Log in

Head lice: an inexpensive bioassay for use as guidance for healthcare workers monitoring treatment failures for insecticide resistance (1994–1999)

  • Research
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Head lice, Pediculus humanus capitis De Geer (Psocodea: Pediculidae) that failed to respond to pyrethroid insecticide-based treatment products were first identified in London and Cambridge, UK, in 1993 after which reports of treatment failure arose throughout the UK. There was a need amongst healthcare workers for a rapid detection method for resistance that could be used at the community level. A laboratory service was set up so that health professionals could send lice by overnight post for bioassay testing for resistance. In addition, test kits were provided so that testing could either be conducted on site or lice could be shipped to the laboratory on pre-treated test papers so that insecticide exposure could proceed while lice were in transit to the laboratory. Between 1994 and 1999, over 350 samples from 145 locations were tested and during this time populations of lice resistant to pyrethroids, malathion, and carbaryl were identified from all parts of the country, both urban and rural. In some areas, lice were only resistant to one of the insecticides available but in other places lice showed tolerance to all three insecticides used at the time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used for log-probit calculations may be obtained from the author. Sources of samples are listed in Table S1.

References 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank all the anonymous school nurses, health visitors, and primary care practitioners who forwarded samples for analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All parts of this work, from concept, execution of the work, through to analysis and preparation of the manuscript were performed by the author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian F. Burgess.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Barnet Research Ethics Committee for a study in North London; South Bedfordshire Local Research Ethics Committee for a study in Bedford.

Consent to participate

Not applicable, except for participants in the studies in North London and Bedford where lice were collected as part of other study procedures.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Julia Walochnik

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

436_2022_7737_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file1 Logtime probit mortality regression lines comparing the effect of malathion 393μg cm-2 on clothing lice using filter papers treated with different malathion solutions.  Line1 (blue) propan-2-ol solvent, Line 2 (yellow) olive oil solvent prepared in ourlaboratory, Line 3 (red) olive oil solvent purchased from WHO (JPG 143 KB)

436_2022_7737_MOESM2_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file2 Prescribing trends in the UK of insecticide-based head louse treatments 2017-2021. A = 1% permethrin scalp application and B = 0.5% malathion aqueous liquid.  Note, some 0.5% malathion prescribing may have been for scabies treatment in addition to head lice and the dip in prescribing in 2019 was due to supply issues for the product.  Data downloaded from OpenPrescribing.net, The DataLab,University of Oxford, 2022 on 22nd March 2022. (JPG 524 KB)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 43 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burgess, I.F. Head lice: an inexpensive bioassay for use as guidance for healthcare workers monitoring treatment failures for insecticide resistance (1994–1999). Parasitol Res 122, 425–433 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07737-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07737-8

Keywords

Navigation