Abstract
Purpose
Literature on marital self-disclosure interventions for cancer patients lacks consistency in methodology and content. Moreover, the impact of such interventions on physical and psychological health, marital relationships, and self-disclosure ability is controversial. This review aims to systematically analyze the studies of marital self-disclosure intervention, synthesize the structure and topics of marital self-disclosure, and summarize and evaluate its effects on improving physical and psychological outcomes and marital relationships in cancer patients and their spouses.
Method
This systematic review used the preferred reporting items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled and quasi-experimental studies published from the establishment of the database to October 2022. Marital self-disclosure interventions were conducted with both cancer patients and their spouses. Studies published in a language other than English or Chinese, and studies below a quality grade of C were excluded. Data were extracted through a standardized data collection form, and two reviewers independently extracted and evaluated the data. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and a third reviewer adjudicated in case of disagreement. The data were synthesized by vote counting based on direction of effect according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline.
Results
Thirteen studies were included in the review. Based on quality evaluation, three studies were categorized as grade A (good), and ten studies were grade B (moderate). Seven studies reported moderate rates of participant refusal and attrition. The structure and topics of marital self-disclosure varied across different studies. The five studies had various prespecified disclosure topics, such as fear of cancer recurrence, benefit finding, and emotional distress. The overall results suggest that marital self-disclosure interventions can improve physical and psychological health, enhance marital relationships, and increase self-disclosure ability.
Conclusion
The limited number of studies, small sample sizes, diverse intervention strategies, and methodological heterogeneity weakened the evidence base for the effectiveness of marital self-disclosure interventions. Therefore, further high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recommended to confirm the effectiveness of such interventions. These studies should also evaluate the interventions’ long-term impact, analyze optional topics and methods, identify key features, and explore the development of the best intervention program.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this systematic review can be found in the paper and its supplementary information.
References
Bodenmann G (2000) Stress and co** in couples. Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany
Goldsmith DJ, Miller GA (2015) Should I tell you how I feel? A mixed method analysis of couples’ talk about cancer. J Appl Commun Res 43(3):273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2015.1052832
Goldsmith DJ, Miller GA (2014) Conceptualizing how couples talk about cancer. Heal Commun 29(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.717215
Lindau ST et al (2011) Communication about sexuality and intimacy in couples affected by lung cancer and their clinical-care providers. Psychooncology 20(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1787
Lopez V, Copp G, Molassiotis A (2012) Male caregivers of patients with breast and gynecologic cancer experiences from caring for their spouses and partners. Cancer Nurs 35(6):402–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e318231daf0
Langer SL et al (2018) Links Between Communication and relationship satisfaction among patients with cancer and their spouses: Results of a fourteen-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study. Front in Psych 9:1843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01843
Badr H (2017) New frontiers in couple-based interventions in cancer care: refining the prescription for spousal communication. Acta Oncol 56(2):139–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266079
Warmoth K et al (2017) Exploring the social needs and challenges of Chinese American immigrant breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study using an expressive writing approach. Intern J Behav Med 24(6):827–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9661-4
Soriano EC et al (2018) Social constraints and fear of recurrence in couples co** with early stage breast cancer. Heal Psych 37(9):874. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000649
Badr H, J Bakhshaie J, Chhabria K (2019) Dyadic Interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers: state of the science and new directions. Semin Oncol Nurs 35(4):337–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.004
Bodenmann G, Falconier MK, Randall AK et al (2018) Systemic-transactional model of dyadic co**. Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy. Cham: Springer, online. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_761-1
Falconier MK, Jackson JB, Bodenmann G et al (2015) Dyadic co** and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinic Psych Rev 42:28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Hurwitz H (2009) Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 115(S18):4326–4338. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24578
Zhang M (2019) Construction of benefit discovery intervention program for breast cancer patients based on self-disclosure. Anhui Medical University
Kershaw TS, Mood DW, Newth G et al (2008) Longitudinal analysis of a model to predict quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Annal Behav Med 36(2):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9058-3
Lepore SJ, Revenson TA (2007) Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Pers Psychol Comp 1(1):313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00013.x
Hagedoorn M, Puterman E, Sanderman R et al (2011) Is self-disclosure in couples co** with cancer associated with improvement in depressive symptoms? Healt Psychol 30(6):753. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024374
Porter LS, Samsa G, Steel JL (2019) Caregiver-guided pain co** skills training for patients with advanced cancer: Background, design, and challenges for the CaringPals study. Clinic Trial 16(3):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774519829695
Traa MJ, De Vries J, Bodenmann G et al (2015) Dyadic co** and relationship functioning in couples co** with cancer: a systematic review. Brit J Heal Psychol 20(1):85–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12094
Li Q, Loke AY (2013) The positive aspects of caregiving for cancer patients: a critical review of the literature and directions for future research. Psychooncology 22(11):2399–2407. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3311
Chen M, Gong J, Cao Q et al (2021) A literature review of the relationship between dyadic co** and dyadic outcomes in cancer couples. Europ J Oncol Nurs 54:102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102035
Badr H, Krebs P (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples co** with cancer. Psychooncology 22(8):1688–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3200
Regan TW, Lambert SD, Girgis A et al (2012) Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer?: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 12:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-279
Page MJ, Mckenzie JE, Bossuyt P et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Intern J Surg 88:105. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. JMDE, https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde
Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A et al (2020) Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ, 368. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
Zhang X, Jia Z, Cheng Y et al (2019) The application of self-disclosure in young breast cancer patients with cancer recurrence fear intervention. Chinese J Nurs 54(11):1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.11.002
Wang DD, Ling S, Ning T et al (2021) The application of couples’ self-disclosure in young and middle-aged early lung cancer patients and their spouses. Chin J Mod Nurs 27(06):803–807. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20200703-04204
Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Baucom DH et al (2017) A randomized pilot trial of a videoconference couples communication intervention for advanced GI cancer. Psychooncology 26(7):1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4121
Porter LS, Baucom DH, Keefe FJ et al (2009) Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 115:4326–4338. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24578
Nicolaisen A, Hagedoorn M, Hansen DG et al (2018) The effect of an attachment-oriented couple intervention for breast cancer patients and partners in the early treatment phase: A randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology 27(3):922–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4613
McLean LM, Walton T, Rodin G et al (2013) A couple-based intervention for patients and caregivers facing end-stage cancer: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 22(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2046
Manne SL, Kissane D, Nelson CJ et al (2011) Intimacy-enhancing psychological intervention for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. J Sex Med 8(4):1197–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02163.x
Manne SL, Kashy DA, Zaider T et al (2019) Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Health Psychol 24(2):396–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12359
Heinrichs N, Zimmermann T, Huber B et al (2012) Cancer distress reduction with a couple-based skills training: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 43(2):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9314-9
Gremore TM, Brockstein B, Porter LS et al (2021) Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial. Support Care Cancer 29(6):3267–3275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05848-5
Duan S, Zhang QL, Dou AP et al (2022) Effects of binary co** intervention on patients and their spouses after breast cancer surgery. J Nurs 37(04):71–74. https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.04.071
Couper J, Collins A, Bloch S et al (2015) Cognitive existential couple therapy (CECT) in men and partners facing localised prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 115(Suppl 5):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12991
Pennebaker JW (1997) Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychol Sci 8(3):162–166
Chelune GJ et al (1984) Self-disclosure and its relationship to marital intimacy. J of Clinical Psychology 40(1):216–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x
Prager KJ (1997) The psychology of intimacy. Guilford Press
Porter LS, Baucom DH, Keefe FJ et al (2012) Reactions to a partner-assisted emotional disclosure intervention: direct observation and self-report of patient and partner communication. J Marit Fam Ther 38:284–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00278.x
Zhang X, Jia Z, Cheng Y et al (2019) The application of self-disclosure in young breast cancer patients with cancer recurrence fear intervention. Chin J Nurs 54(11):1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.11.002
Porter LS, Keefe JF, Baucom DH et al (2009) Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 115(18 Suppl):4326–4338. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24578
Badr H, Herbert LY, Chhabria K et al (2019) Self-management intervention for head and neck cancer couples: Results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer 125(7):1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31906
Langer SL, Brown JD, Syrjala KL (2009) Intrapersonal and interpersonal consequences of protective buffering among cancer patients and caregivers. Cancer 115(S18):4311–4325. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24586
Perndorfer C, Soriano EC, Siegel SD et al (2019) Everyday protective buffering predicts intimacy and fear of cancer recurrence in couples co** with early-stage breast cancer. Psychooncology 28(2):317–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4942
Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA et al (2010) Dyadic co** in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol 29(2):169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018165
Watts KJ, Sherman KA, Mireskandari S et al (2011) Predictors of relationship adjustment among couples co** with a high risk of develo** breast/ovarian cancer. Psychol Heal 26(sup1):21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870441003592587
Ernst J, Hinz A, Niederwieser D et al (2017) Dyadic co** of patients with hematologic malignancies and their partners and its relation to quality of life–a longitudinal study. Leuk Lymph 58(3):655–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2016.1194983
Rottmann N, Hansen DG, Larsen PV et al (2015) Dyadic co** within couples dealing with breast cancer: a longitudinal, population-based study. Heal Psychol 34(5):486. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000218
Baucom DH, Kirby JS, Kelly JT et al (2009) Couple-based interventions for medical problems. Behav Ther 43(1):61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.008
Li H, Wong CL, ** XH et al (2021) Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on health-related outcomes for patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. In J Nurs Stud 115:103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103876
Elyasi F, Moosazadeh M (2021) Cognitive-behavioral therapy and hypnosis intervention on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a clinical trial. Mid East J Cancer 12(2):236–248
Tao W, Luo X, Cui B et al (2015) Practice of traditional Chinese medicine for psycho-behavioral intervention improves quality of life in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 6(37):397 10.18632/oncotarget.5388
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ye Zhou, Yin Lu, Haiyan Zhao: data extraction and literature quality appraisal. Ye Zhou: data analysis, writing—original draft preparation. Chong Chin Che, Mei Chan Chong: supervision, conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The systematic review is not subject to ethical review.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, Y., Che, C.C., Chong, M.C. et al. Effects of marital self-disclosure on marital relationship and psychological outcome for cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 31, 361 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07826-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07826-z