Log in

Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Research
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic surgical systems with full articulation of instruments, tremor filtering, and motion scaling can potentially overcome the procedural difficulties in endoscopic surgeries. However, whether robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) can overcome anatomical difficulties during thoracoscopic esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical and clinical factors that influence the difficulty of RAMIE in the thoracic region.

Methods

Forty-five patients who underwent curative-intent RAMIE with upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer were included. Using preoperative computed tomography images, we calculated previously reported anatomical indices to assess the upper mediastinal narrowness and vertebral body projections in the middle thoracic region. The factors influencing thoracic operative time were then investigated.

Results

During the thoracic procedure, the median operative time was 215 (124–367) min and the median blood loss was 20 (5–190) mL. Postoperatively, pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 17.8%, 2.2%, and 6.7% of the patients, respectively. The multiple linear regression model revealed that a narrow upper mediastinum and greater blood loss during the thoracic procedure were significant factors associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively). Upper mediastinal narrowing was not associated with postoperative complications.

Conclusions

A narrow upper mediastinum was significantly associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time in patients with RAMIE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y (2013) Current status of minimally invasive esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 61(9):513–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y (2013) Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46(4):241–248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marubashi S, Takahashi A, Kakeji Y, Hasegawa H, Ueno H, Eguchi S, Endo I, Goi T, Saiura A, Sasaki A, Takiguchi S, Takeuchi H, Tanaka C, Hashimoto M, Hiki N, Horiguchi A, Masaki T, Yoshida K, Gotoh M, Konno H, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Seto Y, Kitagawa Y (2021) Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan: report of the National Clinical Database 2011–2019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 5(5):639–658

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshida N, Baba Y, Shigaki H, Shiraishi S, Harada K, Watanabe M, Iwatsuki M, Kurashige J, Sakamoto Y, Miyamoto Y, Ishimoto T, Kosumi K, Tokunaga R, Yamashita Y, Baba H (2016) Effect of esophagus position on surgical difficulty and postoperative morbidities after thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28(1):172–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Okamoto K, Inaki N, Saito H, Shimada M, Yamaguchi T, Tsuji T, Moriyama, Kinoshita J, Makino I, Nakamra K, Takamura H, Ninomiya I (2023) Analysis of factors associated with operative difficulty in thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery in the left-decubitus position: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Surg 23(1):242

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mine S, Nishida K, Imamura Y, Kurogochi T, Kitagawa Y, Sano T (2016) Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 30(10):4279–4285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosoda K, Niihara M, Harada H, Yamashita K, Hiki N (2020) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: meticulous surgery minimizing postoperative complications. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4(6):608–617

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rice TW, Patil DT, Blackstone EH (2017) 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 6(2):119–130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, e Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haga Y, Beppu T, Doi K, Nozawa F, Mugita N, Ikei S, Ogawa M (1997) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunction following gastrointestinal surgery. Crit Care Med 25(12):1994–2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okamura A, Takeuchi H, Matsuda S, Ogura M, Miyasho T, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, Kawakubo H, Saikawa Y, Kitagawa Y (2015) Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22(9):3130–3135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Violette PD, Mikhail D, Pond GR, Pautler SE (2015) Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 9(2):117–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haveman I, van Weelden WJ, Roovers EA, Kraayenbrink AA, Dijkhuizen F (2022) Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in different classes of obesity: a cohort study. JSLS 26(1):e202100077. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00077

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage for the English language editing.

Funding

There are no funding resources to be reported or declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of this study. K.K., A.O., and J.K. collected and analyzed the data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by K.K. and A.O., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiko Okamura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no related conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

423_2024_3378_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Supplementary Material 1: Fig. 1 association between the UMI and the numbers of right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RRLN) or left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) retrieved rs indicates Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. (A) Number of RRLN lymph nodes retrieved and upper mediastinal index. (B) Number of LRLN lymph nodes retrieved and middle mediastinal index.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuriyama, K., Okamura, A., Kanamori, J. et al. Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 409, 190 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w

Keywords

Navigation