the recent trends. Injury 53:2389–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JRA, Halliday R, Aquilina AL, Morrison RJM, Yip CK, McArthur J et al (2015) Distal femoral fractures: The need to review the standard of care. Injury 46(6):1084–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F (2013) Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith TO, Hedges C, MacNair R, Schankat K, Wimhurst JA (2009) The clinical and radiological outcomes of the LISS plate for distal femoral fracture a systematic review. Injury 40(10):1049–1063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG for the PRISMA Group (2009): Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement BMJ;39:b2535

  16. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Röver C, Knapp G, Friede T (2015) Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 1:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0091-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garala K, Ramoutar D, Li J, Syed F, Arastu M, Ward J, Patil S (2022) Distal femoral fracture: a comparison between single lateral plate fixation and a combined femoral nail and plate fixation. Injury 53:634–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spitler CA, Bergin PF, Russell GV, Graves ML (2018) Endosteal substitution with an intramedullary rod in fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 32:S25–S29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Passias BJ, Emmer TC, Sullivan BD, Gupta A, Myers D, Skura BW, Taylor BC (2021) Treatment of distal femur fractures with a combined nail-pate construct: Techniques and outcomes. J Long term Eff Med Implants 31(3):15–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liporace FA, Yoon RS (2019) Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33:e64–e68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon RS, Patel JN, Liporace FA (2019) Nail and Plate Combination Fixation for Periprosthetic and Interprosthetic Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33(6):S18–S20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mueller MGE (2019) Nail plate constructs for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Knee Surg 32(5):403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Egol KA, Delsole E, Mandel J, Konda S (2019) Repair of distal femoral periprosthetic nonunion: linked nail plate construct. J Orthop Trauma 33:S30–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussain MS, Dailey SK, Avilucea FR (2018) Stable fixation and immediate weight-bearing after combined retrograde intramedullary nailing and open reduction internal fixation of noncomminuted distal interprosthetic femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32(6):e237–e240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanabur P, Sandilands SM, Whitmer KK, Owen TM, Coniglione FM, Shuler TE (2017) Nail and locking plate for peri-prosthetic fractures. J Orthop Trauma 31(12):e425–e431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Attum B, Douleh D, Whiting PS et al (2017) Outcomes of distal femur non unions treated with a combined nail/plate construct and autogenous bone grafting. J Orthop Trauma 31(9):e301-304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bezwada HP et al (2004) Periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(4):453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun ZH, Liu YJ, Li H (2014) Femoral stress and strain changes post-jip, -knee and -ipsilateral hip/knee arthroplasties: a finite element analysis. Orthop Surg 6:137–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shawen SB, Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Topoleski T, Xenos JS, Orchowski JR (2003) Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis. JBJS Am 1:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zalzal P, Backstein D, Gross AE, Papini M (2006) Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty: characteristics that increase local stresses. J Arthroplasty 21(5):737–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoffel K, Sommer C, Lee M, Zhu TY, Schweiger K, Finkemeier C (2022) Double fixation for complex distal femoral fracture EFORT. Open Rev 7:274–286

    Google Scholar 

  33. Auston D, Donohue D, Stoops K et al (2018) Long segment blocking screws increases the stability of retrograde nail fixation in geriatric supracondylar femur fractures: Eliminating the bell-clapper effect. J Orthop Trauma 32:559–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwak DK, Oh SH, Lee SJ, Lee SH, Lee YM, Yoo JH (2022) Effect of the additional anteroposterior blocking screw on nail/medullary canal mismatch after cephalomedullary nailing in unstable pertrochanteric fracture. A Finite Element Analysis Bone Joint Res 11(3):152–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sala C, Mercer D, DeCoster TA et al (2011) Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation Part a: Experimental investigation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 14:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sala C, Mercer D, DeCoster TA et al (2011) Experimental and probabilistic analysis of distal femoral periprosthetic fracture: a comparison of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixation Part a: Experimental investigation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 14:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wright DJ, DeSanto DJ, McGarry MH, Lee TQ, Scolaro JA (2020) Supplemental fixation of supracondylar distal femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparison of dual-plates and plate-nail constructs. J Orthop Trauma 34:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Başcı O, Karakaşlı A, Kumtepe E, Güran O, Havıtçıoğlu H (2015) Combination of anatomical locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail in distal femoral fractures: comparison of mechanical stability. Joint Dis Related Surg. 26(1):021–026

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fontenot PB, Diaz M, Stoops K, Barrick B, Santoni B, Mir H (2019) Supplementation of lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 33:642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R (2018) Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 42:2675–2683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Neradi D, Sodavarapu P, **dal K, Kumar D, Kumar V (2022) Locked plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing for distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg 10(2):141–152

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoon BH, Park IK, Kim Y, Oh HK, Choo SK, Sung YB (2021) Incidence of non union after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:225–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dunbar RP, Egol KA, Jones CB, Ertl JP, Mullis B, Perez E, Collinge CA, Ostrum R, Humphrey C, Gardner MJ, Ricci WM (2022) Locked lateral plating vs. retrograde nailing for distal femur fractures: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Orthop Trauma 17:10–97

    Google Scholar 

  44. Salazar B, Babian AR, DeBaun MR, Githens MF, Chavez GA, Goodnough LH, Gardner MJ, Bishop JA (2021) Distal femur replacement versus surgical fixation for the treatment of geriatric distal femur fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 35(1):2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Maloney G, Pan T, van Eck CF, Patel D, Tarkin I (2016) Geriatric distal femur fracture: are we underestimating the rate of local and systemic complications? Injury 47(8):1732–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vemulapalli KC, Pechero GR, Warner SJ, Achor TS, Gary JL, Munz JW et al (2022) Is retrograde nailing superior to lateral locked plating foe complete articular distal femoral fractures? Injury 53(2):640–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Claireaux HA, Searle HK, Parsons NR, Griffin XL (2022) Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults Cochrane database. Syst Rev 10(10):CD010606

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ryan R (2016) Cochrane consumers and communication review group: meta-analysis (Dec 2016) (available online at https://cccrg.cochrane.org/sites/cccrg.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/meta-analysis_revised_december_1st_1_2016.pdf

  49. Lee C, Brodke D, O’Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C et al (2023) Risk factors for reoperation to promote union in 1111 distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 37(4):168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Scott JW (2001) Scott’s parabola. BMJ 323(7327):1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding source to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK

    Adam Tucker

  2. Musgrave Park Hospital, Stockmans Lane, Belfast, BT9 7JB, UK

    Robert Espey

  3. Ulster Hospital Dundonald, Upper Newtownards Road, Belfast, BT16 1RH, UK

    Lewis Stevenson

Authors
  1. Robert Espey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lewis Stevenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RE was involved in methodology, literature review, drafting of manuscript. LS helped in drafting/editing of manuscript. AT contributed to conceptualisation, literature review, study supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Tucker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing personal, professional of financial conflicts of interest.

Consent to participate

Consent to participate from patients was not required for the purposes of a systematic review/meta-analysis study.

Consent to publish

Consent to publish is provided by the above-mentioned authors who have all contributed to the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 757 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Espey, R., Stevenson, L. & Tucker, A. Combined nail-plate constructs in the management of osteoporotic native distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the available evidence. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 3215–3223 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03552-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03552-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation