Log in

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary (MIS HPB) surgery can be performed with good outcomes, there are currently no standardized requirements for centers or surgeons who wish to implement MIS HPB surgery. The aim of this study was to create a consensus statement regarding safe dissemination and implementation of MIS HPB surgical programs.

Methods

Sixteen key questions regarding safety in MIS HPB surgery were generated after a focused literature search and iterative review by three field experts. Participants for the working group were then selected using sequential purposive sampling and snowball techniques. Review of the 16 questions took place over a single 2-h meeting. The senior author facilitated the session, and a modified nominal group technique was used.

Results

Twenty three surgeons were in attendance. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that formal guidelines should exist for both institutions and individual surgeons interested in implementing MIS HPB surgery and that routine monitoring and reporting of institutional and surgeon technical outcomes should be performed. Regarding volume cutoffs, most participants (91%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual institutional volume cutoff for complex MIS HPB surgery, such as major hepatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy, should exist. A smaller proportion (74%) agreed or strongly agreed that a minimum annual surgeon volume requirement should exist. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that surgeons were responsible for defining (100%) and enforcing (78%) guidelines to ensure the overall safety of MIS HPB programs. Finally, formal MIS HPB training, minimum case volume requirements, institutional support and infrastructure, and mandatory collection of outcomes data were all recognized as important aspects of safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery.

Conclusions

Safe implementation of MIS HPB surgery requires a thoughtful process that incorporates structured training, sufficient volume and expertise, a proper institutional ecosystem, and monitoring of outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, van Dam R, Dejong C, van Duyn E, Dijkgraaf M, van Eijck C, Festen S, Gerhards M, GrootKoerkamp B, de Hingh I, Kazemier G, Klaase J, de Kleine R, van Laarhoven C, Luyer M, Patijn G, Steenvoorde P, Suker M, AbuHilal M, Busch O, Besselink M, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2019) Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirnezami R, Mirnezami AH, Chandrakumaran K, Abu Hilal M, Pearce NW, Primrose JN, Sutcliffe RP (2011) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 13:295–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Topal H, Aerts R, Laenen A, Collignon A, Jaekers J, Geers J, Topal B (2022) Survival after minimally invasive vs open surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. White CA, Patel AV, Butler LR, Amakiri UO, Yeshoua BJ, Steinberger JM, Cho SK, Kim JS (2022) Comparison of patient preference, understanding, and sentiment for minimally invasive versus open spine surgery. Spine 47:309–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Narain AS, Hijji FY, Duhancioglu G, Haws BE, Khechen B, Manning BT, Colman MW, Singh K (2018) Patient perceptions of minimally invasive versus open spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg 31:E184–E192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emmen AMLH, Görgec B, Zwart MJW, Daams F, Erdmann J, Festen S, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM, van Hilst J, Kazemier G, Lof S, Sussenbach SI, Tanis PJ, Zonderhuis BM, Busch OR, Swijnenburg RJ, Besselink MG, for HPB-Amsterdam (2023) Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections. Surg Endosc 37:2659–2672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Korrel M, Lof S, Alseidi AA, Asbun HJ, Boggi U, Hogg ME, Jang JY, Nakamura M, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, International Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (I-MIPS) (2022) Framework for training in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an International Delphi Consensus Study. J Am Coll Surg 235:383–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, D’Angelica MI, Balduzzi A, Bassi C, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Callery MP, Del Chiaro M, Coimbra FJ, Conrad C, Cook A, Coppola A, Dervenis C, Dokmak S, Edil BH, Edwin B, Giulianotti PC, Han HS, Hansen PD, van der Heijde N, van Hilst J, Hester CA, Hogg ME, Jarufe N, Jeyarajah DR, Keck T, Kim SC, Khatkov IE, Kokudo N, Kooby DA, Korrel M, de Leon FJ, Lluis N, Lof S, Machado MA, Demartines N, Martinie JB, Merchant NB, Molenaar IQ, Moravek C, Mou YP, Nakamura M, Nealon WH, Palanivelu C, Pessaux P, Pitt HA, Polanco PM, Primrose JN, Rawashdeh A, Sanford DE, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Stauffer JA, Takaori K, Talamonti MS, Tang CN, Vollmer CM, Wakabayashi G, Walsh RM, Wang SE, Zinner MJ, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Zwart MJ, Conlon KC, Kendrick ML, Zeh HJ, Hilal MA, Besselink MG, International Study Group on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Surgery (I-MIPS) (2020) The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Ann Surg 271:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schön MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoman H, Almeida ND, Tanzer M (2023) Ranking decision-making criteria for early adoption of innovative surgical technologies. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Baimas-George M, Watson M, Martinie J, Vrochides D (2021) Curriculum matrix development for a hepato-pancreato-biliary robotic surgery fellowship. Can J Surg 64:E657–E662

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fong Y, Buell JF, Collins J, Martinie J, Bruns C, Tsung A, Clavien PA, Nachmany I, Edwin B, Pratschke J, Solomonov E, Koenigsrainer A, Giulianotti PC (2020) Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum. Surg Endosc 34:4233–4244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palanivelu C, Takaori K, Abu Hilal M, Kooby DA, Wakabayashi G, Agarwal A, Berti S, Besselink MG, Chen KH, Gumbs AA, Han HS, Honda G, Khatkov I, Kim HJ, Li JT, Duy Long TC, Machado MA, Matsushita A, Menon K, Min-Hua Z, Nakamura M, Nagakawa Y, Pekolj J, Poves I, Rahman S, Rong L, Sa Cunha A, Senthilnathan P, Shrikhande SV, Gurumurthy SS, Sup Yoon D, Yoon YS, Khatri VP (2018) International Summit on Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resection (ISLPR) “Coimbatore Summit Statements.” Surg Oncol 27:A10–A15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gotohda N, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Abu Hilal M, Berardi G, Ciria R, Abe Y, Aoki T, Asbun HJ, Chan ACY, Chanwat R, Chen KH, Chen Y, Cheung TT, Fuks D, Han HS, Hasegawa K, Hatano E, Honda G, Itano O, Iwashita Y, Kaneko H, Kato Y, Kim JH, Liu R, López-Ben S, Morimoto M, Monden K, Rotellar F, Sakamoto Y, Sugioka A, Yoshiizumi T, Akahoshi K, Alconchel F, Ariizumi S, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Durán M, Garcia Vazquez A, Golse N, Miyasaka Y, Mori Y, Ogiso S, Shirata C, Tomassini F, Urade T, Wakabayashi T, Nishino H, Hibi T, Kokudo N, Ohtsuka M, Ban D, Nagakawa Y, Ohtsuka T, Tanabe M, Nakamura M, Yamamoto M, Tsuchida A, Wakabayashi G (2022) Expert consensus guidelines: how to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:16–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stefanidis D, Huffman EM, Collins JW, Martino MA, Satava RM, Levy JS (2022) Expert consensus recommendations for robotic surgery credentialing. Ann Surg 276:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D’Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2018) The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268:11–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim HJ, Choi GH, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y, He J, Boggi U, Troisi RI, Efanov M, Azoulay D, Panaro F, Pessaux P, Wang XY, Zhu JY, Zhang SG, Sun CD, Wu Z, Tao KS, Yang KH, Fan J, Chen XP (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 25:1432–1444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Langø T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (2015) European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc 29:253–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C, Tsung A, Yang K, Goh BKP, Chong CC, Kang CM, Peng C, Kakiashvili E, Han HS, Kim HJ, He J, Lee JH, Takaori K, Marino MV, Wang SN, Guo T, Hackert T, Huang TS, Anusak Y, Fong Y, Nagakawa Y, Shyr YM, Wu YM, Zhao Y (2019) International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 8:345–360

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health 42:533–544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirchherr J, Charles K (2018) Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201710

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP (2016) How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm 38:655–662

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J, Balliol Collaboration, Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. The Lancet 374:1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 17:580–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Sinz S, Probst P, de Santibanes M, Shrikhande SV, Tschuor C, Loos M, Mehrabi A, Z’graggen K, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Büchler MW, Nickel F (2022) Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V, Kazakov I, Melekhina O, Kim P, Vankovich A, Grendal K, Berelavichus S, Khatkov I (2017) Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 19:818–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Monia Ilunga, MS, for her ongoing support and assistance in coordinating the working group meeting.

SAGES HPB Committee: Domenech Asbun6, Subhashini Ayloo8, Åsmund Avdem Fretland9, Georgios Georgakis10, Ana Gleisner11, Melissa Hogg12, Onur Kutlu13, David Kwon14, Edwin Onkendi15, Ankit D. Patel16, Nicolò Pecorelli17, Patricio M. Polanco18, Sharona Ross19, Mihir M. Shah16, Eve Simoneau20, Olivier Soubrane21, Iswanto Sucandy19

Funding

J.W. was supported by the University of California, San Francisco, Noyce Initiative Computational Innovator Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. M.M.S. was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health from the Emory K12 Clinical Oncology Training Program (K12 CA237806) and the Georgia CTSA ULI Program (UL1 TR002378). The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hop S. Tran Cao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Adnan Alseidi has received a speaker honorarium from Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson. Domenech Asbun is a consultant for Stryker and has received honoraria from Boston Scientific. Horacio Asbun is a consultant for Stryker, Ethicon, and Boston Scientific. Åsmund Avdem Fretland has received a speaker honorarium from Olympus and Bayer. Sean Cleary is a consultant for Ethicon and is on the advisory panel for Surgical Safety Technology. Georgios Georgakis is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Melissa Hogg has received a research grant from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Ankit D. Patel has received a speaker honorarium from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Sharona Ross is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and has received research grants from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and Medtronic. Hop Tran Cao has received a research grant from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Alice Wei is a consultant for Histosonics and Biosapien. Patricio M. Polanco serves as a proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and a consultant for iota Bioscience inc. and Palisade Bio inc. Edwin Onkendi is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Mihir M. Shah is a proctor for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Jane Wang, Pamela Lu, Misha Armstrong, Kevin El-Hayek, Subhashini Ayloo, Ana Gleisner, Onur Kutlu, David Kwon, Nicolò Pecorelli, Eve Simoneau, Olivier Soubrane, and Iswanto Sucandy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of SAGES HPB Committee are presented in Acknowledgement section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Lu, P., Armstrong, M. et al. Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation. Surg Endosc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10957-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10957-x

Keywords

Navigation