Abstract
The ability of plants to take up phosphorus (P) from soil depends on root morphology and root exudates release and can be modulated by beneficial soil microbes. These microbes can solubilize P, affect root elongation and branching, and lead to a higher uptake of P and other nutrients. However, coordination of these mechanisms is unclear, especially the mechanism for changing the available form of P. We aimed to dissect the effects of two different beneficial microbial taxa (plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)) on root morphological traits, plant nutrient content, and growth in tomato and corn fertilized with either Gafsa rock phosphate (RP) or triple superphosphate (TSP), which have contrasting solubility levels. Tomato and corn were grown in pots and inoculated with one of three PGPB species or a mix of two AMF species or were not inoculated. Root traits, botanical fractions, and the contents of various mineral nutrients were measured. TSP stimulated tomato biomass accumulation compared to RP but did not stimulate corn biomass accumulation. PGPB improved the growth of both plant species under RP, with limited differences among the strains, whereas AMF only improved tomato growth under TSP. These differences between microbial systems were explained by a bacterial effect on the total root length but not on the mean root diameter and by the ability of AMF to improve the mineral nutrient content. The effects of PGPB were less dependent on the plant species and on P form than the effects of AMF.These results have implications for the improvement of the early plant growth through the management of beneficial microbes.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00572-019-00927-w/MediaObjects/572_2019_927_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00572-019-00927-w/MediaObjects/572_2019_927_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00572-019-00927-w/MediaObjects/572_2019_927_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00572-019-00927-w/MediaObjects/572_2019_927_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol 58:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y
Amellal N, Bartoli F, Villemin G et al (1999) Effects of inoculation of EPS-producing Pantoea agglomerans on wheat rhizosphere aggregation. Plant Soil 211:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004403009353
Barra PJ, Pontigo S, Delgado M et al (2019) Phosphobacteria inoculation enhances the benefit of P-fertilization on Lolium perenne in soils contrasting in P-availability. Soil Biol Biochem 136:107516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.06.012
Berta G, Copetta A, Gamalero E, Bona E, Cesaro P, Scarafoni A, D'Agostino G (2014) Maize development and grain quality are differentially affected by mycorrhizal fungi and a growth-promoting pseudomonad in the field. Mycorrhiza 24:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0523-x
Boldt K, Pörs Y, Haupt B, Bitterlich M, Kühn C, Grimm B, Franken P (2011) Photochemical processes, carbon assimilation and RNA accumulation of sucrose transporter genes in tomato arbuscular mycorrhiza. J Plant Physiol 168:1256–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2011.01.026
Bona E, Cantamessa S, Massa N, Manassero P, Marsano F, Copetta A, Lingua G, D'Agostino G, Gamalero E, Berta G (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads improve yield, quality and nutritional value of tomato: a field study. Mycorrhiza 27:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0727-y
Borges R, Mallarino AP (2000) Grain yield, early growth, and nutrient uptake of no-till soybean as affected by phosphorus and potassium placement. Agron J 92:380. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2000.922380x
Bücking H, Kafle A (2015) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nitrogen uptake of plants: current knowledge and research gaps. Agronomy 5:587–612. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy5040587
Chen L, Xu M, Zheng Y et al (2014) Growth promotion and induction of antioxidant system of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by endophyte TPs-04 under low night temperature. Sci Hortic 176:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.06.032
Chen J, Seven J, Zilla T et al (2019) Microbial C:N:P stoichiometry and turnover depend on nutrients availability in soil: a 14C, 15N and 33P triple labelling study. Soil Biol Biochem 131:206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.017
Danneberg G, Latus C, Zimmer W et al (1993) Influence of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza on phytohormone balances in maize (Zea mays L.). J Plant Physiol 141:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80848-5
Dastager SG, Deepa CK, Pandey A (2010) Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:987–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.006
Dawson CJ, Hilton J (2011) Fertiliser availability in a resource-limited world: production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy 36:S14–S22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.012
Firn J, McGree JM, Harvey E et al (2019) Leaf nutrients, not specific leaf area, are consistent indicators of elevated nutrient inputs. Nat Ecol Evol 3:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0790-1
Fusconi A (2014) Regulation of root morphogenesis in arbuscular mycorrhizae: what role do fungal exudates, phosphate, sugars and hormones play in lateral root formation? Ann Bot 113:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct258
Germida JJ, Walley FL (1996) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alter rooting patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization of field-grown spring wheat. Biol Fertil Soils 23:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050147
Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
Giri B, Prasad R, Varma A (eds) (2018) Root biology. Springer International Publishing, Cham
Gond SK, Torres MS, Bergen MS et al (2015) Induction of salt tolerance and up-regulation of aquaporin genes in tropical corn by rhizobacterium Pantoea agglomerans. Lett Appl Microbiol 60:392–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12385
Hauser E (2004) Pseudomonas psychrotolerans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1633–1637. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03024-0
Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C et al (2009) Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 321:153–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9929-9
Hünninghaus M, Dibbern D, Kramer S et al (2019) Disentangling carbon flow across microbial kingdoms in the rhizosphere of maize. Soil Biol Biochem 134:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.007
in ’t Zandt D, van den Brink A, de Kroon H, Visser EJW (2019) Plant–soil feedback is shut down when nutrients come to town. Plant Soil 439:541–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04050-9
Janos DP (2007) Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza 17:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0094-1
Johnson NC (2010) Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytol 185:631–647
Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Wilson JA et al (2015) Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the law of the minimum. New Phytol 205:1473–1484. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13172
Kaur G, Reddy MS (2015) Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, rock phosphate and chemical fertilizers on maize–wheat crop** cycle and economics. Pedosphere 25:428–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30010-2
Kumar P, Lucini L, Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Kalunke RM, Colla G (2015) Insight into the role of grafting and arbuscular mycorrhiza on cadmium stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci 6:477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00477
Larsen J, Cornejo P, Barea JM (2009) Interactions between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Paenibacillus polymyxa and P. macerans in the mycorrhizosphere of Cucumis sativus. Soil Biol Biochem 41:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.029
Lazzara S, Militello M, Carrubba A, Napoli E, Saia S (2017) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi altered the hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin content in flowers of Hypericum perforatum grown under contrasting P availability in a highly organic substrate. Mycorrhiza 27:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0756-6
Lehman RM, Osborne SL, Taheri WI, Buyer JS, Chim BK (2019) Comparative measurements of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to agricultural management practices. Mycorrhiza 29:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00884-4
Lennox ES (1955) Transduction of linked genetic characters of the host by bacteriophage P1. Virology 1:190–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(55)90016-7
Li L, Li S-M, Sun J-H, Zhou LL, Bao XG, Zhang HG, Zhang FS (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:11192–11196. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704591104
Londoño DMM, Meyer E, González D, Hernández AG, Soares CRFS, Lovato PE (2019) Landrace maize varieties differ from conventional and genetically modified hybrid maize in response to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 29:237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00883-5
López-Carmona DA, Alarcón A, Martínez-Romero E et al (2019) Maize plant growth response to whole rhizosphere microbial communities in different mineral N and P fertilization scenarios. Rhizosphere 9:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.11.004
Lum MR, Hirsch AM (2003) Roots and their symbiotic microbes: strategies to obtain nitrogen and phosphorus in a nutrient-limiting environment. J Plant Growth Regul 21:368–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0003-1
Luziatelli F, Ficca AG, Colla G et al (2016) Effects of a protein hydrolysate-based biostimulant and two micronutrient based fertilizers on plant growth and epiphytic bacterial population of lettuce. Acta Hortic 1148:43–48. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1148.5
Luziatelli F, Ficca AG, Colla G et al (2019) Foliar application of vegetal-derived bioactive compounds stimulates the growth of beneficial bacteria and enhances microbiome biodiversity in lettuce. Front Plant Sci 10:60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00060
MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Potter PA, Ramankutty N (2011) Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world’s croplands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:3086–3091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010808108
Mallarino AP, Bordoli JM, Borges R (1999) Phosphorus and potassium placement effects on early growth and nutrient uptake of no-till corn and relationships with grain yield. Agron J 91:37. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100010007x
Mantelin S, Touraine B (2003) Plant growth-promoting bacteria and nitrate availability: impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 55:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh010
Mpanga I, Nkebiwe P, Kuhlmann M et al (2019) The form of N supply determines plant growth promotion by P-solubilizing microorganisms in maize. Microorganisms 7:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7020038
Murphy J, Riley JP (1692) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36
Nassal D (2017) The functional role of phosphorus-mobilizing bacteria in the rhizosphere of tomato and maize. University of Hohenheim. PhD Dissertation (available at: http://opus.uni-hohenheim.de/volltexte/2018/1463/pdf/Diss_Dinah_Nassal.pdf)
Nassal D, Spohn M, Eltlbany N, Jacquiod S, Smalla K, Marhan S, Kandeler E (2018) Effects of phosphorus-mobilizing bacteria on tomato growth and soil microbial activity. Plant Soil 427:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3528-y
Pengelly BC, Maass BL (2001) Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet—diversity, potential use and determination of a core collection of this multi-purpose tropical legume. Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011286111384
Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55:158–IN18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
Ramaekers L, Remans R, Rao IM et al (2010) Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants. Field Crops Res 117:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.03.001
Raven JA, Lambers H, Smith SE, Westoby M (2018) Costs of acquiring phosphorus by vascular land plants: patterns and implications for plant coexistence. New Phytol 217:1420–1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14967
Rice CW, Tiedje JM (1989) Regulation of nitrate assimilation by ammonium in soils and in isolated soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 21:597–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(89)90135-1
Rodríguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00014-2
Rouphael Y, Colla G (2018) Synergistic biostimulatory action: designing the next generation of plant biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 9:. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01655
Saia S, Amato G, Frenda AS, Giambalvo D, Ruisi P (2014a) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on biomass production and nitrogen fixation of berseem clover plants subjected to water stress. PLoS One 9:e90738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090738
Saia S, Benítez E, García-Garrido JM et al (2014b) The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on total plant nitrogen uptake and nitrogen recovery from soil organic material. J Agric Sci 152:370–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185961300004X
Saia S, Rappa V, Ruisi P et al (2015a) Soil inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms promotes plant growth and nutrient transporter genes expression in durum wheat. Front Plant Sci 6:815
Saia S, Ruisi P, Fileccia V, di Miceli G, Amato G, Martinelli F (2015b) Metabolomics suggests that soil inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decreased free amino acid content in roots of durum wheat grown under N-limited, P-rich field conditions. PLoS One 10:e0129591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129591
Saia S, Colla G, Raimondi G et al (2019a) An endophytic fungi-based biostimulant modulated lettuce yield, physiological and functional quality responses to both moderate and severe water limitation. Sci Hortic 256:108595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108595
Saia S, Fragasso M, De Vita P, Beleggia R (2019b) Metabolomics provide valuable insight for the study of durum wheat: a review. J Agric Food Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b07097
Saia S, Tamayo E, Schillaci C, De Vita P (2020) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nutrient cycling in crop** systems. In: Datta R, Pathan SI, Ceccherini MT, Meena RS (eds) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 87–115
Schabenberger O (2005) Introducing the Glimmix procedure for generalized linear mixed models. SUGI 30 Proc 1–20. Doi: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/toc.html#fm
Shahzad R, Waqas M, Khan AL, al-Hosni K, Kang SM, Seo CW, Lee IJ (2017) Indoleacetic acid production and plant growth promoting potential of bacterial endophytes isolated from rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds. Acta Biol Hung 68:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1556/018.68.2017.2.5
Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I (2003) Mycorrhizal fungi can dominate phosphate supply to plants irrespective of growth responses. Plant Physiol 133:16–20
Sundara-Rao W, Sinha M (1963) Phosphate dissolving micro-organisms in the soil and rhizosphere. Indian J Agric Sci 33:272
Taktek S, St-Arnaud M, Piché Y, Fortin JA, Antoun H (2017) Igneous phosphate rock solubilization by biofilm-forming mycorrhizobacteria and hyphobacteria associated with Rhizoglomus irregulare DAOM 197198. Mycorrhiza 27:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0726-z
Valat L, Deglène-Benbrahim L, Kendel M, Hussenet R, Jeune C, Schellenbaum P, Maillot P (2018) Transcriptional induction of two phosphate transporter 1 genes and enhanced root branching in grape plants inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae. Mycorrhiza 28:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0809-5
Verma P, Yadav A, Kazy S (2014) Evaluating the diversity and phylogeny of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing in central zone of India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3:432–447
Vinci G, Cozzolino V, Mazzei P, Monda H, Savy D, Drosos M, Piccolo A (2018) Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and different phosphorus sources on maize plants as revealed by NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics. Plant Soil 429:437–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3701-y
Vivekanandan M, Fixen PE (1991) Crop** systems effects on mycorrhizal colonization, early growth, and phosphorus uptake of corn. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:136. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500010024x
Walterson AM, Stavrinides J (2015) Pantoea: insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:968–984. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuv027
Wen Z, Li H, Shen Q et al (2019) Tradeoffs among root morphology, exudation and mycorrhizal symbioses for phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 16 crop species. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15833
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to Prof. Guido Lingua (Università del Piemonte Orientale, Italy) for kind advice on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 1159 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saia, S., Aissa, E., Luziatelli, F. et al. Growth-promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially benefit tomato and corn depending upon the supplied form of phosphorus. Mycorrhiza 30, 133–147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00927-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00927-w