Log in

Preliminary comparison of primary and conversion surgery with magnetically controlled growing rods in children with early onset scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Non-invasive distraction of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) avoids repeated surgical lengthening in patients with early onset scoliosis, but it is not known how effective this technique is in previously operated children.

Methods

In a retrospective, multicentre study, the data were obtained for 27 primary (P) patients [mean age 7.0 (2.4–10.7) years at surgery] and 23 conversion (C) patients [mean age 7.7 (3.6–11.0) years at conversion from standard growing rods] with 1-year follow-up.

Results

The mean major curve was 63.9° in the P group and 46.5° in the C group at baseline (preoperatively, p = 0.0009) and 39.5° and 39.6°, respectively, at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.99). The mean percentage change of spinal growth from baseline to 1-year follow-up was 18.3 % in the P group and 6.5 % in the C group (p = 0.007). Comparing the spinal growth from postoperative to 1-year follow-up no statistical difference was observed between the study groups (1.8 % P vs −2.2 % C, p = 0.09).

Conclusions

Scoliosis can be equally controlled after conversion from traditional growing rods into MCGR, but spinal growth from baseline is less in the conversion patients as compared with the primary group.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ et al (2014) Development and initial validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 96:1359–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbarnia BA (2007) Management themes in early onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89-A(Suppl 1):42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandes P, Weinstein SL (2007) Natural history of early onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89-A:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pehrsson K, Larsson S, Oden A, Nachemson A (1992) Long-term follow-up of patients with untreated scoliosis. A study of mortality, causes of death, and symptoms. Spine 17:1091–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karol LA, Johnston C, Mladenov K et al (2008) Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90-A:1272–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for 3–11 years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine 33:984–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy RE, Luhmann S, Lenke L, McCullough FL (2014) The Shilla growth guidance technique for early-onset spinal deformities at 2-year follow-up: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 34:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lenke LG, Dobbs MB (2007) Management of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 89-A(Suppl. 1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasler CC, Mehrkens A, Hefti F (2010) Efficacy and safety of VEPTR instrumentation for progressive spine deformities in young children without rib fusions. Eur Spine J 19:400–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy RF, Moisan A, Kelly DM et al (2016) Use of Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) in the treatment of congenital scoliosis without fused ribs. J Pediatr Orthop 36(4):329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dannawi Z, Altaf F, Harshavardhana NS et al (2013) Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early-onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J 95-B:75–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung KM, Cheung JP, Samartzis D et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379:1967–1974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hickey BA, Towriss C, Baxter G et al (2014) Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23:61–65

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sankar WN, Skaggs DL, Yazici M et al (2011) Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 36:806–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell RM Jr, Smith MD, Mayes TC et al (2003) The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:399–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akbarnia BA, Cheung K, Noordeen H et al (2013) Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J et al (2013) Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg 95-A:1745–1750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rolton D, Richards J, Nnadi C (2014) Magnetic controlled growth rods versus conventional growing rod systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a cost comparison. Eur Spine J 24(7):1457–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kabirian N, Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB et al (2014) Deep surgical site infection following 2344 growing-rod procedures for early-onset scoliosis: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96-A:e128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S et al (2014) Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine 39:1196–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noordeen HM, Shah SA, Elsebaie HB et al (2011) In vivo distraction force and length measurements of growing rods: which factors influence the ability to lengthen? Spine 36:2299–2303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Leslee Willes, MS, Willes Consulting Group, Incorporated for assistance with statistical analysis. We are Grateful to Mr. MH Hilali Noordeen, MA, DM, FRCS (Tr and Orth), MCh—Consultant spinal surgeon based at The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stan and University College of London, England—United Kingdom without whose guidance, we would not have been able to prepare this manuscript for publication in its current form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilkka Helenius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keskinen, H., Helenius, I., Nnadi, C. et al. Preliminary comparison of primary and conversion surgery with magnetically controlled growing rods in children with early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25, 3294–3300 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4597-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4597-y

Keywords

Navigation