Log in

Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This qualitative study examined how young adult breast cancer survivors (YABCS) and their partners appraised and managed their sexual health and intimate relationships after cancer.

Methods

We conducted concurrent, individual telephone interviews with 25 YABCS and their male partners. We utilized a thematic, inductive analysis to examine individual interviews, followed by analysis within and across couples to identify dyadic themes. We explored how themes mapped on to the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management to build a conceptual model specific to the sexual health challenges of young adult couples living with cancer.

Results

Our analysis revealed five interconnected themes: (1) shared understanding of physical and psychological challenges of sexual health after cancer, (2) navigating role shifts and changes to sexual relationship, (3) getting through it as a team, (4) maintaining open communication, and (5) need for services and support for partners/caregivers and couples.

Conclusion

Both survivors and their partners articulated physical (e.g., painful sex, decreased libido) and psychological (e.g., guilt, self-consciousness) challenges to their sexual health in survivorship. Our dyadic focus revealed a spectrum of ways that couples managed the changes to their relationships and sexual health, highlighting “open communication” and strategies for “working as a team” as critical. There is no “one size fits all” solution, as individuals and couples cope with and manage these challenges in different ways. Study results can inform couple-focused intervention strategies, such as creating shared understanding of sexual health after cancer and improving communication skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures, 2018

  2. **g L, Zhang C, Li W, ** F, Wang A (2019) Incidence and severity of sexual dysfunction among women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis based on female sexual function index. Support Care Cancer 27:1171–1180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert E, Ussher JM, Perz J (2010) Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Maturitas 66:397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paterson CL, Lengacher CA, Donovan KA, Kip KE, Tofthagen CS (2016) Body image in younger breast Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs 39:E39–E58

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton AM, Handy AB, Meston CM (2018) Sexual function in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 12:47–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson EG, Sansom-Daly UM, Wakefield CE, Ellis SJ, McGill BC, Doolan EL, Cohn RJ (2016) Sexual and romantic relationships: experiences of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 5:286–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungman L, Ahlgren J, Petersson LM, Flynn KE, Weinfurt K, Gorman JR, Wettergren L, Lampic C (2018) Sexual dysfunction and reproductive concerns in young women with breast cancer: type, prevalence, and predictors of problems. Psycho-oncology 27:2770–2777

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabile C, Goldfarb S, Baser RE, Goldfrank DJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Dickler MN, Carter J (2017) Sexual health needs and educational intervention preferences for women with cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:77–84

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dobinson KA, Hoyt MA, Seidler ZE, Beaumont AL, Hullmann SE, Lawsin CR (2016) A grounded theory investigation into the psychosexual unmet needs of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 5:135–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beckjord E, Campas BE (2007) Sexual quality of life in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 25:19–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blouet A, Zinger M, Capitain O, Landry S, Bourgeois H, Seegers VT, Pointreau Y (2019) Sexual quality of life evaluation after treatment among women with breast cancer under 35 years old. Support Care Cancer 27:879–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilbert E, Ussher JM, Perz J (2011) Sexuality after gynaecological cancer: a review of the material, intrapsychic, and discursive aspects of treatment on women’s sexual-wellbeing. Maturitas 70:42–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berg CA, Upchurch R (2007) A developmental-contextual model of couples co** with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull 133:920–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CS, Vellone E, Lyons KS, Cocchieri A, Bidwell JT, D’Agostino F, Hiatt SO, Alvaro R, Buck HG, Riegel B (2015) Patterns and predictors of patient and caregiver engagement in heart failure care: a multi-level dyadic study. Int J Nurs Stud 52:588–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyons KS, Lee CS, Bennett JA, Nail LM, Fromme EK, Hiatt SO, Sayer AG (2014) Symptom incongruence trajectories in lung cancer dyads. J Pain Symptom Manag 48:1031–1040

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loaring JM, Larkin M, Shaw R, Flowers P (2015) Renegotiating sexual intimacy in the context of altered embodiment: the experiences of women with breast cancer and their male partners following mastectomy and reconstruction. Health Psychol 34:426–436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manne SL (1999) Intrusive thoughts and psycholgocial distress among cancer patietns: the role of spouse avoidance and criticism. J Consult Clin Psychol 67:539–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Manne SL, Dougherty J, Veach S, Kless R (1999) Hiding worries from one’s spouse: protective buffering among cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Res Ther Control 8:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  19. Borstelmann N, Rosenberg SM, Gelber SI, Meyer ME, Ruddy KJ, Schapira L, Come SE, Borges VF, Cadet T, Maramaldi P, Partridge AH (2017) Partners of young breast cancer survivors: a cross-sectional evaluation of psychosocial issues and mental health. J Clin Oncol 35:184–184

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keesing S, Rosenwax L, McNamara B (2016) A dyadic approach to understanding the impact of breast cancer on relationships between partners during early survivorship. BMC Womens Health 16:57

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ (2017) Lovesick: how couples’ relationships influence health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 13:421–443

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Coyne JC, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J (2008) Distress in couples co** with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull 134:1–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyons KS, Lee CS (2018) The theory of dyadic illness management. J Fam Nurs 24:8–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin HJ, Rubin I (2012) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson L, Walker AJ (1982) The dyad as the unit of analysis - conceptual and methodological issues. J Marriage Fam 44:889–900

    Google Scholar 

  26. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E, Australian C, Sexuality Study T (2014) Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer 14:228

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bober SL, Varela VS (2012) Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 30:3712–3719

    Google Scholar 

  29. Geue K, Schmidt R, Sender A, Sauter S, Friedrich M (2015) Sexuality and romantic relationships in young adult cancer survivors: satisfaction and supportive care needs. Psycho-oncology 24:1368–1376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murphy D, Klosky JL, Termuhlen A, Sawczyn KK, Quinn GP (2013) The need for reproductive and sexual health discussions with adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Contraception 88:215–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kayser K, Watson LE, Adnrade JT (2007) Cancer as a “we-disease”: examining the process of co** from a relational perspective. Fam Syst Health 25:404–418

    Google Scholar 

  32. Manne S, Ostroff J, Winkel G, Goldstein L, Fox K, Grana G (2004) Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: patient, partner, and couple perspectives. Psychosom Med 66:442–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Norton TR, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G (2006) Cancer-related relationship communication in couples co** with early stage breast cancer. Psycho-oncology 15:234–247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Badr H, Acitelli LK, Taylor CL (2008) Does talking about their relationship affect couples' marital and psychological adjustment to lung cancer? J Cancer Surviv: Res Pract 2:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee CS, Lyons KS (2019) Patterns, relevance and predictors of dyadic mental health over time in lung cancer. Psycho-oncology 28:1721–1727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Badr H, Taylor CL (2006) Social constraints and spousal communication in lung cancer. Psycho-oncology 15:673–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuijer RG, Ybema JF, Buunk BP, De Jong GM, Thijs-Boer F, Sanderman R (2000) Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. J Soc Clin Psychol 19:256–275

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hawkins Y, Ussher J, Gilbert E, Perz J, Sandoval M, Sundquist K (2009) Changes in sexuality and intimacy after the diagnosis and treatment of cancer: the experience of partners in a sexual relationship with a person with cancer. Cancer Nurs 32:271–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson L, Miedema B, Easley J (2014) Young adult cancer survivors and the challenges of intimacy. J Psychosoc Oncol 32:447–462

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E (2014) Women’s sexuality after cancer: a qualitative analysis of sexual changes and renegotiation. Women Ther 37:205–221

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Gremore TM, Keefe FJ (2005) Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer. Breast Dis 23:103–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. DuBenske LL, Gustafson DH, Namkoong K, Hawkins RP, Atwood AK, Brown RL, Chih MY, McTavish F, Carmack CL, Buss MK, Govindan R, Cleary JF (2014) CHESS improves Cancer Caregivers' burden and mood: results of an eHealth RCT. Health Psychol 33:1261–1272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wiklander M, Strandquist J, Obol CM, Eriksson LE, Winterling J, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Fugl-Meyer KS, Ahlgren J, Ljungman P, Lampic C, Wettergren L (2017) Feasibility of a self-help web-based intervention targeting young cancer patients with sexual problems and fertility distress. Support Care Cancer 25:3675–3682

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Christie KM, Meyerowitz BE, Stanton AL, Rowland JH, Ganz PA (2013) Characteristics of breast cancer survivors that predict partners' participation in research. Ann Behav Med 46:107–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Emilee G, Ussher JM, Perz J (2010) Sexuality after breast cancer: a review. Maturitas 66:397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Recruitment was facilitated by Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation’s Army of Women. We would like to thank the cancer survivors and their partners who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was funded by Oregon State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica R. Gorman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Protection of human subjects

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Oregon State University Human Research Protection Program, protocol 7621) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorman, J.R., Smith, E., Drizin, J.H. et al. Navigating sexual health in cancer survivorship: a dyadic perspective. Support Care Cancer 28, 5429–5439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05396-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05396-y

Keywords

Navigation