Log in

Are right-sided colectomies for neoplastic disease at increased risk of primary postoperative ileus compared to left-sided colectomies? A coarsened exact matched analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The objective of this study was to determine whether right-sided colectomies (RC) were associated with a higher incidence of primary postoperative ileus (pPOI) compared to left-sided colectomies (LC).

Methods

Patients who underwent elective colectomy for neoplastic disease between 2012 and 2016 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. RC and LC were defined as having an ileocolic or colocolic/colorectal anastomosis, respectively. Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) was used to balance the two groups (1:1) on important confounders. The association between type of colectomy and pPOI, defined as POI in the absence of intra-abdominal sepsis, was then assessed in a multiple logistic regression analysis of the matched data.

Results

Of 40,636 patients who underwent a colectomy for neoplastic disease, 15,231 underwent a RC and 25,405 a LC. After CEM, 12,949 matched patients remained in each group, and all important confounders were well balanced. The incidence of pPOI was higher in the RC group (11.5% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001). On multiple logistic regression, RC was associated with a 35% higher odds of develo** pPOI compared to LC (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.25–1.47). RC was also associated with increased risk for NSQIP-defined major morbidity (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), 30-day readmission (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06–1.27), and increased length of stay (β = 0.16 days, 95% CI 0.11–0.22).

Conclusion

pPOI is more common after RC than LC. Future research should aim at better understanding the pathophysiology behind this increased risk and identifying interventions to mitigate pPOI in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2018) Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 68:7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee L, Erkan A, Alhassan N, Kelly JJ, Nassif GJ, Albert MR, Monson J (2018) Lower survival after right-sided versus left-sided colon cancers: is an extended lymphadenectomy the answer? Surg Oncol 27:449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jung MK, Shin US, Ki YJ, Kim YB, Moon SM, Sung SJ (2017) Is the location of the tumor another prognostic factor for patients with colon cancer? Ann Coloproctol 33:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwaan MR, Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Chow CJ, Rothenberger DA, Habermann EB (2013) Are right-sided colectomy outcomes different from left-sided colectomy outcomes? Study of patients with colon cancer in the ACS NSQIP database. JAMA Surg 148:504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Masoomi H, Buchberg B, Dang P, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2011) Outcomes of right vs. left colectomy for colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2023–2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baig MK, Wexner SD (2004) Postoperative ileus: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, Kennedy GD (2015) Postopertiave ileus—more than just prolonged length of stay? J Gastrointest Surg 19:1684–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Colon/Rectum Carcinomas (Primary Tumor) Study Group (2010) Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 53:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan L, O’Grady G, Milne T, Jaung R, Vather R, Bissett IP (2018) Prospective comparison of return of bowel function after left versus right colectomy. ANZ J Surg 88:E242–E247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kummer A, Slieker J, Grass F, Hahnloser D, Demartines N, Hubner M (2016) Ehanced recovery pathway for right and left colectomy: comparison of functional recovery. World J Surg 40:2519–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Campana JP, Pellegrini PA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Mentz RE, Vaccaro CA (2017) Right versus left laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: does side make a difference? Int J Colorectal Dis 32:907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hwang GS, Hanna MH, Phelan M, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ (2016) Risk factors for prolonged ileus following colon surgery. Surg Endosc 30:603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vather R, Bissett IP (2013) Risk factors for the development of prolonged post-operative ileus following elective colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1385–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aydinli HH, Aytac E, Remzi FH, Bernstein M, Grucela AL (2018) Factors associated with short-term morbidity in patients undergoing resection for Crohn’s disease. J Gastrointest Surg 22:1434–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolthius AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, Buck van Overstraeten A, Boeckxstaens G, D’Hoore A (2016) Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 18:O1–O9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hain E, Maggiori L, Mongin C, Prost A la Denise J, Panis Y (2018) Risk factors for prolonged postopertaive ileus after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an analysis of 428 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 32:337–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapuis PH, Bokey L, Keshava A, Rickard MJ, Stewart P, Young CJ, Dent OF (2013) Risk factors for prolonged ileus after resection of colorectal cancer: an observational study of 2,400 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 257:909–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, Robertson J, Bissett I (2015) Development of a risk stratification system for the occurrence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a prospective risk factor analysis. Surgery 157:764–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Courtot L, Le Roy B, Memeo R, Voron T, de Angelis N, Tabchouri N, Brunetti F, Berger A, Mutter D, Gagniere J, Salame E, Pezet D, Ouaissi M (2018) Risk factors for postoperative ileus following elective laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1373–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grass F, Slieker J, Jurt J, Kummer A, Sola J, Hahnloser D, Demartines N, Hubner N (2017) Postoperative ileus in an enhanced recovery pathway—a retrospective cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugawara K, Kawaguchi Y, Nomura Y, Suka Y, Kawasaki K, Uemura Y, Koike D, Nagai M, Furuya T, Tanaka N (2018) Perioperative factors predicting prolonged postoperative ileus after major abdominal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 22:508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells AR, Hamar B, Bradley C, Gandy WM, Harrison PL, Sidney JA, Coberley CR, Rula EY, Pope JE (2013) Exploring robust methods for evaluating treatment and comparison groups in chronic care management programs. Popul Health Manag 16:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Sturmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M (2011) Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Am J Epidemiol 173:761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bauer AJ, Boeckxstaens GE (2004) Mechanisms of postoperative ileus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boeckxstaens GE, de Jonge WJ (2009) Neuroimmune mechanisms in postoperative ileus. Gut 58:1300–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawaguchi K, Izumi T, Aramaki KM (2012) A case of obstruction caused by accumulation of feces at the site of a functional end-to-end anastomosis after an operation for colon cancer. Rinsho Geka (Japanese) 67:1202

    Google Scholar 

  28. Negami N, Watabe M, Saitou S, Ishido T, Yamada YM (2010) A case of fecal ileus caused by fecal impaction in the intestine at the anal side of functional end-to-end anastomosis site. Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zassi (Japanese) 71:1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ibanez N, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Hernandez Q, Perrilla P (2017) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1349–1356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quigley EMM, Thompson JS (1994) Effects of artificial ileocolonic sphincter on motility in intestinal remnant following subtotal small intestinal resection in the dog. Dig Dis Sci 39:1222–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Foloranmi S, Rakoczy G, Bruce J, Humphrey G, Bowen J, Morabito A, Kapur P, Morecroft J, Craigie R, Cserni T (2011) Ileocaecal valve: how important is it? Pediatr Surg Int 27:613–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN (2015) Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 34:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan EK, Cornish J, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) Meta-analysis: alvimopan vs. placebo in the treatment of post-operative ileus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25:47–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nemeth ZH, Bogdanovski DA, Paglinco SR, Barratt-Stopper P, Rolandelli RH (2017) Cost and efficacy examination of alvimopan for the prevention of postoperative ileus. J Investig Med 65(949):952

    Google Scholar 

  35. Keller DS, Florez-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra S, Mahmood A, Haas EM (2016) Is there value in alvimopan in minimally invasive colorectal surgery? Am J Surg 212:851–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ehlers AP, Simianu VV, Bastawrous AL, Billingham RP, Davidson GH, Fichera A, Florence MG, Menon R, Thirlby RC, Flum DR, Farjah F, Colorectal Writing Group for the SCOAP-CERTAIN Collaborative (2016) Alvimopan use, outcomes, and costs: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program Comaparative Effectivness Research Translation Network Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 222:870–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trepanier M, Valin-Thorburn A, Kouyoumdjian A, Dumitra T, Alhashemi M, Kaneva P, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein BS, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Lee L (2019) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right colectomy does not affect gastrointestinal recovery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07204-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Allaix ME, Degiuli M, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Passera R, Morino M (2019) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 270:762–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sarah Sabboobeh, Marie Demian, and Georgia Rigas for their administrative support and assistance.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marylise Boutros.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Garfinkle, Al-Rashid, Morin, Ghitulescu, Faria, Vasilevksy, and Boutros have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garfinkle, R., Al-Rashid, F., Morin, N. et al. Are right-sided colectomies for neoplastic disease at increased risk of primary postoperative ileus compared to left-sided colectomies? A coarsened exact matched analysis. Surg Endosc 34, 5304–5311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07318-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07318-4

Keywords

Navigation